Archive for January, 2011


Michael Douglas cancer cure announcement is a cruel medical hoax

Wednesday, January 12, 2011
by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger
Editor of NaturalNews.com(See all articles…)

Learn more:http://www.naturalnews.com/030987_Michael_Douglas_throat_cancer.html#ixzz1B4KX1TnJ

 

NaturalNews-Logo_360x100(NaturalNews) Today the mainstream media is gleefully announcing that Michael Douglas has been “cured” of throat cancer. Yes, they use the “cure” word, as if to imply the cancer is gone and will never recur. Michael Douglas himself announced he has “beat cancer,” and various cancer survivor groups are celebrating Douglas as a “cancer survivor.”
Sadly, tragically, it’s all a cruel medical hoax. Michael Douglas is not a cancer survivor but rathera chemotherapy survivor. His doctors have poisoned his body’s vital organs — brain,liver, kidneys and heart — with extremely toxicchemicalsthat cause permanent, long-term damage. Yes, along the way acancertumor shrank in size, and yet even that observation is nocureeither. Why? Becausecancer tumors grow right back, usually within five years in the case of those with a history ofsmokingand drinking.

Mainstream media promoteschemotherapy

Yet, by parading Michael Douglas as an example of a cancer “cure,” themainstream mediais cruelly and unjustifiably functioning asthe marketing branch of the conventionalcancer industry, publicizing a blatantly false message that “chemotherapycurescancer.” This will have the effect of causing yet more cancerpatientsto sign up for toxic chemotherapy treatments which will, sadly, kill many of them.
In this way, the mainstream media has made Michael Douglas the poster boy for quackmedicineand fraudulent cancer “cures.” That’s not his fault, of course: He’s just trying to cure cancer the best way he knows how, and he no doubt believed the lies and deceptions his cancerdoctorswere trained to tell him. But the media is turning this into almost a celebration of the cancerindustry. And that is extremely irresponsible, given how many people don’t survive chemotherapy, even when far safer and morenaturaltherapies are readily available that really do cure cancer (but which have been outlawed in America).

The cancer industry is based on deception

If you really get down to the bottom of the issue here, the cancer industry is much like the financial industry (Wall Street) in thatit is based on lies and misinformation. In order to stay inbusiness, it must continue to promote those lies, which include messages like “There’s no such thing as a cure for cancer” unless you use their toxicpoisons, in which case they readily use the word “cure.” But you’re not really cured because 70% (or so) of people who get chemotherapy for throat cancer are dead within five years.
Whereas, in the natural realm, people who pursue radical changes inlifestyleand who undergo livefoodsjuicing therapies, Gersontherapyand other holistic approaches to cancer are literallycuredto the point where their bodies stop metabolizing cancer. They literally cure their own cancers out ofhealth, notpoison. And because of that, they survive a very large number of years thereafter.
Not every person is cured through the use of natural therapies, of course. Many people, for their own reasons, are unable to give up smoking cigarettes, or eating refined sugar, or consuming diet sodas or whatever substance probably contributed to their cancer in the first place. A genuine “cure” for cancer requiresabsolute commitment to a healthful lifestyle, including the complete avoidance of cancer-causing chemicals in personal care products (cosmetics, deodorants, perfumes, etc.), in foods (processed meat), in medicines and so on. It also requires a real nutritional overhaul of thebodythat boosts levels of vitamin D, selenium, zinc, vitamin C and plant-based anti-cancer nutrients such as those derived from raw cruciferous vegetables.
None of these things, however, were explained to Michael Douglas. The conventional cancer industry isn’t in the business of “educating” patients. It’s so much easier to justpoisonthem and bill their insurance companies for the poison. Then, for those who live through the suffering of the poison, they announce a (false) “cure” and congratulate them on being “cancer survivors.”

Why chemotherapytreatmentis a crime

It is cruel beyond measure to engaged in such celebration of the medical harming of a human being.Chemotherapy should be criminalized, not celebrated. It is a kind of “medical violence” being committed against human beings who are, 100% of the time, actually harmed by it. Remember that chemotherapy chemicals are derived from thechemical weaponsof World War I(Mustard Gas in particular). What was once used on the battlefield to murder soldiers is now dripped into the veins of cancer victims and called “medicine.”
The immediate side effects tell the real story of the dangers of chemotherapy to anyone paying attention: Extreme muscle loss, vomiting, hair falling out, a loss ofbrainfunction, sexual function and healthy sleep.These are not signs of peoplehealing.These are the signs of people who are being poisoned. This should be obvious to any intelligent observer.
That some people manage to survive these poisons is not a testament to the poisonous treatment itself but rather a demonstration of the amazing ability of the human liver to detoxify the human body, even against an onslaught of chemicalweaponsadministered by oncologists. And yet, even the liver has its limits, and after chemotherapy, most peoples’ livers are permanently damaged to some degree, setting them up for yet more medical procedures, pharmaceuticals and possibly even a liver transplant (ka-ching!).
Yes, it’s no exaggeration to say thatchemotherapy’s greatest benefit is to the doctors and hospitalswho depend on repeat business to stay profitable. Send a chemo patient home after a round of treatment, and you can be sure they will be back before too long, suffering from something else you can treat and bill.
Such is the sad,toxiclegacy of our so-called “scientific” system of modern medicine, where profits consistently override the best interests of the patients.

I wish Douglas the best possible outcome

Personally, I am saddened by the way in which the cancer industry exploits human suffering for its own profit. I am saddened to see such a fine individual as Michael Douglas have his health destroyed by chemotherapy. He deserves better. He deserves holistic medicine to remind his body thathe already knows how to cure his own cancerif he is just given the opportunity and education.
I genuinely hope Michael Douglas is cured of cancer through chemotherapy. Perhaps he will be one of the rare miracles who somehow escapes the toxic effects of being poisoned by doctors. Buthistorytells me that is a statistically unlikely and foolish hope, and that Douglas will be battling cancer yet again inside of five years.
I can only hope that he awakens to the world of natural healing and seeks a more natural route while that option remains available to him. In either case, even if he chooses conventional chemotherapy again, I wish him the best outcome and hope that his own biology can help him heal as quickly as possible. It saddens me beyond belief to see people being harmed by the conventional cancer industry. I am convinced that one day, chemotherapy will be outlawed. Until that day comes, it will continue to claim innocent victims who suffer and die at the hands of quack oncology.
Learn more:http://www.naturalnews.com/030987_Michael_Douglas_throat_cancer.html#ixzz1B4KLskWL

Caution: This Common Device Can Double Your Risk of Getting a Brain Tumor

mercola

mercola2

 

 

Commonwealth Club 11-18-10. Panel II – Martin Blank, PhD from ElectromagneticHealth.Org on Vimeo.

Dr. Martin Blank of Columbia University explains how the electromagnetic fields that emanate from your cell phone and other wireless devices affect your cells.

See All Mercola Videos

mercola3

Nikola Tesla once said:

"If you wish to understand the secrets of the Universe, think of energy, frequency, and vibration."

tesla

mercola1

Energy, frequencies, sounds, and vibrations are all around us, even if you can’t hear them, see them or sense them in any way, and they can have a profound impact on your health. I’ve written a lot about the dangers of electromagnetic fields (EMF) in general, and cell phone radiation specifically, but appreciation for the critical importance of this science for humans as well as the environment is proving slow, with tremendous resistance from industries with potential liability.

This will hopefully change in time, thanks to the likes of Martin Blank, PhD, who spoke at the November 18, 2010 Commonwealth Club of California program , "The Health Effects of Electromagnetic Fields", co-sponsred byElectromagneticHealth.org.

This event—the largest yet in the United States on EMF & health–was organized in association with the American Academy of Environmental Medicine, Citizens for Health, the EMF Safety Alliance, the Radiation Research Trust (U.K.) and theInternational EMF Alliance.

I highly recommend you set aside 20 minutes to listen to Dr. Blank’s speech in the video above. Dr. Blank speaks with deep experience and commanding authority on the impact on cells and DNA from electromagnetic fields, and explains why your DNA is especially vulnerable to electromagnetic fields compared to other tissues.

Health-concerned citizens should hear this information and then urge each of your representatives in Congress to view this video as well. It is only when elected officials understand the gravity of the science and the implications for health and the future of the species that steps will be taken to protect public health.

Who is Martin Blank, PhD?

Dr. Blank, past president of the Bioelectromagnetics Society, has an impressive resume backing up his statements on this topic. He has two PhD’s, one from Columbia University in Physical Chemistry, and another from Cambridge University in Colloid Science (biology, physics and chemistry).

He’s an Associate Professor at Columbia University in the department of physiology and cellular biophysics, and a researcher in bioelectromagnetics. He authored the section on stress proteins for the Bioinitiative Report, and edited the journal Pathophysiology’s special issue on the biological effects of electromagnetic fields.

In this talk, Dr. Blank explains the science of EMF—how electromagnetic frequencies impact your cells and DNA. On exposure to electromagnetic fields, he explains, cells respond as if they are in distress. We see this through the cellular stress response. This truly is crucial information, because I’m sure you’ve heard more than a few people reiterate the now tired, scientifically disproven, and incorrect statement that "non-thermal radiation cannot produce a biological effect."

Dr. Blank lays this and other inaccuracies to rest here with compelling and credible evidence. There are a lot of bona fide scientists speaking about this topic, Dr. Blank says, but many of them are speaking without having the prerequisite expertise within the field. This is important. Being a "scientist" is not enough here.

Physicists in particular are often introduced as ‘experts’ to defend the status quo of EMF’s being completely harmless (unless there is enough power to heat tissue), but as Dr. Blank warns, "the fact of the matter is they have not read the literature."

The Science is Clear: Non-Thermal Radiation DOES Cause Biological Harm

Dr. Blank is adamant when he says that there IS evidence of harm, and that the harm can be significant. He also points out that the science showing harmful effects has been peer-reviewed, published, and that the results have been replicated, evaluated and "judged by scientists capable of judging it." Most importantly, researchers now have a fair understanding of the actual mechanisms causing the damage, which I will summarize below.

The Spectrum of Frequencies that Surround You

When looking at a spectrum chart of frequencies, you’ll find that cell phones operate in the middle of the spectrum, in the microwave range, which is a subset of the radiofrequency band. Below microwaves are lower frequency radio frequencies, and at the bottom of the spectrum you have ‘extremely low’ frequencies known as ELF, which include frequencies from electrical wiring and household appliances, for example.

All of these frequencies are within the non-ionizing radiation range, which means they don’t have enough heating effect, or power, to separate electrons from atoms. Above that, you enter the ionizing frequency range, which include ultraviolet (UV) rays, gamma rays and x-rays.

Some of these frequencies exist in nature while others, such as telecommunications frequencies, are man-made and not something our bodies are adapted to, nor expected to ever adapt to. Just one of the many reasons why we need to thoroughly investigate the biological repercussions of broadcasting a range of these frequencies is that technologies keep transmitting more and denser content, such as audio, video, data, etc., which can create significant biological disruption due to modulation of the signals.

Also, higher and higher frequencies are being used, ostensibly because more information can be transmitted at these higher frequencies.

While various high frequencies are biologically disruptive, understand that the very low ELF frequencies can also be similarly harmful, such as electric and magnetic fields. One is not better or worse than the other, necessarily, but it is the cumulativeload of these exposures and the chronic duration of the exposures that we need to become cognizant of and protect ourselves against.

And as we’ll see below, DNA is reactive across the entire spectrum.

It’s quite clear and non-controversial that ionizing radiation causes significant damage to the human body, including cancer, but certain physicists are simply wrong when they claim you cannot get any kind of biological reaction as long as you stay within the non-ionizing range of frequencies.

These physicists are thinking about what they know well—heating effects on matter—but it’s clear they need to start spending time with the biologists! And they should certainly not be opining on this subject until they have read the science on the biological effects of EMF at non-thermal exposures.

It’s true that there’s an insufficient amount of energy to dislodge an electron, "but boy, you can get a lot of biological reactions in the non-ionizing range!" Dr. Blank says. "And they have been published and repeated so we know that you can get biological reactions in the non-ionizing range."

How EMF’s Cause Cellular Stress Responses and Biological Damage

DNA, as you probably know, is a molecule that contains genetic information. However, this genetic information does more than simply pass traits down to future generations. In fact, this genetic information is constantly being accessed to maintain optimal functioning within your body, in response to your environment.

As Dr. Blank explains, your DNA "is constantly at work, making proteins required for the business of life."

The ladder-like structures that make up the double helix of your DNA represent the chemicals that tie the two strands together. These structures contain the genetic code, and the sequence of the bases tells you what kind of molecule is required for building protein needed.

Some of these proteins are created in response to stress in what’s known as the cellular stress response. You may be familiar with the stress response in your body, in which cortisol and adrenaline is produced, for example. But each and every one of your cells has a similar defense mechanism against stress as well.

According to Dr. Blank, there are about 20 different stress proteins in nature, called heat shock proteins (HSP), which are used by your cells to counteract harmful stimulus. Whenever a cell is exposed to an unfriendly environment, the DNA separates in certain regions and begins to read the genetic code to produce these stress proteins (HSP).

Therefore, the presence of stress proteins is an indication that the cell has come into contact with something that is detrimental to its wellbeing. Essentially, it’s your cells’ way of saying, "I’ve encountered something bad." And, Dr. Blank emphatically claims, "There’s no question cells react to EMF’s as harmful." Research has clearly shown that radiation within the non-ionizing range can cause single- and/or double-DNA-strand breaks, which cells respond to by creating stress proteins.

Interestingly, researchers have discovered that your cells do not only react to frequencies in the microwave range, but across the ENTIRE SPECTRUM of frequencies, from low ELF’s and up!

Your DNA Acts as a Fractal Antenna

Dr. Blank compares your DNA to what electrical engineers refer to as a ‘fractal antenna.’ A fractal antenna is an antenna that can pick up a range of frequencies across the EMF spectrum. Two additional features of your DNA that fulfill the requirements of a fractal antenna are that electrons in DNA conduct electricity, and the fact that the DNA is coiled within the nucleus.

In the video above, Dr. Blank shows a slide listing the diameter sizes of the coils within the DNA molecule:

  • Double helix = 1 nm
  • Chromatin fiber = 10 nm
  • Solenoid = 30 nm
  • Hollow tube = 200 nm

Each of these different coil sizes respond to a frequency on the EMF spectrum, which explains why your DNA responds to such a wide range of frequencies.

In a nutshell, the human body is constructed with a fractal antenna inside each and every cell, which responds to the entire range of frequencies on the EMF spectrum!

What this means is that it would be foolish to focus on just one frequency, because we are bombarded with ALL of these frequencies, from low ELF’s to microwaves, to ionizing radiation. "And you never know which frequency will do the most damage," Dr. Blank warns.

DNA Responsible for EMF Response has Been Identified

In the video above, Dr. Blank explains that they have now identified the DNA that controls the response to electromagnetic fields.

They did this by taking the piece of the DNA molecule responsible for stimulating one specific stress protein (out of the 20 stress proteins produced). This particular stress protein is called HSP70.

The long line you see in the screenshot below from Dr. Blank’s presentation at the Commonwealth Club is a symbolic representation of the different parts of the DNA that are part of the promoter—this is the part of the DNA that gets activated to start the synthesis process.

In his presentation, Dr. Blank explains that the red rectangles are particular configurations of bases (CT-CT). They found that the section known as the EMF domain (shown here as the large red rectangle), controls the response to EMF’s. And, by changing that part of the DNA, they were able to effectively eliminate the EMF response.

EMF Specifity in HSP70 DNA

(Source: Slide from Martin Blank’s presentation at the Commonwealth Club of California, November 18, 2010.) In addition, a plausible EMF mechanism has also been identified and published in the Journal of Cell Physiology, back in 2008. (Other mechanisms of effect have been complied and recently published in the European Journal of Oncology in collaboration with ICEMS, and the Ramazzini Institute. The report, called "Non-Thermal Effects and Mechanisms of Interaction Between Electromagnetic Fields and Living Matter", can be downloaded at http://www.ElectromagenticHealth.org.)

In short, when you charge a molecule, you can cause that molecule to break apart. For example, researchers have shown that a hemoglobin molecule can be made to break apart by increasing the charge on the molecule.

The reason why the DNA molecule can be made to break apart even though the radiation is non-ionizing is because of the electrical conductivity inside the DNA molecule, i.e. the electrons present in the DNA bases can be made to move. And, EMF’s have been shown to cause electron transfer in the DNA.So, the idea that non-ionizing radiation cannot create a biological effect has been shown to be completely inaccurate.

Health Hazards Linked to Cell Phone Use

Scientists have found that microwaves transmitted by cell phones and other wireless devices can:

Cell Phones and Brain Cancer

There’s also a strong link between EMF exposure and cancer. A review of 11 long-term epidemiologic studies published in the journal Surgical Neurology two years ago revealed that using a cell phone for 10 or more years approximately doubles the risk of being diagnosed with a brain tumor on the same side of the head where the cell phone is typically held.

Professor Mild, lead researcher of that particular study, also cautioned that the danger may be even greater than what they found because cancers need a minimum of 10 years to develop. Since children today are using cell phones at an earlier age than any previous generation, their exposure will be far greater over their lifetimes. Because children have thinner skulls than adults, and their nervous systems are still developing, children are particularly vulnerable to this type of tumor and should not use cell phones at all.

Australia has seen an increase in pediatric brain cancers of 21 percent in just one decade. This is consistent with studies showing a 40 percent brain tumor increase across the board in Europe and the U.K. over the last 20 years.

Brain cancer has now surpassed leukemia as the number one cancer killer in children.The BioInitiative Report also includes studies showing evidence for exposure to electromagnetic fields brain tumors, acoustic neuromas, and childhood cancers like leukemia.

Steps You Can Take to Protect Yourself and Your Family

In the end, all the evidence points to the fact that our current safety standards are completely inadequate. Our rapidly expanding wireless technologies must be properly evaluated, first of all, and the precautionary principle must be invoked when new technologies emerge. While you can’t completely avoid radiation in today’s wireless world, if you’re ready to give up your cell phone, you can virtually eliminate that one hazard, at least.

If you’re not prepared to take that step, you can minimize your exposure by heeding the following advice:

Children Should Never Use Cell Phones: Barring a life-threatening emergency, children should not use a cell phone, or a wireless device of any type. Children are far more vulnerable to cell phone radiation than adults, because of their thinner skull bones.

Reduce Your Cell Phone Use: Turn your cell phone off more often. Reserve it for emergencies or important matters. As long as your cell phone is on, it emits radiation intermittently, even when you are not actually making a call.

Use a Land Line at Home and at Work: Although more and more people are switching to using cell phones as their exclusive phone contact, it is a dangerous trend and you can choose to opt out of the madness.

Reduce or Eliminate Your Use of Other Wireless Devices: You would be wise to cut down your use of these devices. Just as with cell phones, it is important to ask yourself whether or not you really need to use them every single time.

If you must use a portable home phone, use the older kind that operates at 900 MHz. They are no safer during calls, but at least many of them do not broadcast constantly even when no call is being made.

Note the only way to truly be sure if there is an exposure from your cordless phone is to measure with an electrosmog meter, and it must be one that goes up to the frequency of your portable phone (so old meters wont help much). As many portable phones are 5.8 Gigahertz, we recommend you look for RF meters that go up to 8 Gigahertz, the highest range now available in a meter suitable for consumers.

Alternatively you can be very careful with the base station placement as that causes the bulk of the problem since it transmits signals 24/7, even when you aren’t talking. So if you can keep the base station at least three rooms away from where you spend most of your time, and especially your bedroom, they may not be as damaging to your health.

Ideally it would be helpful to turn off your base station every night before you go to bed.

You can find RF meters at www.emfsafetystore.com. But you can pretty much be sure your portable phone is a problem if the technology is DECT, or digitally enhanced cordless technology.

Use Your Cell Phone Only Where Reception is Good: The weaker the reception, the more power your phone must use to transmit, and the more power it uses, the more radiation it emits, and the deeper the dangerous radio waves penetrate into your body. Ideally, you should only use your phone with full bars and good reception.

Also seek to avoid carrying your phone on your body as that merely maximizes any potential exposure. Ideally put it in your purse or carrying bag. Placing a cell phone in a shirt pocket over the heart is asking for trouble, as is placing it in a man’s pocket if he seeks to preserve his fertility.

Don’t Assume One Cell Phone is Safer Than Another. There’s no such thing as a "safe" cell phone.

Keep Your Cell Phone Away From Your Body When it is On: The most dangerous place to be, in terms of radiation exposure, is within about six inches of the emitting antenna. You do not want any part of your body within that area.

Respect Others Who are More Sensitive: Some people who have become sensitive can feel the effects of others’ cell phones in the same room, even when it is on but not being used.

If you are in a meeting, on public transportation, in a courtroom or other public places, such as a doctor’s office, keep your cell phone turned off out of consideration for the ‘second hand radiation’ effects. Children are also more vulnerable, so please avoid using your cell phone near children.

Use Safer Headset Technology: Wired headsets will certainly allow you to keep the cell phone farther away from your body. However, if a wired headset is not well-shielded — and most of them are not — the wire itself acts as an antenna attracting ambient information carrying radio waves and transmitting radiation directly to your brain.

Make sure that the wire used to transmit the signal to your ear is shielded.

The best kind of headset to use is a combination shielded wire and air-tube headset. These operate like a stethoscope, transmitting the information to your head as an actual sound wave; although there are wires that still must be shielded, there is no wire that goes all the way up to your head.

As Dr. Blank says, we all have to live with risk, but unless we’re willing to give up the conveniences these technologies provide, we must at least make accommodations to minimize the inherent risks.

You’re bathed in a wide range of frequencies every day, so please, at least take the above precautions to reduce your risk, and the risk to your children, who are even more vulnerable to long-term damage.

Dr. Blank ended his remarks emphasizing people must get involved in raising awareness. "And probably the most important part is the public education campaign. That is, people must be made aware of this issue. They must realize that even though they cannot see EMF or feel it, it’s having its effect and that these effects are cumulative, many are slow-acting, and that you really can’t beat it."

Let’s all do our part to educate others, and especially those in government responsible for setting exposure guidelines.

Gardasil Exposed – Deadly vaccine pushed on millions of young boys and girls worldwide

Gardasil

Gardasil Exposed – Deadly vaccine pushed on millions of young boys and girls worldwide

Thursday, January 13, 2011 by: Anthony Gucciardi, citizen journalist
See all articles by this author
Email this author
Learn more:http://www.naturalnews.com/030991_Gardasil_vaccine.html#ixzz1B4MdHbjC

 

 

NaturalNews-Logo_360x100(NaturalNews) Gardasil is a vaccination that has been linked to multiple deaths and over 8,000 adverse reactions. Recently, the FDA approved this deadly injection to be used against anal cancer. This means that in addition to pushing Gardasil on millions of young men and women to "prevent" the human papillomavirus (HPV), Gardasil is now marketed towards men and women up to age 26 as a "preventative" tool against anal cancer. As of January 2010, Gardasil has been linked to 49 deaths and countless side-effects, whilecancerassociated withHPVis only responsible for 1% of all cancerdeaths. Why then, is it being recommended to millions worldwide?
As of June 2009, 15 million girls have been injected with theGardasilvaccine. Out of 15 million people, 49 deaths may not seem like a lot. Unfortunately, however, there are many more cases of extreme side effects from thevaccination. In fact, the amount of adverse reactions was so high that Judicial Watch, a group that claims to exposegovernmentcorruption, was forced to step in. Between May 2009 and September2010alone, Gardasil was linked to 3,589 harmful reactions and 16 deaths. Of the 3,589 adverse reactions, many were debilitating. Permanent disability was the result of 213 cases; 25 resulted in the diagnosis of Guillain-Barre Syndrome; and there were 789 other "serious" reports according toFDAdocuments.
In August 2008, the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) required all female immigrants between the ages of 11 and 26 to receive at least one dose of the Gardasil vaccination if they planned on entering theUnited States. The enforcement was due to a law created in 1996 that required immigrants to receive any vaccination that was recommended by the United States government. The difference between the citizens of the U.S. and the immigrants seeking refuge within the country, is that the citizens can refuse any vaccination they do not wish to receive. While the requirement was lifted on December 14, 2009, countless immigrants were affected. This held especially true for the female immigrants who intended to havechildren. According to reports, 28womenexperienced miscarriages within 30 days of receiving the Gardasil injection. In response,the FDAsaid it is not worth investigating. Going against the FDA claims that Gardasil was completely safe, some government officials expressed concern over the fact that Gardasil was ever recommended for U.S. citizens.
"If we had known about it, we would have said it’s not a good idea," said Jon Abramson, the former chairman of the CDC’s Advisory Committee for Immunization Practices.
Dr. Diane Harper was theleadresearcher during the creation of both Gardasil and a similarvaccine, Cervarix. Leading theresearchteam gave Dr. Harper an inside look at the effects of Gardasil, which she has been exposing for over a year. Dr. Harper said that Gardasil would do very little to fight cervical cancer, and at the very least it should not be recommended to children younger than 15.
Unfortunately, the CDC did not agree, boasting about the anti-cancer effects of Gardasil and even going as far as to recommend it to girls as young as 9. Dr. Harper says that 70% of all HPV infections resolve themselves within a year, and within 2 years the percentage climbs to 90%. During an address at the 4th International Public Conference on Vaccination, Dr. Harper explained the risks associated with Gardasil. Instead of promoting the vaccine, which was expected of her, she told the truth. The audience was dazzled.
"I came away from the talk with the perception that theriskof adverse side effects is so much greater than the risk of cervical cancer, I couldn’t help but question why we need the vaccine at all," said Joan Robinson, Assistant Editor at the Population Research Institute.
Experts have spoken out, and the documents have been released. Gardasil is a deadly injection that claims to treat aninfectionthat has a 90% chance to resolve itself within two years. With Rick Perry’s failed attempt to force Gardasil on Texan schoolgirls, it is easy to see that the world has awoken to the truth regarding Gardasil. The research is clear: stay away from this poison serum.
Sources:
http://www.usatoday.com/yourlife/he…
http://washingtonexaminer.com/node/…
http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/33973…
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933…
http://thebulletin.us/articles/2009…

About the author

Anthony Gucciardi is ahealthactivist and wellness researcher, whose goal is centered around educating the general public as to how they may obtain optimum health. He has authored countless articles highlighting the benefits ofnatural health, as well as exposing the pharmaceutical industry. Anthony is the creator of Shatter Limits (http://www.ShatterLimits.com), a natural healthwebsite. Anthony has been accurately interpreting national and international events for years within his numerous political articles. Anthony’s articles have been seen by millions around the world, and hosted on multiple top news websites.
Learn more:http://www.naturalnews.com/030991_Gardasil_vaccine.html#ixzz1B4MVZPO9

 

revelation,pale horse,death,Hades

Twenty years and beyond not a single American could have comprehended that in the middle of the heartland where the Great Plains meet the Rocky Mountains, the Pale Horse of Death awaits your arrival. Even today, a large majority of Americans refuse to allow their thinking abilities to ascertain, and question, why a diabolical looking horse with vines and red glowing eyes greets all visitors at The Denver International Airport? Indeed, the argument can suggest that this evil looking horse represents a “bronco” identifying with the “Denver Broncos”; however, this type of “Bronco” misses the mark on the logo of the Denver NFL football teams memorabilia.

Combining the Artwork of the Murals, the Masonic Capstone that directly refers to the New World Airport Commission, and the Gargoyles sitting in Suitcases in the baggage terminals—the concept that this “Bronco” represents anything other than the Pale Horse of Death in the Book of Revelation sits as illogical with deep thinking individuals. Once inside many travelers and visitors have questioned the odd murals, artwork, and layout of the Denver Airport. Many travelers and researchers of Denver International will comment on the weird energy and the strange layout such as some of the concourses are only connected by train, no walking.

The cost of $4.8 billion, nearly $2 billion over budget, creating one of the most efficient airfields in the world that created the diagram of the Nazi Swastika. The 33,000 acres (52 sq mi; 130 km) of land occupied by the airport is nearly twice the land area of Manhattan.

OTHER FACTS OF DIA
  • 5300 miles of fiber optics were installed for communications (USA coast to coast is 3000 miles).
  • 110 million cubic yards of earth have been moved and the construction continues at the Denver Airport. Many enthusiastic onlookers claim a massive underground complex beneath the Airport.
  • Different contractors have been hired for different parts of the airport. They’ve all been fired after their job was done. Many skeptics and observers claim this strategy is to hide the true intent of the project.
  • Fueling system that can pump 1000 gallons of jet fuel per minute. This amount is totally absurd for a commercial airport.
  • Granite imported from all over the world, obviously the 2 billion dollar over budget is a non issue.

There is a large number of people that agree: The Denver International Airport is built for the New World Order. It is said that DIA will serve as the headquarters for the New World Order in the West, an underground city for the elites, a military base, and a huge surface/underground concentration camp, or “Death Intermediate holding Area”. The reality is that DIA could also serve as an extermination/death killing center for the New World Order. Many people who study the alien issue claim there is a huge alien lab deep under DIA.

Sounds far fetched? Yes, only for those who refuse to study the context and wake up to the evil intentions New World Order and the current issues of 2012.

Leo Tanguma painted the Murals, supposedly paid $100,000 for the first ones and that they represent peace, harmony and nature. Certainty, upon the ideology of the Nazis on how to accomplish “peace and harmony”. Some current sources say that some of these murals have been painted over or taken down. However, the issue is to analyze the original murals and to decipher the message of deception.
alt
The above Mural is representing destruction, it shows a city in the background with a haze, the forest is burning, and the glass cages may represent a biochemical war. The three girls near the bottom that are in coffins represent the dying of religion and other concepts. The girl you see with the black hair and blue shirt is holding a tablet, supposedly the Mayan Calendar. The key to this Mural is the dark colored individual with the “halo”, keep this in mind. The Caucasian girl on the lower right in the coffin is holding a bible and the Jewish yellow star is visible.fasle peace,world peace, world to unite
The next mural no doubt expresses world peace, however notice that the nations are giving their weapons to the German boy in the blonde hair and gray jacket who is ” beating their swords into plowshares”. The few key points to notice are the two doves that represent peace, the rainbow that continues to the next mural, and the solider with the gas mask that appears to be dead.

What a wonderful story to accomplish peace you must have war, at least that is what Hitler taught. However the story doesn’t end.

denver airport, military nazi
An interesting concept, after the peace mural of the entire world handing their weapons to the german boy. In the above mural, the Military figure with the gas mask comes to life. Not only that this military image represents the Fascist Nazis, the rainbow swoops around the military guy, fades outs, and points to a distraught boy with a blanket wrapped around himself. The dove lost its mate and is being poked in the butt with the sword, and everyone looks like they have went to hell and awoke up in Satan’s playground of horror. This picture was cut off, but on the bottom righthand corner Leo Tanguma painted an letter from the holocaust. It is an actual letter written by a Hama Herchenberg, 14 years old, that died December 18, 1943 in Auschwitz Concentration camp.

Take note: the two above murals could be translated the opposite direction. The Military conquers the earth first to attain peace.
holocaust letter,denver airport
Fascinating, right in the middle of the American Heartland, a country where they use to call “the home of the brave” exists the story how the diabolical elite of the world plan to accomplish their one world peace. After the above murals is the scene of their idolatrous worship of peace.
idolatrous peace,fake peace,denver
Looks like a happy family of mind control if you ask me; notice the guy with the Halo? although a more defined halo and the middle of the attention and the worship of the strange type of “tree or plant”.

There are many different theories and definitions of the murals at the Denver Airport. Many people believe that the New World Order will genocide 90% of humanity off of the earth. That is what Jesse Ventura is teaching within his third episode of his “conspiracy theories show” on TruTV. On his last show about 2012, Jesse Ventura portrayed that the Denver Airport is an underground bunker for the Government for 2012. Partly true except that he avoided to mention the runways are shaped as a Nazi Swastika. And, gave no explanation for the murals, except that they just questioned, “what is that?”.

Possibilities of Deception!

Consider the invested interest that the Lower Entities have in the human race, I highly doubt there will be a genocide of humanity. This propaganda is a deception to create fear and hopelessness and so people will accept the NWO. The lower entities need energy and the human race is a prime source. There is a much deeper diabolical plan of the combined powers of the darkness with the humans they trap into their domination.

FEW DIFFERENT DECEPTIVE SCENARIOS:
  • A chemical warfare is a possibility, but how would the world unite? Unless they create a scenario of accidents, but a lot of people would catch on—not very deceptive.
  • An earthly catastrophe could unite humanity, and possible the antichrist stepping in as the savior. However, a major amount of people are expecting this scenario to occur.
  • The New World Order taking control by force? Not very likely, there is not much deception behind that idea. I think the powers of the darkness are a little to smart to make their plan that obvious.
  • The prime type of deception would be a war, but with the alien Grays attacking humanity or some other type of ET. Since over 85% of humanity refuses to believe in ET aliens, this scenario would shock the mind and create a panic which handicaps the ability to problem solve. The entire world would unite, especially if the holy sites, and locations of national identity were bombed. And, a war would cause trauma upon many people that can add to the agreement level of the mind. However, this war would be fabricated from the one with the halo in the murals who could very well represent the antichrist. The thought process would shift suddenly that would infuse the brainwashing propaganda that humanity is being taught such as the 2012 syndrome.

To correlate with the murals, after this fabricated war—or however you want to view the destruction—which the antichrist would cause a miracle to save humanity from the aliens; the united world will happily surrender their national and religious positions and accept the New World Order with the surrendering of their weapons of mass destruction. After this deception, the New World Order with the Antichrist as the leader will round-up and kill anybody who resists or opposes. Anyone who agree and submits to the New World Order will be their human chipped slave. This will be the great tribulation that Jesus taught. Once the New World Order has murdered all the opposers, and anybody who possesses a disposition to truth, love, and light; at the time New World Order is declaring “Peace and security” Then, Jesus will return to reduce the kingdom of the Darkness (the new world order) into their dark hole of existence. This will accomplish the separation of the Weeds from the Wheat—the light of truth on the right, and the darkness of falsehood and wickedness on the left.

I am sure this sounds like a good blockbuster movie for many? But, think of the possibility under the thought of deception?

It has been said that the Illuminati Elite are obligated to warn humanity because they live by a “Masonic Code”. It is a possibility, although it should be clear that the powers of the darkness don’t want people who are aware, because people that comprehend the truth have open minds. The NWO want people who are deluded and duped through their mind control techniques of television and false propaganda. By revealing the truth and the corruption in Government, the powers of the darkness will easily root out the nucleus of the opposition at the very beginning to avoid a strong influence upon the large deluded mass of humanity, this is also possibility.

An Opinion from the 2012 Forum about DIA:

Actually what they did was hire a bunch of workers from one company to build one part, then fire that contractor and hire another to build another section, then fire them and hire another, so on and so forth. There have been workers who have come forward because of the things they saw, such as an 8 story underground building that was built, then suddenly they said ..oh whoops we didn’t mean to build that over there, and they started over in a different spot, but the building they “abandoned” was pretty much completed already. Not to mention there are tons of tunnels underneath, and a whole host of other mysterious things…like the fact that they can generate WAY more power than they can actually use.

The runway and buildings were built and then buried (the runway with a little over 6 inches of topsoil) and the cause for this was it was “not to proper specs” when in fact the normal policy is to “tear down and remove” cement, framings, and other materials not needed if they were built wrong in the first place.

Denver was chosen because it is centrally located and connects to hundreds of miles of underground tunnels, which likely lead to a giant underground city for the Elites and Government officials.

Oh and btw…I live in Colorado, if you couldn’t discern from my user name. I’ve been to DIA at least 100 times, and seen every one of the “conspiracy objects”…the murals, the headstone with the symbol of the free masons, the gargoyle in the suitcase, the giant power plant, the miles of tunnels where you see giant air ducts coming out of the ground, etc etc. I’ve seen underground tunnels on the train system that go off into the darkness at junctions…sure they could be all repair bays for the trains, or something like that…but it’s odd that some of those tunnels are lit, some are pitch black and you almost don’t even see them as you move along quickly in the dimly lit train tunnels. So I do think a lot of what’s been suggested about the DIA conspiracies have a good chance of being true.

In addition, an excellent source is Author Alex Christopher who claimed to have worked in the tunnels under the airport, and described what appeared to be vast holding areas for prisoners, strange nausea-inducing electromagnetic forces, and caverns big enough to drive trucks through.
The information of Alex Christopher is worth reading.

Related Post with the picture of the Denver Airport Runway.

Related Posts:

The Forbidden Letters – Part 1

“Here you can read the so called the Forbidden Letters, five in total (posts 1-5). The first being quite cryptic, the rest less and less cryptic. Please excuse mistakes in our English, we are French.
Our letters are a reaction on The Serpent Grail, a book by Philip Gardiner and Gary Osborn, launched September 15th 2005. Their website can be reached at  http://www.gardinersworld.com/

The Paris 4

Note: Responses to the Forbidden Letters are presented in chronological order
(the most recent are at the bottom of the list (see the menu on the left)


Letters 1 – 5

Note:  N.N. nomen nominandum” (= name hither to unknown).

The FIRST Forbidden Letter

“N. Nominandum” <laborsolis@…> wrote:

Dear Mr. Gardiner,

Allow us to email you. We’ve been expecting your book for over 19 years know, although we must admit we only knew that it was to be launched during the reign of Pope Benedict. (There is no such thing as a free will/ (Du wirst gethan) Nietzsche.)

Let us just help you a little bit more. With a latin text. Composed in the year 1170 AD.

urbs transrhenana anno DCCXI. pupulus nudus silentio noctis conflagrat. hic incipit labor solis. gloriam olivae expectamus.

And remind you of the two last Latin verses in the list of Maleachi (the Popes). de labore solisfollowed by gloria olivae. Followed, naturally, because a shining Tree of Life (spine and brain), the olive tree, is the product of ‘the work of the sun’, as you will know. Trees well hidden for the moment of course.

It is very important that you realize that the Popes are not involved in this. They are only the vehicles in this ‘story’.

Now, you will also want to stick to these 16 words in this and no other order: beheading, stone, stone (producing) kundalini, racing to the centre of the earth, and coming back again. The stone, although it’s hard to believe, being a real stone, though not a stone like we know it. (Alchemists are not those who write about alchemy, but only those, who produce the stone in their body, which ignites the Kundalini fire).

Now, you will say to yourself: many people claim to have had this kundalini-fire. But you see, they didn’t. They were after power, money, followers, whatever. People who produce the stone, and through that stone the fire of resurrection, will never go public.

And this is very important too: if you produce that stone and were consumed and reproduced through that fire, you will achieve individual and physical immortality, and nothing less. Something for the End of Time therefore. Who ever died was not an alchemist and did not produce the stone.

By the way, your man is a gay man. Born on the 17th of January. In possession of that very special balance in microcosmic male and female forces. A balance never possessed by heterosexual men. And your stone is Christ (He who is near me is near the fire, and he who is near the fire is near the Kingdom). Also: 1 Peter 2:4.

You are going to be just in time now to produce your next and last book on the grail.

Goodbye.

P.S. That gay man, born on the 17th of January, is not the one who wrote this email. He is the one though who allowed us to write it. This email was sent to you from a country in Europe, not being the country your man of the 17th of January is living.


The SECOND Forbidden Letter

“N. Nominandum” <laborsolis@…> wrote:

Dear Mr. Gardiner and dear Mr. Osborn,

Thank you for you second reply. We are, by the way, four. You can call us the Paris 4 (not playing with you). We have one thing in common: we know the one person who produced in a certain night not to long ago the stone. The grail. The Christ within (I will become like you, more and more, you will become like I more and more (‘Jesus’)). The production of that stone is not the goal of alchemy, like alchemists say, it’s the starting point. It ignites the fire of alchemy. This fire will, after it is tuned down, produce in many year the Kingdom within. (It grows quitte in the way Jesus tells ut it grows; like a plant, in the body, with the full grown chakra’s as the flowers in the end)

Then , the Latin was not ours. Furthermore, you say that you are going to write not on the subject of the Grail anymore, but instead, on the subject of esoterics and Gnosis. But that exactly is the field of the Grail. For you see, there is only one nature (physos) and only one metaphysos. Now, you will want to follow us just a little bit more. The endgoal of evolution is alchemy. If you are not writing about alchemy, you are writing either about nothing, or about something unimportant. Alchemy is about deification. It is about ‘God’ becoming man, and man becoming God. (I have said ye are gods, repeats ‘Jezus’ the psalmist)

You will remember that ‘Jesus’ also said: if you produce what is within you, it will save you. But, if you do not produce what is within you, it will destroy you (this unproduced thing is shakti latent).

And a last remark for now: we don’t want to be arrogant (you are both two fine men, with fine instinct and born for this goal) but you are going to write about the Grail once more. Because it’s in the stars. This is not a threat of course (we can not, nor want to, force you to write a book). But we have read about you, like we said, already 19 years ago. And you can’t escape destiny. Remember, there is no such thing as a free will. It is possible of course that our ‘book’ is wrong, but we don’t really think so.

Again, we are not the person who produced the stone. He is the one though who allows us to write you. And we are under under censorship. Naturally. And furthermore you understand that our mother tongue is French. Please excuse mistakes in our English.

Yours,

The Paris 4.


The THIRD Forbidden Letter

“N. Nominandum” <laborsolis@…> wrote:

Dear Mr. Gardiner, dear Mr. Osborn,

After talking to our ‘gay man born on the 17th of January who produced the stone little over 19 years ago now’ we decided to mail you a second time this morning (after all, you invited us to post more of our knowledge).

We wrote in earlier mail ‘By the way, your man is a gay man’ without properly introducing him. We corrected that in the introduction of this mail we believe. Our apologies.

Then, our man is gay, but this is not about a gay agenda or movement. There is nothing wrong with homosexuality, nor with heterosexuality (you may know that the Paris 4 are all heterosexual, and three of us are married). And homosexuality doesn’t automatically provide the perfect balance of the microcosmic male and female (so gay’s aren’t better people, because our man is gay), but heterosexuality can’t (provide that balance). That much is true. That balance is needed for the hieros gamos, the alchemical wedding. Without that balance, which, again, only a few homosexuals posess, a safe conduct of the kundalini fire is impossible.

Then, the words ‘stone (producing) kundalini’ (the 16 words in our first letter) imply the exit of the serpent through the spine. It is driven out by that fire. The lore of India is correct here. We forgot to mention that exit.

Then, we do not ‘believe that we have the answer to all’, we have the answers to this all.

Then, a general remark of extreme importance: the gospel never took place. We do not know whether a man called Jesus ever lived, it’s not important, but the gospel never took place.

Then, you say ‘the stone at the centre of the universe, like the Kaaba or the rock on the Mount.’ The Kaaba and the Rock are not at the center of the universe. The centre of the universe is in the microcosmos of the human body. The macrocosmos is in the microcosmos, not the other way around (the world is my projection/ the real sun and moon are in you, not out there). The stone (we are allowed to reveal, is a true stone (as we have said earlier), although not like an ordinary stone. It is even pointy and about the size of a child’s fist.

Now you will also understand that there is no such thing as a God outside. And there are no such things as good and bad either. (Good I call what I think is in my advantage, bad, what is believd by me to be in my disadvantage (Spinoza)) Religion is bunk. Your God and heaven spell alchemy.

Then, Gnosis and esoterica are the knowledge of the divine spark within. Gnosis and estorica are also heavily polluted by religion and moral.

The Grail is the firestone. The stone that delivers that spark and that starts the kundalini/resurrection-fire. It is most directly revealed in 1Peter 2:4 (often translated with as al living stone, but the Greek reads lithon zoonta (the living stone) and not hoos lithon zoonta (as a living stone). And revealed of course even more in the only German Grailbook (by von Eschenbach): ‘by the power of that stone the Phoenix (Kundalini) burns to ashes and the ashes restore him to life again.’

We would appreciate a short reaction on this stuff, before we start to tell you about John the Baptist, Secret Mark and the source of The New Testament.

Again, we mailed you this morning on this email address how we can find your forum on which you publish our mail. We searched on http://www.gardinerosborn.com/forum, clicked ouserselves silly on the site itself, but weren’t able to find it.

Hoping to hear from you soon,

Yours sincerely,

The Paris 4.

P.S. Our mails are composed in Paris. Then sent to our gay friend and then sent to another country in Europe, recomposed on this email address, and then sent to you from a public computer. We kindly ask you not to publish this email address. We’d be inundated by mail. You understand.


The FOURTH Forbidden Letter

“N. Nominandum” <laborsolis@…> wrote:

Dear Mr. Gardiner, dear Mr. Osborn,

We didn’t receive a reply on our last two mails. Bur we are instructed nevertheless to go on sending you our information. Here we go.

The Christian scriptures are a vehicle for alchemy. The source-author is a Greek writer from Egypt who composed two manuscripts with sayings in around 120 BC. These manuscripts are not in our possession. We didn’t read them either. We don’t know even whether they still exist. Most of the manuscripts is found back in the parables of the fictional character Jesus about the Kingdom of God/Heaven our gay man ensures us. The most ‘alchemical’ Christian scripture is the gospel according to Thomas (the olive tree as the tree of life though is only found in Philip). The churches weren’t able to destroy this copy found in the 20th century. It was secured. Destroy, because genuine alchemy (‘ Woe the soul that depends on the flesh, woe the flesh that depends on the soul’ Jesus in Thomas) leaves no room for after-life- theology. That fundament of “churchianity” and false hope.

We informed you that alchemy is about personal physical immortality, and nothing less (like a prolonged life or good health). (Hence: woe the soul and woe the flesh.) To achieve this immortality a dragon has to be killed. A serpent. (drakon is Greek for serpent.) The ‘blood’ from that dragon is the future inner body elixir which will grow the inner light-body as it is so beautifully called. This lightbody is ‘nothing’ but a fortification of the subtle-body, with which every human being is already born. Once it is strong enough (Jesus repeats this several times) it will take over the flesh-body. (That’s the harvest.) And it is called the lightbody, because from that moment on ones body emits light too (the bridal clothes). Remember that Jesus ensures us that ‘your whole inner body will be filled with light’.

On we go to Secret Mark. We simply recommend it in combination with (public) Mark chapter 14, verse 51. Note the word naked (gymnos). Why is it used? And why is it Mark takes the effort to write in verse 54 about Peter who just left the scene ‘and warmed himself at the fire’? (It was apparently cold that night, but our fictional young man was nevertheless motivated to wear but a linnen cloth cast about his naked body.) And we recommend John 13:23, 19:26 and 27. Why is John speaking about a disciple whom Jesus loved? Didn’t he love the others? Naturally, but a certain disciple in a special way. It is not impossible that other homo-erotic parts were removed by the church in the dark ages. But these weren’t probably recognized as homo-erotic. They are too subtle. We repeat here that homosexuality is a conditio sine qua non for alchemy.

On we go to John the Baptist. How did he die? You will say: by beheading. But he didn’t. How do we know? Because a) the one and only person who talks about being baptized in fire (kundalini) is the one and only who is beheaded (alchemy) and b) the one and only historian who wrote about John the Baptist (and has no reason to lie of course), Josephus, writes in his Antiquities, XVIII, caput 5: what he (Herod) did against John, who was called the Baptist: for Herod slew him.

A word here and now too on Simon bar Jona who saw his name changed into Peter. Peter comes from the Greek petra, meaning rock. A rock is not a stone (alchemy), but the next best thing to a stone if you want to encode alchemy. A stone is lithos in Greek, but you can’t make a name with lithos. He holds the key’s to heaven (the kundalini stone). Christ’s real church consists of the people baptized in fire through that stone. So this congregation is in a way built upon that (kundalini) stone. Peter is also called Caephas. And that means three things in aramaic: head (referring to the alchemical beheading), stone and rock.

For you will remember too that in certain grail-lore heads are taken of and replaced by other heads. Now, we are not talking about the head of flesh to be taken of. That would be lethal ofcourse. It is the microcosmic, subtle head, interwoven in the head of flesh that is taken of and replaced after the fire by a new subtle head (the Christ).

We are closing for today. If you search in alchemy, at one point you will find the expression V.I.T.R.I.O.L. (= visit the centre of the earth and by rectification you will find the stone). The alchemist- writers are quite mistaking here. We recommend our 16 words from our first mail: first the stone is produced, then the journey to the inner earth starts. The stone is found in the body, not in the earth. Mind you, everything is, in the end, found in the body. If an alchemist travels through the earth, he’s doing that in the microcosmos of the body. Remember what we said: the real sun and moon (and earth) are in you. Not outside. And this explains why our friend could still hear common street noise outside his apartment when he traveled to the centre of the earth over 19 years ago with tremendous speed.

It will be more than clear to you now that nothing ‘Christian’ has happened in the year 33. Let alone something crucial. The acts of Jesus are as fictional as the acts of Parzival.

We will send you one more email. An email that will conclude our contribution to your knowledge of ‘the Kundalini-stone and the End of Time’. After that you will not hear from us anymore.

We greet you,

Yours truly,

The Paris 4.

P.S.

We still were not able to reach your Forum. Very tiresome. We get page expired from 3 countries if we click on the Forum-button. We kindly ask you again how we can reach the mail you published.


The FIFTH Forbidden Letter

“N. Nominandum” <laborsolis@…> wrote:

The Kundalini-stone, Quantum Physics and the End of Time

Dear Mr. Gardiner, dear Mr. Osborn,

As promised here our last mail, being our fifth and last letter.

It is repeatedly said by Jesus that ‘if you have faith like a mustard seed’ and ‘if you make the two one’ or if ‘two make peace in the same house’ (the unification of the two opposites through alchemy), in the end you will be omnipotent (‘nothing will be impossible to you’). You could ‘move a mountain’. This moving of the mountain is often related to faith (being one in the sense that you do not doubt anymore), but this is mere pollution of the gospel. Becoming omnipotent has nothing to do with faith. It has got everything to do with ‘the work of the sun’, a.k.a the magnum opus.

You said in a mail that we are all connected. And we are. But even in a more dramatic way most people know. We know now through quantum physics (the realm of the microcosmic sub-atomic world, the fundament of the so called real, atomic world), that distance may well exist in the atomic Einstein world, but that it doesn’t exist in the sub- atomic quanta-world.

In the Einstein-world there is one chief dirty word: simultaneous. The laws of that world dictate that every action takes time. No simultaneous reaction is therefore possible. But in the sub-atomic world, not energy is passed on to cause a reaction, but information.

But what has this got to do with the promised omnipotence to the ‘sons of man’ you will ask? How can anyone move a mountain, unless he posesses at least the energetic equivalent of the mountain itself? He can’t of course. Unless he’s deified. Because in that case you don’t need energy to do your thing, all you need is to pass information through your will. You ‘reprogram’ the mountain, that is, the mountain in your projection (the world is my projection). For the real mountain is in the sub-atomic world, not in the atomic.

And if you are deified (the harvest) you will be able to mess with your projector.

By the way, don’t take our word for it. Take the word of Mr.. Wang and Mr.. Bedford instead.

Phenomena in sub-atomic physics such as Bell’s Theorem (everything that was once connected will stay connected for ever) and the Einstein Podolsky Rosen non-locality differences have led to significant rethinking of the relationship between consciousness and reality (the world is my projection (our remark)). Such thinking forms the basis for modern conceptions of magic and paranormal (psi) phenomena, in that the human mind may have a significant, but non- physical effect on material reality. Or, as Wang and Bedford put it (1985): “one of the non-mechanical aspects of causation may be will and intention.”
[Solorion at http://theparty.netraver.org.za/Magic.html ]

But back to ‘making peace in one house’. What is meant here?

Jesus says: do not go the broad and easy way to death. Go instead the dark, narrow and dangerous way. (Mind you, this is not very precisely put. People are invited to the Grail. You cannot invite yourself. If you are invited you will go that road, if not, you never will.)

But again, what does he mean?

You know that there is a beast inside all of us. That beast has to be let out in a certain crisis in alchemy. It is raw psychic energy (libido). And exactly that dark energy is used to build up the lightbody. It is extremely dangerous and leaves you with a pandemonium of aggression-impulses for several months( and other complaints), and in weaker form for several years (the energy is consumed more and more and the impulses gradually disappear). To safely conduct this energy you need an extraordinary strong mind (he who will overcome). This process is sometimes called the night of the soul. It is absolute horror the first two weeks. Horror still the next three months and quite a burden for about three years, till the whole beast is consumed and transformed into lightbody and chakra’s (well hidden then still). Now you will, by the way, also understand what is meant by the words: happy he who has (that still hidden lightbody), for he shall receive (omnipotence and immortality through the lightbody). He who has not that lightbody will lose even what he thinks is his. exempla sunt odiosa.

Now you will also understand the parable in which Jesus talks of a garden in which a tree is planted (the spine and brain in kundalini- fire as the tree of life). But no fruits are produced for years (the night of the soul is part two of alchemy, and doesn’t occur untill after many years (after the kundalini/resurrection)). The owner wants to cut down the tree, but his servant says: let me just shake the tree, and give water and fertilizer. Perhaps then the fruit will come. That is ‘the night of the soul’. He say’s, if the fruit is still not coming then, you can always cut down the tree. This, of course, will not happen. It’s a parable, not an analogy. Whatever the grail starts, the grail will finish. The night of the soul is by te way wonderfully described in the Parzival of van Eschenbach in the story about the Chastel Marveille (Wondercastle) where Parzival has to fight a lion.

‘Happy the lion who is eaten by a man, because that lion will become a man. But woe the man that is eaten by the lion, for he will become a lion.‘ (Jesus in Thomas) (It’s the theme of the Sphinx).

Goodbye to you Mr. Gardiner, and goodbye to you Mr. Osborn.

All the best to you and your loved ones.

From a bumpy Paris on November 9 2005,

The Paris 4.

P.S.

Did we destroy your past and future books on Gnosis, the Grail and esoterics, or did we not? Do they look like child’s stories, or not? They do, n’est ce pas? But don’t despair. After all, we have great confidence in you and you have in posession the real truth behind the Holy Grail, the Philosopher’s Stone and the Elixir of Life now. And which other author can say that? For, if we wouldn’t have mailed you, you’d still be in the dark. And stayed without a doubt in that dark all your life. So don’t be depressed: a crisis that is not for the better, is the most rare thing on earth (Persian saying).

Do not miss Part 2: PS to The Forbidden Letters


PS by Philip Gardiner

“The Paris 4 contacted me and asked me to listen to their viewpoints on the Grail legend. I get this quite a lot as you may understand. I recently spent time in a foreign land on the trail of information given to me by a very real secret society and this will become part of a new book.

I listened to the information the Paris 4 were sending, and I thoroughly enjoyed their interpretation, whilst having reservations on why they wished to remain secret. I can still only assume it may have something to do with the gay aspect spoken of in their work or maybe they just want to remain private – either way I respect their judgement as I would for anybody else.

The information came thick and fast and I was quite enjoying, if not totally agreeing, with what I was reading. Then something strange happened. Almost everybody on my own forum started being hacked. My emails and the Paris 4’s emails were intercepted and we seemingly started saying bad things against each other. I closed up and refused to listen to anymore. Then we both found that somebody had been messing with our emails. Some people on my forum also had the same thing and eventually we all managed to get filters and god knows what else to stop it.

Next I contacted, or they contact me – can’t remember and don’t care – the Paris 4. We sorted it out and we actually found that we quite liked each other and so carried on. The next set of their “letters” have now been posted on your site and of course are there for people to read and take from them what they will.

I am, though, sending this because I believe a little balance needs bringing in and because I am getting a few emails asking me what my own opinion is on the information the Paris 4 are supplying. Well, my own opinion is that I cannot agree with all I read and much of it is already in the public domain anyhow. Other extensive parts I agree with completely. That said, their research is complex and their insight into the “internal” world of the mind, that of somebody who has obviously experienced such things. I do have issues with the kundalini that I will be releasing in the future once a paper that myself and a leading psychologist have prepared is peer reviewed, but until that point I would only say to people that the kundalini can be a truly enlightening thing or a terrible thing – just like Catholicism or cults or communism or anything else we tie our hopes, dreams and lives to. This opinion is, I know, very controversial, but then I have never been afraid of controversy.

What seems to be happening is a spread of these Letters and the so-called secrets they hold, which if proven correct isn’t a bad thing and if incorrect then at least they are out in the open for people to make up their own minds. I am firmly of the opinion (because I believe in very little) that the information from the Paris 4 is a great starting point for discussion as we have seen across the net. I think it has inspired people to “think” and thats good. I think my contact in the Paris 4 is a gentleman and a scholar and that he has only true and good intentions and I can fully relate to that.

For me, I am evading the kundalini and inner “fire” from now on because I have researched it to death and our new “paper” is my final word (unless something else crops up). My future is looking very strange for me actually as I am currently hacking out 3 tv documentaries and a reality tv show that I have been asked to put together. I am about to go off and film for a new Channel 4 doc too on secret societies and then its back to New York for more chat shows before the Da Vinci Code comes out. Added to that I have just finished 2 new books which should be out next year. So, as you can probably tell, the Forbidden Letters, the Paris 4 and myself are at an end of our discussions and correspondence, as I simply do not have time to follow it up and I think they were nearly at an end anyhow. I would suggest that this is somebody else’s role now not mine.

My best to all the good people who read this wonderful website, my warmest wishes and thanks to the Paris 4 and especially my contact (who I can’t name), especially as they have given me such an amazing amount of undeserving publicity!

May truth, honour, justice, compassion and above all love be your guides.

Philip Gardiner, 2006.”

I also have a new site,  http://www.gardinersworld.com/, set up to answer some of the issues being raised by the Paris 4 and other things…

* * *

Note: The Paris 4 have requested the following to be added in to the PS:

We have one little request though. It is not clearly stated in your PS that is was us who proposed to stop the contact because we felt everything has been said. This is so important, because from the PS as published now people think we might have more information, and we don’t.

 

The Forbidden Letters – Part 2

Here is some extra information on The Forbidden Letters taken from emails sent to Philip Gardiner
by the Paris 4 between November 10, 2005 and January 29, 2006.

The Paris 4.


1.

In letter number two we wrote ‘this fire will, after it is tuned down, produce in many years the Kingdom within. It grows like a plant…’ etc.

We were summarizing there a little bit to boldly. For, it is not the fire which does that. The fire lasts for about 20 minutes and then stops. Our gay man tells us that after that fire about 36 hours later the top chakra opens.

India says this is the last chakra to open, but it’s just the other way around. The top chakra is an ‘airy’ chakra, not a bodily chakra, like the other ones, who are to open after the Night of the Soul. This top chakra has two exits. On top of the skull, and on the forehead, but not between the eyebrows, the famous third eye chakra, or Ajna-chakra.

The front-exit of the top-chakra is about 4 centimeters above the eyebrows. The ajna-chakra (between the eyebrows), is, again, not to be opened till after the Night of the Soul, like all other bodily (non ‘airy’) chakra’s too.

We don’t know why there is a period of 14 (!) years between the Kundalini and the Night of the Soul. Perhaps the top chakra is in a way preparing the body/soul for the Night of the Soul.

There is no Kundalini involved in the Night of the Soul.

2.

A correction on Letter number five. It is not Parzival, but Gawan who has to fight the lion. This makes no difference alchemically. Because Parzival, Gawan, Anfortas, Feirefiz, plus the beheaded man (Sigunes?) are all one and the same person. They all represent different stages in the Work of the Sun. One is guarding the Stone, another one figthing the lion (Night of the Soul), and yet another one is beheaded.

3.

On your question, mister Gardiner: (on being gay) is that the one sided male, or rather ‘the place between’?

Our gay man is, as we wrote earlier, Anfortas too. Meaning that he has that mysterious pain in his left testicle. That pain started a few months before his Kundalini. It is described by von Eschenbach in his Parzival. Especcialy the part about the wound getting cold as ice is correct (there is no visible wound on our gay man though).

During the months that lead up to the resurrection the pain gets worse and worse. In the end he had difficulties of walking even. This pain made it impossible for our man to have sex. And there we have the famous sperm-saving-theory from Tantra.

Now, we don’t think you can simply raise the Kundalini-snake by not having sex for a few months. The gate to Paradise would be very public indeed then. But it is somehow needed too, that ‘not wasting sperm’.

Our theory: the stone is either also composed of libido (pychic energy) saved in those months, or the saved libido is the ‘fuel’ to the Kundalini (not only needing that/ see our remark about the Gate to Paradise). We don’t know. The odd thing though is that after the resurrection the pain is lowered, but it stays there (even till today).

This might mean the following thing: we once heard that in a physical hermaphrodite (and our man is not a physical hermaphrodite, he’s built normally/ we think the original mythical hermaphrodite is describing microcosmic balance of the male and female and that this term is later used by doctors of medicine to name a physically mixed up human being), that in a physical hermaphrodite the left testicle is often missing, but the left ovarium is there (in the body ofcourse). So, the left testicle in our gay man is perhaps the microcosmic left ovarium. And shakti (Kundalini) is said to be female. Perhaps the microcosmic female ovarium in our gay man doesn’t tolerate the female shakti (++ gives repulsion + – attraction).

Although, that doesn’t explain why the pain started months before Kundalini. Perhaps the shakti was growing because he was not getting orgasms anymore. And in him that (the increase of shakti/the female force) would result in the famous testicle-pain, because he possesses that famous balance in male/female forces. Just sharing this with you. We don’t understand this either,
what is causing what?

But what about The Gospel of Thomas, 114? Simon Peter said to them, “Make Mary leave us, for females don’t deserve life.” Jesus said, “Look, I will guide her to make her male, so that she too may become a living spirit resembling you males. For every female who makes herself male will enter the kingdom of Heaven.”

In other words: can’t females be resurrected because the microcosmic female (Kundalini) wouldn’t be tolerated in the macrocosmic female?

People are very uneasy with this logon. We understand. So are we. That uneasy even, that some say ‘this logon is added to the Gospel’ without giving evidence to that adding. We feel that we had to discuss the logon within the stuff on the resurrection nevertheless.

4.

Then, you asked us whether ‘we would recommend the use of drugs as part of the process’
(of resurrection).

Philip, the grail is not on drugs.

5.

A little metallic like wheel (like in a clock) starts to spin in the decapitated head, either on the left side, or the right side (our gay man doesn’t remember), near the ear and then, spinning fast, makes a 90 degree move to the forehead. (We can’t help thinking about Revelation/ the sign on the foreheads.)

6.

One is on the floor during resurrection and if one wakes up the next morning one discovers that one is firmly attached to the floor at two points: the coccyx and the back of the head. (So the spine is ‘straight’ and the snake can escape through a ‘straight’ spine?) It took our gay man 30 minutes to free himself. The coccyx was very painfull for days.

7.

The answer to the question: which God was conceived through homosexual union: Thot, the later Hermes. Father of Alchemy.

Pellerano has that story on dragonkeypress:

“Sexual Magick cites another incident in Egyptian Myth where Seth lusts after his brother Horus and seduces him. Horus stealthily applies the sperm of Seth onto a lettuce, the preferred food of Seth. Seth eats the lettuce, is impregnated thereby and gives birth to Thoth.”

“Thoth, conceived through homosexual union, dually represents the creative act that is both divine and artistic, especially in relation to literature. Thoth is traditionally the god of wisdom, scribes, and the occult arts; he is also associated with “the Word.” The concept of “the Word” is of supreme importance in the creation myths embraced by esoteric schools of Judeo-Christianity. God is said to have uttered the words that emanated forth the spheres of creation. Language and godly powers are closely related in mysticism. This concept is resonant in the sacred or generative powers attributed to alphabets such as Hebrew and Sanskrit.”

“Since alchemy is generally suspected to have originated in Egypt, Egyptian mythology is particularly pertinent to alchemical lore. The Greek personification of Thoth, who features highly in the art of alchemy, elucidates the connection even further. For the alchemist, Thoth is the equivalent of the all-encompassing genius, Hermes Trismegistus. Trismegistus was said to be the greatest of all kings, priests, and philosophers; and was, if viewed vis-à-vis the Egyptian myth, the product of homosexual love.”

8.

We (and that includes our gay man) in Letter number four said that we never saw the source manuscripts of the New Testament. So how can our gay man ensure us (because that’s what we write too) that ‘most of the manuscripts is found back in the parabels of ‘Jesus’ about the Kingdom of God’?

Our gay man was informed about the manuscripts in emails in 2000, just before his night of the soul. By a mailer on an alchemy-website. This man informed him that the manuscripts were packed with alchemy in farmer-allegory (like in the Gospel). But how, you will ask, did our gay man know so sure that his informant was speaking the truth? He didn’t. But he decided to trust him because of a very odd incident. A very odd incident indeed.

For that anonymous mailer could tell our gay man about his sexual fetish. A thing our gay man had only shared with a few lovers. And it was our gay man who contacted the mailer, not the other way around. Because if it would have been the other way around, it could simply have been an ex-boy-friend having a pratical joke ofcourse.

Our gay man admits that he is, therefor, not absolutely sure about the theory on the manuscripts from 120 BCE, but that he trusted the man’s statement, because he could tell precisely about his (our gay man’s) deepest sexual feelings. The header of the email in which the informer told our gay man about his feelings was ‘Adam Kadmon will give you a foot, instead of a hand.’

9.

(taken from a Forum)

“Researchers found that the shape of the human skull has changed significantly over the past 650 years. Modern people possess less prominent features, but higher foreheads than our medieval ancestors. Writing in the Britsh Dental Journal, the team took careful measurements of groups of skulls spanning across 30 generations. The scientists said the differences between past and present skull shapes were “striking”.”

In the Forbidden Letters it is said that he ‘who overcomes’ the aggression impulses of the Night of the Soul will successfully produce the lightbody. You need higher brain function (neo cortex) to ride that bull of aggression impulses, and it is said in The Letters that Alchemy is the “end goal”of evolution too.

10.

One of us has read in literature about 15 years ago that ‘Melchisedek opened the earth for Christ’ (it’s a detail on Melchisedek not given in the Bible). Christ has descended too in the earth, only here, Christianity says, to ‘free souls’. This is, in our view, pollution of the Gospel. Orthodoxy that couldn’t ‘fill in’ the-descending-into-the-earth-theme’ (alchemy) and came up with the soul-theory.

Now, it is said of Melchisedek that Christ ‘is priest after the rule of Melchisedek’. What is meant here? We brainstormed. That Melchisedek is in our view the ‘microcosmic, alchemical law’, after which the great work has to be performed. He’s made into a person in myth. So Melchisedek the alchemical structure in the body, the law, if you want. The Phoenix is the human body in the first phase of alchemy (resurrection), and the christ the completed, deified body after the second phase (night of the soul).

11.

Let’s have a closer look at the foot washing. And why? We are to reveal some more of the sexual preference of our gay man. And you’ll be astonished, as we were once too.

Remember what we said about ‘Adam Kadmon will give you a foot, instead of a hand.’

There is a very odd story in history. It is supposed to have originated in the first century. We were never able to trace the story in literature. And that’s a weak point. But we are begging for your attention nevertheless.

How do we know about that odd story? Our secretary (the one who gives our English a last boost and sends the emails to you from public computers) had coffee at the end of the eighties with the parents of a friend of his. They were shocked because of an incident that happened on television the other night. They told that (on a evangelical) talk-show somebody told a very strange little story. It went like this: The Son of God descended from heaven, saw Adam, loved Adam, kneeled down, kissed his feet and tickled (!) his feet. End of story.

Our friend wondered how this ‘gay’ story could have been broadcasted by Christians, and found out that it was a live program. It couldn’t be cut. We, unfortunately, are not allowed to name the country and the program, we don’t want give away the home country of our secretary. You understand.

Now, keep all this in mind and let’s look at the foot washing. It’s only brought by ‘John’, who’s the only one who has ‘the beloved disciple’. Why did Jesus wash feet? Not for reasons of hygiene. Because the meal was over already when he started to wash the feet. And this is very important: nowhere it is told why the disciples should was feet at all. They are told to wash because Jesus is Lord, and they were servant. But why they should was in the first place, it is not explained. And John knows that too. The ‘but thou shalt know hereafter’ in our opinion is 2000 years later.

Here we go:

The Gospel According to Saint John
John 13: Chapter 13

13:1 Now before the feast of the passover, when Jesus knew that his hour was come that he should depart out of this world unto the Father, having loved his own which were in the world, he loved them unto the end.

13:2 And supper being ended (ended !), the devil having now put into the heart of Judas Iscariot, Simon’s son, to betray him;

13:3 Jesus knowing that the Father had given all things into his hands, and that he was come from God, and went to God;

13:4 He riseth from supper, and laid aside his garments; and took a towel, and girded himself.

13:5 After that he poureth water into a bason, and began to wash the disciples’ feet, and to wipe them with the towel wherewith he was girded.

13:6 Then cometh he to Simon Peter: and Peter saith unto him, Lord, dost thou wash my feet?

13:7 Jesus answered and said unto him, What I do thou knowest not now; but thou shalt know hereafter.

13:8 Peter saith unto him, Thou shalt never wash my feet. Jesus answered him, If I wash thee not, thou hast no part with me. [What is ‘Jesus’ saying here?]

13:9 Simon Peter saith unto him, Lord, not my feet only, but also my hands and my head.

13:10 Jesus saith to him, He that is washed needeth not save to wash his feet, but is clean every whit: and ye are clean, but not all.

13:11 For he knew who should betray him; therefore said he, Ye are not all clean.

13:12 So after he had washed their feet, and had taken his garments, and was set down again, he said unto them, Know ye what I have done to you?

13:13 Ye call me Master and Lord: and ye say well; for so I am.

13:14 If I then, your Lord and Master, have washed your feet; ye also ought to wash one another’s feet.

13:15 For I have given you an example, that ye should do as I have done to you.

13:16 Verily, verily, I say unto you, The servant is not greater than his lord; neither he that is sent greater than he that sent him.

13:17 If ye know these things, happy are ye if ye do them.

12.

Summarizing the resurrection.

1978 : Pope John Paul (de labore solis = of the work of the sun) comes to power. During his reign 90% of the work of the sun in our gay man is taking place.

March 1986 : testicle-pain starts (the work of the sun starts)

July 1986 : testicle-pain is at his height and stays at his height till a about a week after the resurrection (September 4 1986)

End of august till September 4 1986 : our gay man becomes a child. That is, psychologically during certain minutes. During those minutes, and to his own surprise, he even produces a child’s voice. (pupulus nudus means the naked young boy and this reminds us of the words of Jesus too: you must become like a little child again if you want to enter the Kingdom of God.)

September 4 1986 (little after midnight ‘silentio noctis’ ( in the silence of the night): resurrection.

a) Our man is on the floor on his back. He had his eyes closed during the whole resurrection. A ‘thread’ (very thin) is closing around his neck. The head is decapitated by that ‘thread’.

b) The stone is produced about where the liver is. The stone ignites the Kundalini fire (the fire can actually be heard) and starts to move about, increasingly violently. Fire getting stronger. Arms and legs break into pieces.

c) The snake is driven out. Our friend doesn’t know where it went. Up the spine, but after that: no clue. (Into the earth?)

d) The wheel starts to spin and is raised to the forehead.

e) One starts to descend into the earth. After 2 minutes our man ‘fell asleep’ or passed out in another hypnagogic way. Hypnagogic, because he couldn’t remember that moment the morning after. If you lose consciousness you remember. So he ‘fell asleep’.

f) 10.30 in the morning. He woke up. Coccyx and back of the head firmly attached to the floor. As said before, it took him about 30 minutes to free himself.

g) September 5 1986 : the top-chakra opens.

13.

October 2000 : the night of the Soul starts.

November 2001 : the lightbody starts to grow.

Springs 2005 : The lightbody is already very strong. Pope John Paul dies. The bulk of the Work of the Sun is performed during his reign ‘of the work of the sun’/ ‘de labore solis’.

Ratzinger then becomes Pope. The last pope, and he has the slogan: gloria olivae (the glory of the olive tree: the Tree of Life (spine and brain)). So gloria olivae: the sons of God revealed with the becoming visible of the lightbody. The harvest (“if everything is strong enough, you will have your harvest”).

There is an extra Pope, Petrus Romanus, in the list of Maleachi, but he is not clearly identified as a pope. We don’t know how to solve this Petrus Romanus problem. Because surely, history as we know it (and that includes churchianity without a doubt) shall stop after the revelation of the sons of God. Not?

The Paris 4

The Forbidden Letters – Newsletter 1

Newsletter 1 on the Forbidden Letters
by Paris 4</CLASS=”Q”></CLASS=”Q”></CLASS=”Q”>

Dear Visitors of World Mysteries,
Ladies and Gentlemen,
As the Paris 4 we have been following the international discussion on the Forbidden Letters, as you may understand. And we feel we have to bring in some balance.
Balance when it comes to homosexuality being a conditio sine qua non for alchemy in particular.
Because we have seen many people worried on Forums about that part. People who ask themselves: can’t we be saved, because we are not homosexual?
Let us just correct that here and now.
We have that information on homosexuality from the man we described in paragraphe 8 of part 2 of the Letters.
Here is the part.
“We (and that includes our gay man) in Letter number four said that we never saw the source manuscripts of the New Testament. So how can our gay man ensure us (because that’s what we write too) that ‘most of the manuscripts is found back in the parabels of ‘Jesus’ about the Kingdom of God’?
Our gay man was informed about the manuscripts in emails in 2000, just before his night of the soul. By a mailer on an alchemy-website. This man informed him that the manuscripts were packed with alchemy in farmer-allegory (like in the Gospel). But how, you will ask, did our gay man know so sure that his informant was speaking the truth? He didn’t. But he decided to trust him because of a very odd incident. A very odd incident indeed.
For that anonymous mailer could tell our gay man about his sexual fetish. A thing our gay man had only shared with a few lovers. And it was our gay man who contacted the mailer, not the other way around. Because if it would have been the other way around, it could simply have been an ex-boy-friend having a pratical joke ofcourse.
Our gay man admits that he is, therefor, not absolutely sure about the theory on the manuscripts from 120 BCE, but that he trusted the man’s statement, because he could tell precisely about his (our gay man’s) deepest sexual feelings.”
It was this man who said to our gay man that ‘only certain homosexuals posess the necessary balance of the microcosmic male and female to safely conduct the kundalini-fire’.
We failed to point that out. If one just reads the Letters and part 2 as published, one might think that we had some kind of ‘divine revelation’ on this.
Which brings us to the article by the CE2.
“Alchemy is not only the ‘goal of evolution’, as the Paris 4 say, it is on top the one force that fights entropy. And is thereby evolution proper.
Another important detail on alchemy that wasn’t mentioned by the Paris 4 in the Letters is the alchemical saying ‘You need Gold, to make Gold’. Important, because we wouldn’t be surprised if it is fetched by some, for the benefit of many…
(And would they be called solar heroes? Microscosmic solar heroes? They would indeed!)”
We are more than sympathetic to that quote.
Then, this newsletter gives us the opportunity to react on the excellent article by
Mr. Otto Reich too.

The part about Fulcanelli:
In The Gnostic Science of Alchemy, chapter 12, Vincent Bridges writes
“And so, at long last, we arrive at the point where Fulcanelli began, the Gothic Cathedrals of Europe. In his 1926 masterpiece, The Mystery of the Cathedrals, Fulcanelli claimed that the Gothic Cathedrals were Hermetic libraries in stone with the secret of alchemy displayed for all who could read it. When our investigation began, this seemed, in its own way, the most incredible of all Fulcannelli’s claims. It was easier to believe that someone had stumbled privately onto the real secret behind the alchemical
transformation, than it was to believe that some secret society, or societies, had encoded this information deliberately into the design and the decorations of the greatest of all Christian monuments.
For this to be true, several important preconditions would also have to be true, such as the existence of a secret, or not so secret, group with access to the highest levels of the church, bottomless wealth, connections with the Holy Land and the Moslem world, and knowledge of the inner core of alchemy.”
“(Otto Reich:)One is tempted to think for a moment that the Paris 4 are exactly such a ‘secret, or not so secret group’. And if they are, this group would then be at least as old as the French Cathedrals.”
We are in no way connected to Fulcanelli. His riddle is, in our opinion, correctly explained by Reich, and the Notre Dame indeed has alchemy encoded (like many other French cathedrals). But we are not connected to Fulcanelli, or to any other group, secret, or not so secret. We are simply the four friends of the gay man.(Although the Fulcanelli-theory is correct in our view of course, that alchemy is about the End of Time).
Yet, the question arises now of course: is September 4th 1986 and the things that are, according to us, going to happen in the not so far future a fulfillment of the Hendaye Cross and the theory of Jay Weidner and Vincent Bridges? We don’t know.
Then, we are sympathetic to this quote too:
“The Paris 4 are all heterosexual too. And quite enjoying their mission at the same time. That might just mean not all is lost when you’re heterosexual. That only certain homosexuals, like that gay man, are perhaps capable of fetching the Gold of Immortality, but that it is fetched at the same time for the benefit of all, as the CE2 say. And isn’t the Alchemist in the end a Christ? And isn’t a Christ a saviour? In other words: I feel quite relaxed about all this.”
(Our gay man likes to point out though that it is not a human who saves, but the alchemist, so beautifully called ‘the only living god’. The ‘god within’. Our gay man feels like an ‘object’ in all this. He points out that he is of the opinion that he had no active part in the past 20 years of his Work of the Sun. It was all done by the ‘inner alchemist’ he says. It is the alchemist that saves, not the vessel, meaning our gay man.)
And we think this quote, from the Reich article, makes sense too.
“Reading the Forbidden Letters, all of a sudden the mystery seems solved why Kundalini-awakenings in the past didn’t lead to physical lightbodies and physical immortality. And why, in teachings on alchemy, that lightbody was gradually turned into an after-death-body and physical immortality into
soul-immortality or a prolonged life. (Only certain Tamil schools still stick to their teachings on physical immortality.) – Because a Kundalini-awakening is not yet the Work of the Sun.
You apparently need the whole thing. To produce that stone, to be decapitated, to have that wheel
raised in the head and to descend into the earth. All the things described in the Great Work of Alchemy apparently have to happen to you.(…) The Kundalini-awakening will be a vital part of the Great Work, but on itself without a doubt only a sub-atomic phenomenon, although a potentially
extremely dangerous one.”
And please, dear Visitors of World Mysteries, remember what Mariette points out, quoted in the Hanno Temming article:
‘There is nothing any of us can do that would change the metaphysical destination of our world in general, or of any human being in particular. It is very important to realize that the alchemical process is utterly autonomous.’
Whether our Pope-theory is correct, or not, we all simply have to wait. Our gay man, you, and we too.
With our warmest wishes to you all,

The Paris 4.
Paris, October 26, 2006.

 

The Forbidden Letters – Newsletter 2

Newsletter 2 on the Forbidden Letters
by Paris 4</CLASS=”Q”></CLASS=”Q”></CLASS=”Q”></CLASS=”Q”>

Paris, October 2007

Dear Mr. Osborn,
Dear Gary,

We discovered why Philip called us fraudulent and psychotic in the summer of 2006. Two weeks after we first contacted you in 2005 we received an email by somebody from Phil’s Forum who warned us and said Philip couldn’t be trusted. That worried us of course. You too warned us that Phil couldn’t be trusted (plagiarism). We decided to put him to the test by inventing a character, meaning a second alchemist. A person claiming he had the same experience our gay man had. We used the Latin text as a spill, that person saying ‘I’m pretty sure I live in the same town as your gay man.’ – This was daring of course, because we don’t know whether possibly more alchemists exist at this moment.

And we didn’t want to blur the knowledge we sent to you on alchemy. But then we all decided that a possible second alchemist is not a threat to the alchemy itself and had our fictional alchemist mail Philip. It then showed, we still regret to say, that Philip did not past our little tests: he produced two fabrications and twice didn’t do what he promised to do.

Last week we found out that this little email-correspondence was the reason he later called us fraudulent and psychotic. Because he contacted the British Secret Service (you know about that) through a friend who then checked our IP’s. And of course every email (including the one by our fictional alchemist) came from one and the same city, being the city of our secretary. And they all came from about 10 public different computers. So it was discovered that IP’s of the Paris 4 were matching the very IP’s of the fictional alchemist. And then he jumped to his conclusion.

Now, the conclusion was partly correct: that second alchemist didn’t exist, but we were surprised that

a) he didn’t contact us to confront us (was his request to the Secret Service illegal and that the reason why he couldn’t disclose his info?)

b) he didn’t understand that the fictional alchemist could have used the same public computers we used (after all, that fictional alchemist already said in his mail that he was pretty sure he was in the same city as our secretary).

Anyway, this email gives us the possibility to react on a few other things as well.

1) New York is in no way involved. We don’t know how that Washington Arch entered the (very excellent!!!) response articles on WM (through the CE2-riddle?), but we have no connection with New York. We’re all in Europe.

2) A friend of Graham Hancock suggested that we are a ‘much larger group’. We are not. We are surprised that people can’t simply accept 4 Parisians, an alchemist and a ‘secretary’ helping us with translating.

3) The ligthbody of our gay man is still growing. But we have surprising details contradicting the assumptions of the spiritual world on that body. Since spring 2007 the big chakra’s are slowly disappearing. The little ones in the hand, arms, legs (back of knees), and under the feet have disappeared already since over a year. But to our surprise the large ones are disappearing too. The only bodily chakra that is still active is the heart-chakra. The head-chakra’s though are still active like on day one (they opened not after 2001, but on September 5 1986, as you will recall). They are steady. No change. They can become a little bit stronger and then weaker again now and then, but this change is the same since 1986.

It appears then that the bodily chakra’s are possibly only phases, and will not show up in the end-product, the Lightbody. That they do their work, but after that disappear. This is new. We found that nowhere in literature. But of course, there is the possibility that they will return again, or show up in the Lightbody in the end again. But for now they are silent for months. And the minor chakra’s for over a year.

The Lightbody is by now so strong that there are strong ‘electrical’ currents in his body, mainly in his hands. If for instance he washes his hands in warm water then the current becomes so strong that the hand starts to pulsate. The pulsation cannot be seen though, but he can feel it.

4) In two alchemical texts we once found the phase of torture. We always thought that was an exaggeration, pointing to unpleasant moments in either the phase of Resurrection, or the Night of the Soul. But we think we know now what that word stands for. In March the heart-chakra started to work in a new, very painful way, for almost 24 hours. Our gay man was that much ‘tortured’ that he even contemplated going to a hospital. But he was afraid of that too, because the physicians would ask questions, or want to make scans. And he wished to remain hidden.

It fortunately all stopped after 24 hours. And didn’t return till September (2007) with two less violent attacks. The first about 12 hours, the second about 10 hours. He said he had never had so much pain in his life and that he couldn’t have imagined before that a human body could produce so much pain. So the phase of torture seems to exist and seems to point to a certain phase of the transforming work the heart-chakra does.

5) We have an amusing (and possibly childish) story we decided to share with you and the public. Our gay man last summer asked himself whether he was the only one who had produced the Stone. He had done that before, contemplating the possibility of more alchemists being on earth right now. But now, in a funny moment, he did something which he had once read in book about magic: if you want to know the answer to a question: open up a big book with your eyes closed and point down on the page given and then you might get a hint. But first things first:

The life of our gay man, in spite of the fact that he has a very down to earth mentality, has many strange coincidences. We are talking about the period before 1986 here. Two numbers were somehow in his mind from childhood. The numbers 171 and 172. But not those numbers exactly. These numbers could turn up in different ways. And a zero didn’t matter. So 100072 was valid, and so was 7110. Or 117. It was not untill September 1986 that he discovered that his birthday was under that number too (January 17th being 17.1). Now, there are three important data till now in his life: his birth (171), his resurrection (September 4 1986/ we couldn’t make anything of that date) and the starting point of the Night of the Soul: October 7 2000 which is 7 10 2000 = 712). Keep this all in mind.

Back to our story now. He opened a big book blindly, being a German dictionary, the Duden (1996 edition). He pressed down blindly and interestingly pressed down on the word ‘hindruecken’, which means ‘to press down’. That had us laughing of course.

A few hours later he went to bed and as he was about to fall asleep, something in his mind urged him to open that dictionary again. He first refused, but the feeling came back and back. He then left his bed and opened the book and looked at ‘hindruecken’ again. Only to find out that, like in the afternoon, he was not pressing down ‘hindruecken’. ‘Hindruecken’ was the word that appeared above his nail. In other words, he had been pointing at ‘hindruecken’ but pressing down the word below. And that word was: Hindu, a Hindu. Coincidence you will say, but here comes the kicker: the page on which he was pressing down was 712, with 711 on the back…

For what it’s worth (at least a smile, we’re sure).

The Paris 4.

 

The Forbidden Letters – Newsletter 3

Newsletter 3 on the Forbidden Letters
by Paris 4</CLASS=”Q”></CLASS=”Q”></CLASS=”Q”></CLASS=”Q”>

Paris, August 2009.</CLASS=”Q”></CLASS=”Q”>

Dear Visitors of World-Mysteries,

Here is our small, but possibly important third Newsletter.

In our second Newsletter we wrote:

“The ligthbody of our gay man is still growing. But we have surprising details contradicting the assumptions of the spiritual world on that body. Since spring 2007 the big chakra’s are slowly disappearing. The little ones in the hand, arms, legs (back of knees), and under the feet have disappeared already since over a year. But to our surprise the large ones are disappearing too. The only bodily chakra that is still active is the heart-chakra. The head-chakra’s though are still active like on day one (they opened not after 2001, but on September 5 1986, as you will recall). They are steady. No change. They can become a little bit stronger and then weaker again now and then, but this change is the same since 1986.”

&

“In two alchemical texts we once found the phase of torture. We always thought that was an exaggeration, pointing to unpleasant moments in either the phase of Resurrection, or the Night of the Soul. But we think we know now what that word stands for. In March the heart-chakra started to work in a new, very painful way, for almost 24 hours. Our gay man was that much ‘tortured’ that he even contemplated going to a hospital. But he was afraid of that too, because the physicians would ask questions, or want to make scans. And he wished to remain hidden.

It fortunately all stopped after 24 hours. And didn’t return till September (2007) with two less violent attacks. The first about 12 hours, the second about 10 hours. He said he had never had so much pain in his life and that he couldn’t have imagined before that a human body could produce so much pain. So the phase of torture seems to exist and seems to point to a certain phase of the transforming work the heart-chakra does. “

That was almost two years ago. We have more news on that. The ‘torture’ returns in a irregular pattern. Sometimes two times a month, sometimes not for months. The other bodily chakra’s are still silent or almost silent, but the one chakra (of the heart) that is situated where the diaphragm is situated is always the center of pain. It is from here that the attacks are orchestrated and the pain spreads out. (After an attack our gay man is very exhausted.)

Here we have a picture of the diaphragm. It is just below the lungs and the heart. Right where the heart chakra is.

This is strange, but maybe not. Because we once read a curious remark by, if we remember well, Jung (but, again, we are not sure). He said that the Ancient Greeks thought that the psyche (=soul) was not in the brain, but that it is situated where the diaphragm is.

And in ‘Depth Psychology’ Dennis Patrick Slattery says:

‘Freud’s understanding seems to me close to that of the Ancient Greeks who located psyche (=soul) in the diaphragm.’ [ Depth Psychology: Meditations in the Field, Second Editionalt
also available from http://www.daimon.ch/ ].

For what it’s worth,

And with our warmest wishes,

The Paris 4.

Paris, August 2009.

 

The Forbidden Letters – Newsletter 4

Newsletter 4 on the Forbidden Letters
by Paris 4</CLASS=”Q”></CLASS=”Q”></CLASS=”Q”></CLASS=”Q”>

Paris, December 2009.

Dear Visitors of World Mysteries,

Our gay man decided to inform the readers of the Forbidden Letters about something that happened in his youth and that might be important in respect to the Great Work. When our gay man was five years old he was playing ‘household’ with his sister. They used several items from the drawing room to fake a kitchen in which they would ‘cook.’ In one item, a little jar that was on the piano, there was, as his mother told him later, a needle. And not a small one, as she said later. Our gay man apparently swallowed that needle while pretending that he was drinking fluid from it during ‘diner.’ The moment he had swallowed that needle his mother came in and questioned him. She found the jar empty and then wanted to bring him to the hospital. Our gay man remembers though that he said to his mother that he had only swallowed spaghetti (Our gay man is surprised here too, remembering this). His mother took him to hospital nevertheless.

He was operated, and a few days later he was dreaming at night that his operation-wound opened. What he saw was the following thing: first a globe (earth in space) appeared, slowly turning in the open wound. Then a baby appeared and it turned into a young man (a man he later recognized when he was in grammar-school and fell in love with!!!). Then the head of the young man came off. Something in his dream caught fire, but he can’t remember what: the head, the young man, the baby, or planet earth. The funny thing as we found out later was that he saw that globe as it was photographed only years after by Apollo-crew: a beautiful big blue ball:

Now, the scar of this operation leads from the navel to three centimeters under where the sternum begins.

(You can see the sternum here (on top of the liver/the bone in the center of the rib-cage) as well as the liver itself.)

Now, children have a very lively mind. There memories can be totally wrong. But there is alchemical symbolism in his dream, and it might just be possible that not a needle was removed but the Stone of Alchemy put in. This sounds outrageous. It would mean that stone is macrocosmic too, and that possibly his mother knew about this, but at least the surgeon. (Possibly his mother, because it is possible that he swallowed a needle indeed through ‘destiny’. That destiny, in other words, took care of the fact that he would be on an operation-table to receive the Stone.) But the staff (or at least the surgeon) would be involved in this plan (not?).

We decided to take this all to World Mysteries (in spite of the fact that it sound all very Omen-like), because it is coincidental that the very man who ‘produced’ the Stone of transmuation produced that in a place that was accesible for the surgeon (‘just about where the liver is’).

For what it’s worth,

and with our warmest wishes to you all,

The Paris 4

Paris, December 2, 2009.

* * *

 

 

On the Forbidden Letters – by H.K.

Dear Mr. Gardiner,

This image is my response to the Forbidden Letters by the Paris 4.

Click on the image to enlarge.

NOVUS ORDO SECLORUM & NOVA ATLANTIS / NEW ORDER OF THE AGES & NEW ATLANTIS are intimately connected.

Conspiracy thinkers say: Wake up!
New agers say: Awake!

“The endgoal of evolution is alchemy.” write the Paris 4.

Modern secret societies with ancient roots (Authority) are fighting evolution to prevent spiritual alchemy.


ANTICHRIST SYMBOLISM COMPARED WITH THE ALCHEMICAL CADUCEUS
AND THE RELATION TO A NEW WORLD ORDER
Click on the image to enlarge.

The vision of the New World Order is Hell on Earth. The elite is trying to imprison humanity in a dualistic, hierarchical, competition-based and material reality.

While due to the forces of evolution, humanity is ascending toward a unified, co-creation-based immaterialistic reality where all is one, a New Atlantis.

The heart attracts reality.
The conciousness locks it.

Any reality we can imagine is possible.

We are currently physical reincarnations, while actually we are free spirited souls.

The coming battle will not be between races or religions or nations.. it will be a battle between Good and Evil, between Freemdom and Authority, between Truth and Betrayal… between the very dualistic forces of the Universe and is therefore a battle of God.

Click on the image to enlarge.

The Forbidden Letters have opened my eyes to a whole new reality.

In Lakesh,

H.K.

The Aztec calendar is the calendar system that was used by the Aztecs as well as other Pre-Columbian peoples of central Mexico. It is one of the Mesoamerican calendars, sharing the basic structure of calendars from throughout ancient Mesoamerica. The calendar consisted of a 365-day calendar cycle called xiuhpohualli (year count) and a 260-day ritual cycle called tonalpohualli (day count). These two cycles together formed a 52-year "century," sometimes called the "calendar round." The xiuhpohualli is considered to be the agricultural calendar, since it is based on the sun, and the tonalpohualli is considered to be the sacred calendar.


The photograph to the right is the Aztec Calendar, on display at the Museo Nacional de Antropologia in Mexico City, Mexico.  The original object is a 12 feet, massive stone slab, carved in the middle of the 15th century. Many renditions of it exist and have existed through the years and throughout Mexico.

Aztec Calendar

The graphic image below shows the Aztec Calendar, on display at the Museo Nacional de Antropologia in Mexico City, Mexico. The original object is a 12 feet, massive stone slab, carved in the middle of the 15th century. Many renditions of it exist and have existed through the years and throughout Mexico.

Historically, the Aztec name for the huge basaltic monolith is Cuauhxicalli Eagle Bowl, but it is universally known as the Aztec Calendar or Sun Stone. 
It was during the reign of the 6th Aztec monarch in 1479 that this stone was carved and dedicated to the principal Aztec deity: the sun. The stone has both mythological and astronomical significance. It weighs almost 25 tons, has a diameter of just under 12 feet, and a thickness of 3 feet.
On December 17th, 1760 the stone was discovered, buried in the "Zocalo" (the main square) of Mexico City. The viceroy of New Spain at the time was don Joaquin de Monserrat, Marquis of Cruillas. Afterwards it was embedded in the wall of the Western tower of the metropolitan Cathedral, where it remained until 1885. At that time it was transferred to the national Museum of Archaeology and History by order of the then President of the Republic, General Porfirio Diaz.


Did You Know?

A particular tzolkin/haab date recurs every 18,980 days, whereas a long count date (assuming that the long count starts over at 0.0.0.0.0 on reaching 13.0.0.0.0) recurs every 1,872,000 days (once in 5,125.37 years). The combination of a long count date and a tzolkin/haab date occurs only once every 136,656,000 days (approximately 374,152 years or 73 Maya eras).

The Mayan Calendar conversion applet below gives the following dates:
Start of the Mayan calendar (long count cycle):  0.0.0.0.0 [ 4 Ahau 8 Cumku ] is Aug 10, 3113 BC
End of the Mayan calendar (long count cycle): 13.0.0.0.0 [ 4 Ahau 3 Kankin ] is Dec 21, 2012 AD


AZTEC VS. MAYAN CALEDARS

The Aztec Calendar was basically similar to that of the Maya. The ritual day cycle was called Tonalpohualli and was formed, as was the Mayan Tzolkin, by the concurrence of a cycle of numerals 1 through 13 with a cycle of 20 day names, many of them similar to the day names of the Maya.

Where the Aztec differed most significantly from the Maya was in their more primitive number system and in their less precise way of recording dates. Normally, they noted only the day on which an event occurred and the name of the current year. This is ambiguous, since the same day, as designated in the way mentioned above, can occur twice in a year. Moreover, years of the same name recur at 52-year intervals, and Spanish colonial annals often disagree as to the length of time between two events. Other discrepancies in the records are only partially explained by the fact that different towns started their year with different months. The most widely accepted correlation of the calendar of Tenochtitlan with the Christian Julian calendar is based on the entrance of Cortez into that city on November 8, 1519, and on the surrender of Cuauhtzmoc on August 13, 1521. According to this correlation, the first date was a day 8 Wind, the ninth day of the month Quecholli, in a year 1 Reed, the 13th year of a cycle.

The Mexicans, as all other Meso-Americans, believed in the periodic destruction and re-creation of the world. The "Calendar Stone" in the Museo Nacional de Antropologia (National Museum of Anthropology) in Mexico City depicts in its central panel the date 4 Ollin (movement), on which they anticipated that their current world would be destroyed by earthquake, and within it the dates of previous holocausts: 4 Tiger, 4 Wind, 4 Rain, and 4 Water.

The Aztec calendar kept two different aspects of time; tonalpohualli and xiuhpohualli. Each of these systems had a different purpose.

The tonalpohualli was the ‘counting of days.’ It originated by ancient peoples observing that the sun, crossed a certain zenith point near the Mayan city of Copan, every 260 days. So this first system is arranged in a 260-day cycle. These 260 days were then broken up into 20 periods, with each period containing 13 days, called trecenas. Each period was given the name of something that was then shown by a hieroglyphic sign, and each trecena was given a number 1-13. Each trecena is also thought to have a god or deity presiding over each of the trecena. They kept these counts in tonalamatls, screenfold books made from bark paper.

The Aztecs used this as a religious calendar. Priests used the calendar to determine luck days for such activities as sowing crops, building houses, and going to war.

The xiuhpohualli was the ‘counting of the years.’ This calendar was kept on a 365-day solar count. This was also the agricultural and ceremonial calendar of the Aztec state. It was divided into 18 periods, with each period containing 20 days, called veintenas. This left five days that were not represented. These were called "nemontemi." These were the five transition days between the old and the new year, and were considered days of nothing. This was a time of festivals. People came to the festivals with their best clothes on, and took part in singing and dancing. This is also when the priest would preform sacrifices, most of these sacrifices were human, but others were preformed on animals and fruit.

The solar year was the basis for the civil calendar by which the Mexicas (Aztecs) determined the myriad ceremonies and rituals linked to agricultural cycles. The calendar was made up of 18 months, each lasting 20 days. The months were divided into four five-day weeks. The year was rounded out to 365 days by the addition of the five-day nemontemi (empty days), an omnious period marked by the cessation of normal activities and general abstinence. The correlation of dates in the Gregorian calendar is uncertain, although most authors on the subject affix the beginning of the Aztec year to early Febuary. A variety of sources were consulted in developing the following chart of some of the ritualistic activities associated with each month.

Many of the Aztecs’ religious ceremonies, including frequent human sacrifices, were performed at the Great Temple, located in the center of their capital city of Tenochtitlan.

Every 52 years the tonalpohualli and the xiuhpohualli calendars would align. This marked what was known as a mesoamerican "century." Every one of these centuries was marked by xiuhmolpilli – Binding Up of the Years or the New Fire Ceremony.

This was a festival that lasted 12 days and included fasting as a symbol of penitence. At the beginning of this festival all the lights in the city were extinguished – people let their hearth fires go out.

Then on midnight of the 12th day of the festival, a prisoner was taken to the priest. The priest would watch in the night sky for the star of fire to reach the zenith. Once it did, the priest would remove the heart of this man, and replace it with a piece of wood, that was laid on a piece of turquoise. This is where the priest would start the new fire that would once again light the city.

The tonalpohualli (count of days) was the sacred almanac of the Mexicas. This ritual calendar was registered in the tonalamatl (book of days), a green-fold bark paper or deerskin codex from which a priest (called tonalpouque) cast horoscopes and predicated favorable and unfavorable days of the cycle. The almanac year comprised of 260 days, each of which was assigned a date by intermeshing one of 20 day-signs, represented graphically with a gylph, and a number from 1 to13, represented by dots so that no two days in the cycle could be confused. The almanac year was thus made up of 20 13-day weeks, with the first week beginning on 1-Crocodile and ending on 13-Reed, the second week running from 1-Ocelot to 13-Deaths’ Head and so on. A god or goddess was believed to preside over each day-sign.


THE MAYAN CALENDAR

The Classic Mayan civilization was unique and left us a way to incorporate higher dimensional knowledge of time and creation. By tracking the movements of the Moon, Venus, and other heavenly bodies, the Mayans realized that there were cycles in the Cosmos. From this came their reckoning of time, and a calendar that accurately measures the solar year to within minutes.

For the Maya there was a time for everything and everything had it’s place in time. The priests could interpret the heavens and calendar. As the result they could control the daily activities of the populace. Knowing when to plant, when to harvest, the rainy and dry seasons, etc. gave them total power and control. Their comprehension of time, seasons, and cycles was immense.

The Maya understood 17 different Calendars based on the Cosmos. Some of these calendars go back as far as ten million years and are so difficult that you would need an astronomer, astrologer, geologist, and a mathematician just to work out the calculations. They also made tables predicting eclipses and the orbit of the planet Venus.

The calendars that are most important to beings of earth are the Haab, the Tun-Uc and the Tzolk’in. The Tzolk’in is the most important and the one with the most influence.

  • The Haab is based in the cycles of earth. It has 360 + 5 days, totalling 365 days. The Haab uses 18 months with 20 days in each month. There is a 19th month called a Vayeb and uses the 5 extra days. Each month has it’s own name/glyph. Each day uses a sacred sun/glyph.
  • The Tun-Uc is the moon calendar. It uses 28 day cycles that mirrors the women’s moon cycle. This cycle of the moon is broken down into 4 smaller cycles, of 7 day each. These smaller cycles are the four phases of moon cycle. 
  • The Tzolk’in is the Sacred calendar of the Maya and is based on the cycles of the Pleiadies. The cycle of the Pleiadies uses 26,000 years, but is reflected in the calendar we are using by encompassing 260 days. It uses the sacred numbers 13 and 20. The 13 represents the numbers and 20 represents the sun/glyphs. The Tzolk’in has four smaller cycles called seasons of 65 days each guarded by the four suns of Chicchan, Oc, Men and Ahau. There are also Portal days within the Tzolkin that create a double helix pattern using 52 days and the mathematics of 28. This sacred calendar is still being used for divination by the traditional Maya all over the Yucatan, Guatemala, and Belize, and Honduras. 
    The Tzolkin calendar was meshed with a 365-day solar cycle called the "Haab". The calendar consisted of 18 months with 20 days (numbered 0-19) and a short "month" of only 5 days that was called the Wayeb and was considered to be a dangerous time. It took 52 years for the Tzolkin and Haab calendars to move through a complete cycle.

Archaeologists claim that the Maya began counting time as of year 3114 B.C. 
This is called the zero year and is likened to January 1, 1 AD. All dates in the Long Count begin there, so the date of the beginning of this time cycle is written 0-0-0-0-0. 13 cycles of 394 years will have passed before the next cycle begins, which is in year 2012 A.D. (13-0-0-0-0).

Mayan Calendar Basics

The Mayas used three different calendar systems (and some variations within the systems). The three systems are known as thetzolkin (the sacred calendar), the haab (the civil calendar) and the long count system.
The tzolkin is a cycle of 260 days and the haab is a cycle of 365 days.
The tzolkin cycle and the haab cycle were combined to produce a cycle of 18,980 days, known as the calendar round. 18,980 days is a little less than 52 solar years.

The "Calendar Round" is like two gears that inter-mesh, one smaller than the other. One of the ‘gears’ is called the tzolkin, or Sacred Round. The other is the haab, or Calendar Round. The smaller wheels together represent the 260-day Sacred Round; the inner wheel, with the numbers one to thirteen, meshes with the glyphs for the 20 day names on the outer wheel. A section of a large wheel represents part of the 365-day year – 18 months of 20 days each (numbered 0-19). The five days remaining at year’s end were considered evil. In the diagram, the day shown is read 4 Ahua 8 Cumka. As the wheels turn in the direction of the arrows, in four days it will read 8 Kan 12 Cumku. Any day calculated on these cycles would not repeat for 18,980 days – 52 years.

Thus the Mayas could not simply use a tzolkin/haab date to identify a day within a period of several hundred years because there would be several days within this period with the same tzolkin/haab date.

The Mayas overcame this problem by using a third dating system which enabled them to identify a day uniquely within a period of 1,872,000 days – approximately 5,125.36 solar years. To do this they used a vigesimal (i.e. based on 20) place-value number system, analogous to our decimal place-value number system.

The Mayas used a pure vigesimal system for counting objects but modified this when counting days. In a pure vigesimal system each place in a number is occupied by a number from 0 to 19, and that number is understood as being multiplied by a power of 20. Thus in such a system:

2.3.4 = 2*20*20 + 3*20 + 4*1 = 864
  11.12.13 = 11*20*20 + 12*20 + 13*1 = 4653 and 
    1.3.5.7 = 1*20*20*20 + 3*20*20 + 5*20 + 7*1 = 9307

When counting days, however, the Mayas used a system in which the first place (as usual) had a value of 1, the second place had a value of 20, but the third place had a value not of 400 (20*20) but of 360 (18*20). (This may have been due to the fact that 360 is close to the length of the year in days.) The value of higher places continued regularly with 7,200 (20*18*20), 144,000 (20*20*18*20), etc. In such a system:

                  1.3.5.7 = 1*20*18*20 + 3*18*20 + 5*20 + 7*1 = 8,387
and 11.12.13.14.15 = 11*20*20*18*20 + 12*20*18*20 + 13*18*20 + 14*20 + 15*1
                            = 11*144,000 + 12*7,200 + 13*360 + 14*20 + 15
                            = 1,675,375.

A Maya long count date is a modified vigesimal number (as described above) composed of five places, e.g. 9.11.16.0.0, and interpreted as a count of days from some base date. There are many long count dates inscribed in the stellae and written in the codices. Calculation of the decimal equivalent of a long count yields a number of days. This is regarded as a number of days counted forward from a certain day in the past. It is the number of days since the day 0.0.0.0.0. The obvious question is: What day was used as the base date? This question has two aspects: (1) What day was used by the Mayas as the base date? (2)  What day was that in terms of the Western calendar? We shall return to these questions below.

Just as we have names (such as week) for certain periods of time, the Mayas had names for periods consisting of 20 days, 360 days, 7,200 days, etc., in accord with their modified vigesimal system of counting days. A day is known as a kin. Twenty kins make auinal, 18 uinals a tun, 20 tuns a katun and 20 katuns a baktun. Thus we have:

            1 kin    =  1 day
            1 uinal  = 20 kins   = 20 days
            1 tun    = 18 uinals = 360 days
            1 katun  = 20 tuns   = 7,200 days
            1 baktun = 20 katuns = 144,000 days

The numbers at the five places in the long count are thus counts of baktuns, etc., as follows:

baktuns . katuns . tuns . uninals . kin

Thus, for example, 9.15.9.0.1 denotes a count of 9 baktuns, 15 katuns, 9 tuns, no uinals and 1 kin, or in other words, 9*144,000 + 15*7,200 + 9*360 + 0*20 + 1*1 days, or 1,407,201 days. It is a count of days from the Maya base date of 0.0.0.0.0.

Most of the long count dates which occur in the stone inscriptions have a baktun count of 9. The period 9.0.0.0.0 through 10.0.0.0.0, the period of the Classic Maya, is now thought by scholars to coincide with the period (approximately) 436 A.D. through 829 A.D. There are, however, some strange anomalies. Morley  deciphers two long count dates (found at Palenque) as 1.18.5.4.0 and 1.18.5.3.6 (14 days apart) which are some 2,794 solar years prior to 9.0.0.0.0. Since there is no evidence that the Mayas existed before about 500 B.C., what could these early long count dates possibly be referring to?

We would expect that the next higher unit after the baktun would consist of 20 baktuns, and it appears there was such a unit, called apictun. However, no long count date occurs with a baktun count of more than 12, except that 13.0.0.0.0 occurs. A widely-accepted school of thought holds that in the Maya long count system 13.0.0.0.0 marks the beginning of a new cycle, and so is equivalent to 0.0.0.0.0. In this view, 13 baktuns make up a great cycle or, Maya era, of 13*144,000 = 1,872,000 days (approximately 5125.37 solar years).

The date 0.0.0.0.0 is equal to year 3113 B.C..

The date 13.0.0.0.0 is equal to year 2012 A.D..

Sacred Calendar – Tzolkin dates

The tzolkin, sometimes known as the sacred calendar, is a cycle of 260 days. Each tzolkin day is denoted by a combination of a number from 1 through 13 and a name from the set of twenty (in the order: Imix, Ik, Akbal, Kan ….):

   Imix       Cimi    Chuen  Cib

   Ik         Manik   Eb     Caban

   Akbal      Lamat   Ben    Edznab

   Kan        Muluc   Ix     Cauac

   Chicchan   Oc      Men    Ahau

The days cycle through the numbers and through the names independently. The sequence of tzolkin days thus runs:

            1 Imix

            2 Ik

            3 Akbal

            4 Kan

              . . .

            13 Ben

            1 Ix        (here we repeat the cycle of numbers)

            2 Men

            3 Cib

            4 Caban

            5 Edznab

            6 Cauac

            7 Ahau

            8 Imix      (here we repeat the cycle of names)

            9 Ik

            10 Akbal

              . . .

There are 260 elements in this sequence. That is because 260 is the least common multiple of 13 and 20. Thus the cycle of (13) tzolkin day numbers combined with (20) tzolkin day names repeats each 260 days.

In order to explain this 260-day calendrical cycle some have speculated that the Mayas chose this number of days because their allegedly advanced astronomical knowledge revealed to them that a period of 260 days fits well with certain astronomical periods, such as the eclipse-year. A more prosaic explanation is that there were originally two branches of Maya society, one of which used a 13-day cycle of numbered days and the other a 20-day cycle of named days. (There is a set of thirteen Maya gods, which may be the origin of the 13 numbered days, similar to our week.) Then at some point in early Maya history the two groups merged, combining the two calendars so that neither group would lose their method of day-reckoning, resulting in the 260-day cycle as described above.

Mayan Civil Calendar – Haab dates

The Mayas also maintained a so-called "civil" calendar, called the "haab". This was similar to our calendar in that it consisted of months, and within months, of days numbered consecutively. However, unlike our calendar, the haab cycle is made up of eighteen months of twenty days each, plus five days at the end of the year. The eighteen names for the months (in the order: Pop, Uo, Zip …) are:

    Pop    Xul     Zac   Pax

    Uo     Yaxkin  Ceh   Kayab

    Zip    Mol     Mac   Cumku

    Zodz   Chen    Kankin

    Zec    Yax     Muan

The five extra days formed the "month" of Uayeb, meaning "nameless". The five "nameless" days were considered unlucky. One did not get married in Uayeb. The haab cycle thus consisted of 18*20 + 5 = 365 days, the integral number of days closest to the mean solar year of 365.2422 mean solar days.

The sequence of days from the first day of the year to the last thus runs as follows:

    0   Pop

    1   Pop

    ...

    19  Pop

    0   Zip

    1   Zip

    ...

    19  Zip

    0   Zodz

    ...

    19  Cumku

    0   Uayeb

    ...

    4   Uayeb

For most of Maya history the first day of Pop was denoted by 0 Pop and the last by 19 Pop. However, on the eve of the Spanish conquest the first day of Pop began to be numbered 1, and the last day 20 (except for Uayeb), so that the year began with 1 Pop and ended with 5 Uayeb.

There is some uncertainty as to whether (what has usually been taken to be) the first day of each haab month (e.g., 0 Zip) is really the last (i.e., the 20th, or the 5th) day of the preceding month (Pop in this case), or in other words, whether the last day of each month was actually written as "the day before the beginning of (the next) month", where the glyph translated as "the seating of" was used with the meaning of "the day before the beginning of the next month, namely …". 0 Zip can be interpreted either as the first day of Zip or as the last day of Pop, but unfortunately the classic Maya are no longer here to tell us how they understood this date.

The Maya calendar round

The tzolkin and the haab are each cycles of days; the former is a cycle of 260 days and the latter is a cycle of 365 days. When specifying a day the Maya usually used both the tzolkin date and the haab date, as in 4 Ahau 3 Kankin. For the Mayas these two cycles ran together and concurrently, as shown by the following sequence of days:

Tzolkin date

10 Ben

11 Ix 
12 Men

13 Cib      
1 Caban  
2 Edznab

3 Cauac

4 Ahau

5 Imix   
6 Ik 
7 Akbal     
8 Kan      
… 
12 Imix        
13 Ik           
1 Akbal         
2 Kan    
3 Chicchan 
4 Cimi    
5 Manik         
6 Lamat     
7 Muluc        

Haab date

11 Kayab

12 Kayab

13 Kayab

14 Kayab

15 Kayab

16 Kayab

17 Kayab

18 Kayab

19 Kayab

0 Cumku

1 Cumku

2 Cumku

19 Cumku

0 Uayeb

1 Uayeb

2 Uayeb

3 Uayeb

4 Uayeb

0 Pop 
1 Pop

2 Pop


Since 260 = 4*5*13 and 365 = 5*73, the earliest that a tzolkin/haab date combination can repeat is after 4*5*13*73 = 18,980 days, or just short of 52 solar years. This cycle of 18,980 days is called the Maya calendar round.

Maya long count dates are often given in association with the corresponding tzolkin/haab date, as in:

            8.11.7.13.5     3  Chicchan 8 Kankin

        10.1.19.15.17    12  Caban     0 Yax

           10.3.8.14.4      6  Kan       0 Pop

             10.6.2.0.9      9  Muluc      7 Yax

        10.6.10.12.16      3  Cib        9 Uo

A particular tzolkin/haab date recurs every 18,980 days, whereas a long count date (assuming that the long count starts over at 0.0.0.0.0 on reaching 13.0.0.0.0) recurs every 1,872,000 days (once in 5,125.37 years). The combination of a long count date and a tzolkin/haab date occurs only once every 136,656,000 days (approximately 374,152 years or 73 Maya eras).

The Mayan Calendar conversion applet below gives the following dates:

Start of the Mayan calendar (long count cycle):  0.0.0.0.0  [ 4 Ahau 8 Cumku ] is Aug 10, 3113 BC

End of the Mayan calendar (long count cycle):  13.0.0.0.0 [ 4 Ahau 3 Kankin ] is  Dec 21, 2012 AD
DATE CONVERSION APPLET

If you have a Java-enabled browser, you will see an interactive calendar converter routine below. Fill in the Gregorian Date in the top fields (day, month number, year) and press `Convert’ to find the Maya calendar date corresponding to that. Please note that the order is day, month, year.

Note: This Java applet uses the 584,283 correlation. If you prefer the 584,285 correlation, you have to subtract 2 days from the date you want to convert. For instance: Jan 1, 1996 would become Dec 30, 1995.

Check out these  Mayan Calendar Conversion Tools


OTHER CALENDAR SYSTEMS

Julian dates

The Julian calendar, introduced by Julius Caesar in 46 B.C., is the basis of our modern calendar. It consists of a system of twelve months, January, February, etc. (although New Year’s Day has not always been January 1st). If the number of the year is divisible by 4 then February has 29 days, otherwise it has 28. A date in the Julian calendar is termed a Julian date.

The Romans identified their years as a number of years supposed to have elapsed since the founding of Rome (which we now date as having occurred in 753 B.C.) Following the merger (under Constantine) of the Christian Church and the Roman Imperium years came to be numbered with reference to the year of the birth of Christ (now regarded as actually having occurred in 4 B.C.) In this system the year immediately before the year 1 A.D. is the year 1 B.C.

Astronomers use a system, which is also used in Mayan Calendrics, in which the year prior to the year 1 is the year 0. Thus 1 B.C. is the year 0, 2 B.C. is the year -1, 3 B.C. is the year -2, and so on. More generally the year n B.C. in common usage is said by astronomers to be the year -(n-1). (See more on this in section 7.)

According to Aveni [5], p.127, "the serial numbering of the years as we know them did not actually begin until the sixth century …" Thus dates prior to 600 are always uncertain. The Emperor Augustus also tinkered with the lengths of the months during his reign, introducing a further element of uncertainty, and it is also possible that the Council of Nicea (325 A.D.) readjusted the calendar by a couple of days.

Gregorian dates

The average length of a year in the Julian calendar is 365.25 days, differing from the value of the mean solar year by about .0078 days. This resulted in a slow shift of the Julian calendrical year with respect to the solar year (i.e. to the solstices and equinoxes). By the 16th Century the Julian calendar was seriously out of synch with the seasons and Pope Gregory XIII introduced the Gregorian Calendar. This involved three changes:

(a) The day following October 4, 1582, was declared to be October 15, 1582, thereby excising ten days from the calendar.

(b) A year was declared to be a leap year if (i) it was divisible by 4 but not by 100 or (ii) it was divisible by 400.

(c) New rules for determining the date of Easter were introduced.

The Gregorian Calendar is now commonly used throughout the West and is the de facto international common calendar. There have been numerous suggestions for replacing it with a more "rational" calendar, but old habits die hard and any change would be expensive.

Julian day numbers

Astronomers use a system of dating days known as the Julian day number system, in which a day is identified as that day which is a certain number of days before or after the day -4712-01-01 (January 1st, 4713 B.C.) in the Julian calendar. Thus, for example, the day whose Julian day number is 584,283 is September 6, -3113 in the Julian calendar, 584,283 days after January 1st, -4712 J. This day is also August 11th, -3113 in the Gregorian calendar. By 2001-01-01 G we will have reached the day whose Julian day number is 2,451,991, by which time nearly two-and-a-half million days will have elapsed since -4712-01-01 J.

CALENDAR SPIRALS

Sequences and cycles are readily described as spirals in the Dreamspell and sacred geometries. The numbers of the Pythagorean Lambdoma are 1, 1, 1, 1 an 1, 2, 3, 4. This is an obvious sequencing that can be understood in cycles. The Fibonacci spiral is fundamental to all life forms. The Fibonacci is a simple matrix that starts with 1 then adds 1 to get a sum of 2 the adds the previous number back into itself to get a sum of 3 (I +2=3) then repeats that sequence to get a sum of 5 (3+2=5). Primary numbers of the Fibonacci on the number 1 carried to 13 places are: 1, 1, 2, 3, 5 8, 13, 21, 34, 55, 89, 144, 233.

Solar systems are designed by nature in Fibonacci spirals as are human hands, sunflowers, and shells. This sequencing is a fundamental design tool of Creation. Spectacular patterns are found by applying the Fibonacci spiral to key numbers of the Mayan calendar: 20, 13 and 18. The sacred calendar (Tzolkin) uses 20 and 13 The civil calendar (Haab) uses 20 and 18. The common denominator of both is 20. If you apply the Fibonacci sequence to the number 20 and carry the sequence out to 26 places, then multiply each number of the sequence by 13, then divided it by 18 you will discover that the results of these factors shifts and starts new internal sequencing at the 13th place in each sequence. The 12th place comples a sequence and the 13th starts a new sequence internally.

The 12th glyph of the Dreamspell is ‘Human’ and the 13th glyph is "Skywalker". The sacred calendar is 260 days and the civil calendar is 360 days with 5 unlucky days that are not counted. The Maya were well aware that a solar system is 365 days but chose to memorialize the number 360. Their simultaneous use of two calendars with astrology arrayed sets of ratios and sequences yet accounted for each day of the year in a way utterly foreign to the European calendar. The number 360 symbolizes space in a 360-degree circle or sphere. When a 360-day civil calendar symbolizing space is arrayed with a 260-day sacred calendar symbolizing fourth dimensional time, time-space ratios (coordinates) are discovered. The civil and sacred calendars synchronize every 52 years, so 52 is a central fractal of the calendars.

The number 20 used in a Fibonacci matrix and factored with 13 and 18 produces internal sequences and cycles in the 12th and 13th places. With 12 solar months to 13 lunar months, the 12:13 relationship is part of nature’s planetary design.

END DATES

There have been many projected dates for the ending of the Mayan calendar, ranging from 1957 to 2050. The 2012 end-date was defined by the Thompson Projection. Thompson’s projection used a day-by-day count to cross -reference the Mayan to the European calendar rather than a count of years. This bypassed the problem of year names in the Gregorian system. Jose & Lloydine agreed with Thompson’s 2012 date. More importantly, the 2012 date works with the hard facts evidenced by the accuracy of the July 26, 1992 Time Shift. Terence McKenna and Peter Meyer’s Timewave Zero software that graphs time as a fractal demonstrates by graph the accuracy of the winter solstice of 2012 as the correct end-date of the Mayan calendar with graph anomalies appearing in the months of July.

SIMILARITY OF WORLD CALENDARS

Beyond the stargates of this planet and solar system lies a cosmic scheme of underlying order in which the earth’s flow of history unfolds in patterns of time. Galactic travelers have long traversed the corridors of time and space, and 
periodically visited this solar system. The evidence of archaeological ruins are mute testimony to the presence of intelligent builders in now ancient history. The evidence is clear. Someone with advanced knowledge of astronomy has visited peoples of this planet and left calendars as a signature note. This is discovered in correspondences of world calendars: Mayan, Tibetan, African, Vedic, and Hebraic. Similar calendar schemes are found in each of these cultures.

The European calendar mandated by Pope Gregory in 1583 is the only world calendar that did not intercalate at least two celestial cycles. The Hebraic calendar acquired by Enoch after he was translated in a beam of light intercalated solar and lunar cycles in a fashion similar to the Maya. The Dogon in Africa were given four calendars by visitors from Sirius B: Solar, lunar, Venusian, and civil. The Tibetan calendar is so similar to the Mayan that traditional scholars now speculate that they share a common origin. The Vedic calendar is based on cosmic cycles, or Yugas. An ancient Hindu astrology used 27 houses of 13 degrees 20 minutes, which are key numbers in the Mayan calendar.

These calendars provided a time management tool that synchronized planetary cycles with visits from the stars. The Dogon calendar identified the 12 or 13th Century as the date of last visit; the Mayan calendar identified July 11, 1991, as an upcoming date of visit. Both of these dates coincided with significant planetary cycles.

The cultures visited by the Galactic Maya were shamanic. Ancient Hebraic instructions for building altars and using precious and semiprecious stones are identical to those used by Native Americans. The ancient Tibetans were shamanic. The Dogon and Maya are shamanic. The Galactic Maya were shamanic.

Ancient Hebraic instructions for building altars and using precious and semiprecious stones are identical to those used by Native Americans. The ancient Tibetans were shamanic. The Galactic Maya were shamans of planetary sciences, Cosmic Shamans who understood and utilized the cosmic flow of events. Their secrets were left with shaman in cultures who held the keys of their sciences. Until now the shaman’s craft has appeared as superstition that scattered before the power of European-based science. But that same science has now brought planet to her knees in destruction of the biosphere.

Answering Mysteries of the Origin of Matter
by Anthony Paul Perella</CLASS=Q>


M E T A P A R T I C L E S
ANSWERING MYSTERIES OF THE ORIGIN OF MATTER

by Anthony Paul Perella

All contents Copyright © 2003 Anthony Paul Perella


How Physical Particles Came Into Existence from a Dynamic, Original Source of Energy

The Metaparticle Theory began with a deciphering of certain brief statements about
the composition of matter, taken from the literature of an ancient era when there was no “physics” to contrast with “metaphysics”.
Over a period of years we attempted to apply these clues, by trial and error, and later by computer simulations. Working specifically with the electron, new models of basic subatomic particles were produced.
They could easily be tested and and shown to be congruent with examples of actual particle behavior recorded by experimental physics. More surprisingly, our models immediately solved behavioral mysteries that had persisted for decades.

Thus metaparticle structure, though derived from a source beyond the strictly physical,  is shown to apply empirically to the science of Particle Physics.

TABLE OF CONTENTS:

THE METAPARTICLE THEORY WAS FIRST FORMULATED IN THE LATE SEVENTIES AND MADE PUBLIC IN 1983 BY ITS AUTHOR ANTHONY PAUL PERELLA. IT IS GIVEN IN COMPLETE FORM ON ITS HOME SITE: WWW.METAPARTICLES.COM
E-MAIL: mail@metaparticles.com
COMPUTER CHARTS AND DIAGRAMS BY CHARLES BUEKER, SATELLITE DESIGN ENGINEER. THIS PRESENTATION IN DIGEST FORM INCLUDES UPDATES TO JAN. 1ST, 2003, WITH LINKS GIVEN TO HOME WEBSITE.
(With subsequent additions).

STATEMENT OF NON-AFFILIATION:
The author herewith states that he is not affiliated with any organization, philosophical, religious, scientific, commercial, fraternal, or educational.
All contents Copyright © 2003 Anthony Paul Perella


INTRODUCTION

The author wishes to say at the beginning that he possesses no scientific credentials, and claims no namable source of metaphysical inspiration or illumination.

It was never thought initially that a simple new model of the electron, based on two points of energy rather than the conventional single point, would eventually be seen to have implications of such a widely inclusive nature. You are invited to reach your own conclusions as to the significance of such implications.

Our attitude has been that when sound, repeatable evidence exists favoring certain alterations in basic scientific concepts, an account of the findings should be made public and offered freely to those interested. And when the discovery holds promise of explaining how all elementary particles are produced, the data should be put before those capable of carrying new outlooks forward in the science of particle physics. It seems reasonable that such professionals, including mathematicians, cosmologists and astrophysicists, might eventually give it attention, even though we cannot put such data in mathematical form. And we continue to think the potentials of metaparticle origin and structure will be found interesting and hopeful to others also, including nonprofessionals like ourselves.

A very reasonable question that is asked about the theory goes like this:
If you start with an imaginary premise, tailored to fit certain “clues” of uncertain origin, how can you reach the point of confidence that your electron model is not fictitious? The answer: Because both its forms, two- and three-dimensional, fit known facts of electron behavior. And further, our models fit those facts better than the one-point model science made do with for decades — despite creating many “enigmas” over which only quantum mechanics could build satisfactory bridges.

If an imaginary model works, it should no longer be thought fictitious. Especially not if supports the reality of the logical premise underlying it — in this case a physically imperceptible “field” of dynamic energy whose laws dictated the eventual model. The process might be described as reciprocal evidence between causes and results.

Let me end by stating that the Metaparticle Theory is based on a substantive aspectof that primordial field of energy, and not on the conscient aspect also associated with metaphysics. Consequently the theory does not depend on either mysticism or religion. Nothing about it in any way diminishes, disparages, or encroaches upon them, nor need it ever do so. We strongly hope and believe the concepts of metaparticle structure will only enhance both science and religion, each in it its own sphere of serving the needs of humanity.


ELEMENTS OF THE PREMISE

Sources of Data, Scientific and Metaphysical

Unsolved scientific mysteries, particularly those relating to particle physics, provided the main impetus for the Metaparticle Theory from its beginning in ontological curiosity to the current state. It can now be presented as an organized series of inter-dependent arguments claiming, at its widest extent, that all matter originates in a substratum of undifferentiated energy underlying the universe — non-objective, indefinable, but everlasting and ultimately real. We will be referring to this as the Dynamic Field.

Subatomic particles are taken in this theory to be the original and irreducible state of matter having organized structure. Consequently, it must be strongly evidenced here that fundamental particles such as the electron possess a structure that can most logically be seen as deriving from the imponderable but omnipresent substratum, rather than from “nothingness”, or the spatial vacuum, as thought earlier by physics.This is our Premise.

Our evidence consists of showing, by means of computer simulations and comprehensible diagrams instead of by advanced mathematics, that many “mysteries of particle behavior”, never solved through insufficient concepts based on wave/particle duality, are immediately solved by the two models of particle structure evolved and illustrated in this presentation.

What Science labels as “mystical” or “metaphysical” is automatically deprived of relevance in a system built upon empirical results.
However, metaparticle experiments do yield empirical results and are repeatable. This suggests, does it not, that although the substratum may not be “knowable” in the accepted sense of the word, it creates the knowable.
Therefore we predict that as long as it may take, the “Field” of absolute energy which sustains existence will some day be found as necessary to physics as it is to metaphysics.

Philosophical and Metaphysical Data

Since the Dynamic Field or substratum is visible only in the forms of physical particles produced from it, and further since one of the two poles of every such particle is totally imperceptible except through its effects on the other pole, whoever wishes to call this a metaphysical theory is certainly justified in so doing.
But what we actually have here is a body of physical evidence, supported by philosophical and metaphysical assertions coming from worldwide sources over several epochs. Largely by trial and error graphic models developed, and were gradually revealed to embody the true structure of the electron type of subatomic particles. So I think it justified to say the theory combines metaphysics as cause and physics as effects.*

Just a few years ago popularized scientific books were filled with discoveries increasing the number and types of particles, plus highly interesting and imaginative wave theories — the stranger the better, according to physicist Niels Bohr.
Elementary particles were thought to consist of a single point-particle (or corpuscle) plus its “wave nature”. Today it seems that behind the scenes as it were, the emphasis has shifted to more realistic particle structure, and relatively little is being publicized about probability waves, wave function collapse, et cetera.

There is nothing to be served by mentioning here all the books and other sources from which data about physical particles were obtained. But it will become evident throughout this presentation that we have made very little use of mathematics. Charles Bueker is well educated in fields of math useful to a mechanical engineer whose specialties lie in the area of satellite design. But I myself am responsible for the theorizing and I am, to put it gently, “mathematically disadvantaged”.

Explanations of principles said to characterize the universal substratum are mostly metaphysical. They are essential to understanding metaparticles and must be given. But such explanations, even though I have labored to make them as clear as possible without overexplaining to readers, are difficult to condense. Consequently we give them in full in the section labeled DATA NOTES, hoping you will be interested enough in what the theory accomplishes to investigate them.

* I summarize the major structural principles within the term Divergent Balance.

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

The section following puts in seven consecutive steps the creation of an electron from the primordial dynamic energy of the substratum or Dynamic Field underlying space.

The sequential reasoning in the Seven Steps* is essential to the entire metaparticle enterprise. We are fortunate that no one has yet succeeded with arguments to invalidate the logic of their progression.

These steps comply with what I can only call abbreviated hints concerning the constitution of matter. Such metaphysical fragments of what could once have been wider teachings may go back millennia. Dates are uncertain, but it is beyond question that they antecede the historical beginnings of thought about atoms.

More detailed graphics depict the basic and augmented metaparticle models in the section following upon the Seven Steps. These include charts resulting from computer simulations.

Here now is the most concise synopsis of the metaparticle Premise that I can devise:

SYNOPSIS OF THE THEORY’S PREMISE

Creation of matter in the form of fundamental particles
demands as source a non-material substratum or Dynamic
Field in a non-dimensional, permanently enduring space. This “abstract space” underlies and sustains the universal space which contains all that exists. Such Field consists of
homogeneous motion whose dynamic energy remains in a single state of intensity. Laws intrinsic to the Field cause different but balanced points of energy to be instantaneously translated into objectivity. Thus unity of being becomes variety of existence.

AXIOMATIC PRINCIPLES IN PREMISE INCLUDE:
  • The energy of motion in a Dynamic Field is primary and eternal
  • The “substantive” energy of that Field is homogeneous
  • Changes in the Field can occur only in dynamic intensity
  • In the creation of a primordial particle (metaparticle), energy taken from one point in the Field is added to a second point to create two poles in divergent balance

SEVEN STEPS IN THE PRODUCTION OF MATERIAL PARTICLES
FROM A NON-MATERIAL FIELD

The substantive source of the creative process is an endless Field of  homogeneous  motion-energy, called here Dynamic Field. Natural Laws and forces should, by the principle of primordial non-duality, be coalescent with the Field. See Data Notes for explanations regarding homogeneity, dynamic intensity, and Existence vs Being.
Separative vs unitive forces (divergent balance) is a hitherto unknown principle detailed in Discussions section of www.metaparticles.com (an external link).

1.

IN THE FIELD OF UNIFORM DYNAMIC ENERGY, A CHANGE OF INTENSITY IS CAUSED AT TWO POINTS.  SEPARATIVE FORCE HOLDS THEM APART, BALANCED BY THE OMNIPRESENT UNITIVE FORCE SEEKING TO RESTORE FIELD HOMOGENEITY.

Point a will become the visible “lesser”
pole and point
b the invisible “greater”
pole of  a fundamental particle.

In considering these steps, please bear in mind the difficulty in applying “existence words” to a state of non-relative Being. (Example: the idea of “two points” in a field characterized as having “no dimensions” and occupying an “abstract” space.)

2.

LAWS OF EQUILIBRIUM AND CONSERVATION DEMAND THAT THE CHANGING INTENSITIES TWO POINTS CAUSES ONE POINT TO HAVE  MORE ENERGY, AND THE OTHER LESS ENERGY THAN THE BACKGROUND VALUE OF THE FIELD.  THE SAME LAWS DECREE THAT ANY INTENSITY OF ENERGY ADDED TO ONE POINT BE SUBTRACTED FROM THE SECOND.

The key factor in intensity as the only changeable element of the Field is explained in Data Notes under subhead of “The Primacy of Motion.”

Sequential steps are also misleading since they imply linear time.
The first three steps are simultaneous; time enters only when the linked point-poles enter our spacetime.

3.

SINCE DIFFERENCES CANNOT REMAIN IN THE HOMOGENEOUS FIELD, BOTH “POINT-POLES” ARE TRANSLOCATED INTO THE SPATIAL UNIVERSE WHERE OBJECTS CAN EXIST. THEIR CONTINUING LINKAGE ALONG A LINE OF OPPOSING FORCES BECOMES A ONE-DIMENSIONAL OBJECT, WHICH IMMEDIATELY BEGINS ROTATING TO BECOME TWO-DIMENSIONAL.

The two poles of a forming metaparticle do not become farther apart when translocating into universal space (as the diagram suggests).
They have “diverged” only in intensities.
(See Discussions section
of www.metaparticles.com
(an external link) for details of Divergent Balance.)

4.

THE DIVERGENCE OF POLAR ENERGIES TO INTENSITIES BELOW AND ABOVE THAT OF THE FIELD BACKGROUND IS THE CAUSE OF A CONTINUUM OF ENERGY RANGES THROUGHOUT THE COSMOS.  THIS FACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PARTICLE’S POLE OF GREATER ENERGY TO BE INVISIBLE TO CONSCIOUSNESS FOCUSED AT OUR PHYSICAL LEVEL.

The Metaparticle Theory relates to primordial principles acting in logically restricted ways to produce particle forms that can exist in a universe of relationships among objects and forces.
To the extent that structure determines function, the theory is concerned also with the latter.
But only Experimental Physicists are equipped to deal with inter-particle functions. (Example: the electron’s negative charge.)

5.

THE OPPOSITE FORCES OPERATE AS A DIAMETER LINKING THE GREATER AND LESSER POLES. THE SEPARATIVE FORCE BECOMES RECOGNIZABLE AS ANGULAR MOMENTUM. THE COHESIVE FORCE, BEING INTERNAL, CANNOT BE  ELECTROMAGNETIC.  IT EXPRESSES THE PRIMORDIAL “UNITIVE” PRINCIPLE WHICH MAY BE AKIN TO THE EXTERNAL FORCE OF GRAVITY.

Such details as the greater pole’s invisibility, the “unitive” force compared to gravity, etc., are offered as hypotheses only.

The invisibility of the greater point-pole of the metaparticle known as the electron is a fact, however, though explanations for the fact may differ.

The essential principle of divergent balance is responsible for the greater pole’s existence in a physically imperceptible range of energy.

6.

ROTATION OF THE POLES AROUND AN AXIS PERPENDICULAR TO THE DIAMETER CREATES THE DYNAMIC FORM OF A DISK. THE STRUCTURE NOW POSSESSES TWO DIMENSIONS.

We contend that very fact is what led physics away from the truth of particle structure from the time the electron was discovered.

[7. ]*

THE GYROSCOPIC PRINCIPLE OF PRECESSION ALLOWS THE DISK FORM TO TAKE ON SECONDARY ROTATION AROUND AN AXIS PERPENDICULAR TO ITS DIAMETER.  THIS ALLOWS A METAPARTICLE TO ASSUME THREE-DIMENSIONAL SPHERICAL FORM (FIG. 3)

In accordance with these 7 steps, the electron is indicated to be an example of a structural prototype originating in metaphysical reality.

Note: Experiments have revealed satisfactory results when the velocities of primary to secondary axial rotations are in a ratio of one to one-half, or 2 to 1.

* In the second edition of Metaparticles now on Web at www.metaparticles.com , Step 7 has been incorporated into Step 6.


THE METAPARTICLE STRUCTURE IN ITS TWO FORMS

Note that a metaparticle is not a new type of particle, but a binary, bipolar structural principle discovered in physical particles.

The electron, typical of particles having the archetypal structure shown here, normally travels through space in the Basic form of a dynamic disk as shown below (Fig.1 and Fig.2).

Fig 1

As metaparticle moves along arrowline, objective point will trace out the “wave-form” of a helix.

The Basic form shows vector orientation along its primary “spin axis.” This can be “up” or “down.” (Rotation can be clockwise or counter-clockwise.)


Fig. 2a Graphic symbol for metaparticle

But that orientation disappears when the particle goes into double rotation in its spherical form* below  (Fig.3). In the past, science’s structureless model of particles has required such explanations as “it is oriented in no direction,” or “in every direction.” The metaparticle’s alternating forms solve such paradoxes.

In the past, science’s structureless model of particles has required such explanations as “it is oriented in no direction”, or “in every direction”. The metaparticle’s alternating forms solve such paradoxes.

Dashline oval in Fig.3 shows another perimeter of sphere*, added for visual clarity.

*Computer chartings actually indicate a spheroid.

THREE-DIMENSIONAL ALTERNATE FORM OF ELECTRON

The movement of the objective pole of an electron (or similar particle) when it is involved in rotation on two axes is shown in Fig. 4. Arrows guide you through a very interesting and revealing pattern, in which the point-pole keeps to the surface of the spheroid form produced. Although rotation in particles is mentioned in recent publications for laymen, I’ve seen nothing about this form, which has been integral to the Metaparticle Theory since the early 80’s.

Fig 5

Fig. 4

The spherical form of an electron develops simply from its rotating disk, which in turn comes from a diameter linking polar points of energy. The two point-poles are bound together by a primordial principle Science might one day wish to consider — divergent balance.

The computer rendition in Fig. 5 traces the pathway of an electron’s objective point by enumeration. Having no hint of such structure, experimentalists have long had to abide with ever more ingenious wave theories that began to challenge the very conception of reality.

(Right here can be seen the primary cause of the “cloud of waves” concept and other wave theories which seem to be no longer in currency.)

But where intuition failed, the reliable predictions of Quantum Mechanics continued to provide what the work of science needed. Gradually, many scientists seemed to downplay understanding in favor of general utility. In recent instances, writers in the theoretical field are suggesting the idea that Quantum Mechanics might well be theactual controller of all universal laws and forces. (So I thought I had better start capitalizing it).

Fig 6

Fig.5
In the computer chart above, No.1 at center is on closer,
front surface of dynamic sphere; No. 33 is on back surface.

A TAOIST YANG & YIN SYMBOL

Comparison might suggest some connection. Did ancient sages somehow have knowledge of the basics of matter? Or is it just coincidence?

Fig 7

Fig. 6


ENDING  THE  MYSTERY OF  WAVE / PARTICLE  DUALITY

There is very little doubt that certain foundational changes are being investigated, tested, and accepted among leading lights in Particle Physics. During the final years of the 20th century, veiled references began appearing in science articles and especially on the Internet, with a sort of controlled, scientific excitement glowing behind the veil. Momentous revelations are coming. “Soon”. “Before long”. Nobody says when.
It may be that nobody yet knows exactly when.

It’s as though the Knights of the Round (or Discoid) Table cannot ride forth until they decide how to decorate their new horses. But all the inferences and official silences add up: Much indeed has to be revised, including the grand mystery of Wave/Particle Duality.

For decades Physics thought fundamental particles were composed of a single point possessing mass, charge, spin, etc. But certain experiments showed particles also act like waves. Eventually came the compromise: An electron, for example, was thought of as being sometimes a corpuscle and at other times as a sort of indefinite “cloud of waves”— “probability waves” that “collapse” into a point particle when you attempt measurement.

That gives us a fair synopsis of the wave/particle duality concept, leaving intact its traditional ability to be incomprehensible to all but the specially gifted. But when the powers finally concluded that particles like the electron have to possess an internal structure allowing rotation in place of a single spinning point, the need for a second point was unavoidable. (Physicists had always known a non-dimensional point can’t spin, having no radius or axis, but quantum mechanics had let them get by without confronting that problem. Two points avoid it by allowing a diameter between them.)

In Fig.7 that second point is shown as a white circle following the broken-line pathway. In the metaparticle it is diametrically opposite the known, physical point which carries the negative charge in an electron. They both rotate around an axis indicated by the arrow-line, which also represents the electron’s direction of translation or travel. Note that each of the point-pathways describes a helix, so the entire particle translates through space as a double-helical “wave form”.

Fig. 7 as shown does not impress one as looking like a wave. It does look more like the conventional idea of a wave when it is stretched out as in Fig.7a . But to get right to the cogent question that leads to solving the mystery of wave/particle duality, let’s eliminate everything but the pathway of the black dot in Fig.7b. That represents the “wave track” made by the detectable point-pole of the electron (or lesser pole of the metaparticle-electron).

The questions: After the black dot passes any given position reached along that black wave-line, the latter remains on the paper; but does it remain in space? Does that wave-line persist in actual existence — as the dot does? If you say maybe it persists in the time aspect of spacetime, let me ask once more: Even if in some sense it exists in the past and is projected in the future, should the wave be granted a real existence equal to that of the particle?

In my unprofessional opinion the answer has to be No.
The “wave” is simply the pathway described by the point. One can’t say it has
no reality, or you would have to say a bullet’s trajectory or the orbit of the Earth around the sun is unreal. But though the point makes the wave, the wave does not make the point, so their “duality” does not give them equal reality.

I do not subscribe to the idea that All Realities Are Created Equal, whether any historical celebrity ever said it or not. And in this particular case I would bet that Scientific Materialism does not fully believe it either.

All the above does not mean Science is going to declare that Wave/Particle Duality was a mistake. The concept’s wording was never the mystery, nor was its rationale at the time it was proposed. The mystery was always that the concept could never be actually understood. (And I will even modify that by adding, Couldn’t be understood by anyone who didn’t make an A in Cosmiquantum Mechanics.)

Let me now make this clearer than I already have: Particle Physics would have arrived at its changes and would be almost ready to announce its new Standard Model if the originator of the Metaparticle Theory had drowned in a rainstorm a year before he started work on it. Such has never been in question.

The now and future question is this: How will scientists explain the way they are getting the “invisible” second point?

Particle Physics is not, of course, quite yet ready to entertain the “greater pole”, “more intensity”, “Dynamic Field” explanation provided by metaparticles. But — again in my opinion — things would turn out a lot easier and better in the long run if they could.

The point is real in energy and duration; the wave has a subsidiary reality as the space-time track, past and future, of the point. But since the point-particle is always in rotation, creating the wave, both co-exist simultaneously and are both significant.


STRANGE BEHAVIOURS

THE 2-D AND 3-D METAPARTICLE FORMS RESOLVE BOTH SIMPLE AND COMPLEX MYSTERIES

The most momentous example of a major particle mystery solved by metaparticle structure in basic, 2-D form was given in the Wave/Particle Duality section. Others could be mentioned in instances where the electron (representing a class of particles) is in orbit around a nucleus. But I have decided it might contribute more to our credit account in your mind if we outline a major, perennial, complex mystery that has tested the imagination of many a well-known particle physicist: the electron beam diffraction experiment. You’ll see why this one is easier to visualize than it is to diagram for a computer screen.

Imagine a tube, representing an electron gun, projecting a beam of individual electrons. They must go through a tiny hole in a barrier to register as small dots of light on a phosphor screen. The electrons hitting the screen straight-on build up a bullseye in its center. But the rest of them make concentric rings around the bullseye, exactly like a target.

What could be causing this rather startling phenomenon? That is what so many theoretical physicists were straining their imaginations over for generations. They came up with one marvel after another, many seemingly preposterous but impossible to prove either right or wrong. As far back as 1985 books show that physics was applying the hypothesis of side-wise momentum to this problem (implying particles), yet at the same time declaring it was a wave interference phenomenon. No one seemed to know what might be causing the sidewise momentum.

We are of course convinced that the helical pathway of the basic metaparticle-electron will explain sidewise momentum and provide the final answer to this challenging puzzle. We have neither the equipment nor the mathematics to attempt a computer simulation ourselves. It would take an experimental lab. But here is what I wager — figuratively speaking.

I’ll bet Particle Physics already has the answer by now (1/03), and it is keyed to anew binary or two-point structure of fundamental particles. Repulsion between the negatively charged electrons in atoms of the barrier hole edge and the “lesser pole” of the incoming electron is responsible for the target pattern. Electrons in the gun’s beam are deflected at various angles to strike the phosphor screen, building up the concentric rings.

Remember, there is no way we could know where Science stands, at the present moment, on the electron diffraction mystery. Yet I am so sure this problem can be satisfactorily solved only by the basic metaparticle structure that I am willing to gamble my (figurative) reputation on it!

OUR LEADING DISSOLVER OF MYSTERIES IS THE SPHERICAL FORM

Puzzling observations regarding the orientation or “spin vector” of particles began cropping up before the middle of the last century. Even then there was uncertainty about whether particles were spinning or rotating, and some theorists implied both, but without explaining how or why, as far as I could tell. But it seemed generally accepted (by science writers, at least) that an electron could be imagined as “spinning” around an axis, either clockwise or counter. Which way determined its spin vector.

The upshot that concerns us here is that when Experimenter A measured the orientation of a particle, he reported it had definite spin vector, up or down. Meanwhile Experimenter B has been measuring another electron with identical equipment and conditions, and she reports hers shows no orientation in any direction. Or perhaps, she adds, it is oriented “in every direction”.

Even for an alert browser reading this sort of thing, the word mystery tends to come to mind. Stephen Hawking seemingly confirmed the mystery in A Brief History of Time (1988), when he wrote that quantum mechanics contradicts the picture of particles as tiny tops spinning around an axis by indicating that spinning particles display no distinct axis.

The two metaparticle forms account for a distinct answer, however. One sees immediately in the basic model (Fig. 8) that rotation around an axis by two points (one of them invisible) accounts for up or down spin vector. But to explain Experimenter B’s strange case of either no-which-way or every-which-way, the basic model has to take on secondary rotation or gyroscopic precession, becoming a dynamic sphere.

Evidently an electron can be held static in either basic or augmented form by an electromagnetically generated field in a laboratory. Let’s not neglect to remember,
as I sometimes do, that particles are extremely small objects. Scientific techniques keep improving, so I should only say I think they still can’t tell whether the particle they constrain for experiment is being held static in an oriented or disoriented condition. Not until they probe it by some means such as x-rays, photons, etc. But when Experimenter B can’t find any vector in her captive electron, we contend the doubly-rotating, spherical, metaparticle model is responsible. The rapid rollover of the metaparticle disk to make the spherical form is indicated in Figs. 8 and 9. For diagram purposes it shows the particle as though moving left to right; but in the grip of the magnetic field the particle will “rollover” in place.

Fig. 8                             Fig. 9

Precession* causes the basic disk to begin rotating on secondary axis 2 – 2a, while its two poles continue their revolution around the arrow axis. This results in a constantly changing spin vector and explains why Experimenter B’s electron has become “disoriented”.

* Brookhaven National Laboratory announced in 2001 that precession had been observed in the spin of a muon (heavier electron)’. They intimated such discovery might challenge the Standard Model of particle physics. I have as yet encountered nothing else relating to a particle’s ability to assume spherical form, which has been a major aspect of metaparticle structure since the late seventies.

NOT UNTIL DECEMBER, 2002, DID THE SPHERICAL METAPARTICLE SOLVE THE “ELECTRON ROLLOVER” MYSTERY

Stephen Hawking remarks the fact (in A Brief History of Time) that particles of spin-½, such as the electron, do not look the same if you turn or roll them over through one complete revolution; you must put them through another 360°. We thought we had this puzzle solved ten years ago. We wondered why nobody applauded. Well, I had it wrong.

But now we have it right. (Let celebrations begin)

This is a tough one in the solvable-sans-math category. Let me put it simply enough to make an intellectual flinch:

  • You are holding an electron static in a magnetic field generated by a “device”. (We don’t know what they use now.)
  • Your electron shows an “up” vector. (So we know it’s a basic metaparticle with two poles rotating on an axis (Fig. 8) and starting to roll over (Fig. 9).)
  • With your device you cause the electron to “roll over in place”.
    (You can’t watch it do this, of course.) You stop the process after one complete rollover, do your measuring, and find the electron is now upside down. You are puzzled; it should be right-side-up again.
  • Undaunted, you repeat the rollover another 360°. Amazing; the electron now shows the proper up-vector again. You report this and change your field of research.

The answer to this mystery lies in the ratio between the first rotation (poles spin to create a dynamic disk around the primary axis) and the secondary rotation, known in this case as gyroscopic precession. The disk itself revolves at a slower rate of velocity to make a dynamic sphere. The ratio between the first and second rotations is 1 to ½ or 2 to 1. At that particular ratio the electron rolls over and comes around right-side-up at 360 degrees.

Something has disturbed the normal course of events. We contend it does not take large-brain mathematics to decide the culprit is the device generating the magnetic field. But without knowledge of the electron’s alternate spherical form, math would probably give just a working solution but not an understanding of the cause. (I will refrain from discussing why this took me ten years to get right.)

All along the secret was this: The electron changes from basic to spherical form when forced to roll around in a clock-like circle. All would be well except for the theoretical fact that the magnetic field device slows down the velocity of the secondary rotation, so it is no longer in the ratio of 1-to-2 with the inter-polar primary rotation. The ratio changes to 1-to-4.

While finding this out I also discovered first-hand a benefit of mathematics: It saves an awful lot of words and drawing pictures. Four of us worked on this, doing trial-and-error. I never saw so much paper with disks and poles and arrows rolling around. Here is an example of what I believe is all one can actually study without danger of developing inter-polar vertigo:

Fig. 10

Basic metaparticle electron with “up” orientation
Magnetising device imposes rollover, causing change to spherical form
At ratio 4-to-1, when point-pole has circled once the disk has made 1/4th a rollover
Device now shows 360° rotation, but electron shows “down” vector

Following the black (visible) pole you can see it makes two complete revolutions around the inter-polar axis. That is 720°. But primary rotation of the poles is not what determines the up-or-down orientation of the particle. The turning over of the disk does that. The slowly tilting arrows show the disk has turned only 90° — and is upside down — even though the experimenter’s device shows 360°.

Now the likelihood is very great that this mystery is solved by the influence of the rollover device on the metaparticle’s secondary rate of rotation. But we are not claiming a complete solution yet on a technicality: We can’t get a particle physicist of the experimental mode to tell us what we need to know about that magnetic field “device”. Does it not have to turn over itself in order to turn over the electron?

Maybe we will never know. “Metaphysicists” are not popular with Physicists. And that’s a problem (not a mystery) we can’t solve.

– – – – –

PS – The Fig. 10 sequence only takes you half-way. Should you desire a fuller exposition, and are willing to risk inter- polar vertigo, click on the “Double Rotation” topic at our home website: www.metaparticles.com .


CONCLUSIONS

They say every Parisian could recognize Napoleon’s horse. Its exercise groom would often water it at a certain trough on the Boulevard Saint-Germain. A street artist whose setup was on a nearby bridge did an ink sketch of the horse at the trough one day. He hung the sketch from his umbrella on the bridge and sold dozens just like it. Eventually “the Emperor’s horse” became a sort of local landmark.

A few years later the famous artist Delacroix was passing along the Boulevard Saint-Germain and saw Napoleon’s horse drinking at the trough. From quick sketches done on several such occasions he eventually did a large oil painting which was displayed in the Louvre.

Now the question: Even though strolling foreigners sometimes remarked that the street artist’s sketch must be a cheap copy from the Delacroix in the Louvre, is it strange that nobody ever suggested Delacroix might have copied from the street artist?*

*(No; it is not strange; the very idea is preposterous.)

Is it a mystery that art-wise Parisians never referred to this instance of similarity as being a coincidence? After all, they would say, “it is the same horse.”

The analogy is imaginary but applies, as I think you may agree, to instances of similarity evident in the two lists of structural foundations below. One concerns metaparticles and the other is a best-guess list of particle features that I think are likely to show up in the new Standard Model of Particle Physics. I am predicting that two or three features will be very similar between the two listings, though others will probably not be. Of course, if there are no similarities at all, there goes the metaparticle’s chance of earning a footnote in the history of science.
(But I will no doubt keep on saying Just wait — it will someday turn out to be the same horse.)

FOUNDATION  PRINCIPLES OF METAPARTICLES
BEST-GUESS LIST OF PARTICLE FEATURES IN NEW STANDARD MODEL

1 – The basic reality of a Dynamic Field underlying all existence.
1 – If an ultimate origin of particles will now be theorized, it may call upon concepts such as the “quantum vacuum” as energy source, but surely not the Dynamic Field of substantive metaphysics.

2 – A principle now called divergent balance, first described in 1983. It keeps the poles of a particle both together and apart, dividing their energies in a metaphysically balanced way that assures stability.
2 – Known or previously theorized forces will be postulated to maintain particle structure, but certainly not the metaphysical principle of divergent balance.

3 – The resulting bipolar structure of particles in the electron category, and probably also particles similar to those in certain ways. The presence of diameter in metaparticles permits internal rotation to replace the former concept of a spinning point.
3 – At least two points or nodes of energy will be found indispensable for internal rotation, perhaps a binary or bipolar structure, perhaps another physical possibility; but in the electron one node will have to be the negatively charged point.

4 – The necessity for one pole of a metaparticle (which I call the second or “greater” pole) to be physically imperceptible, except by inferred influences.
4 – A second node of energy in stable association with the visible or perceptible node will have to be physically imperceptible – otherwise it would have been discovered a century ago.

5 – The ability of a basic, two-dimensional metaparticle to assume spherical or spheroid form; it does this by taking on precessional rotation on a second axis. (Precession is a known gyroscopic phenomenon discovered to apply at the particle level quite recently, but incorporated in structural metaparticle models in 1983.) .

5 – Alternate 3-dimensional form employing the physical principle of gyroscopic precession.

Having finally gotten all that into visibility, I will now take the leap and commit the Metaparticle Theory to the prediction that Numbers 3 and 4 (definitely) plus No. 5 (very probably) are the particle features in both lists that will prove to be essentially the same or quite similar. I will also volunteer to admit that in these three cases, Metaparticles has a predictive advantage by having been first to start down this road.

You will naturally think it curious that a small squad of piccolo players should have any kind of advantage over the All Universities Marching Band, but here is why we do:

  • No. 3:
    A new Physics model can hardly stick with the old single-point electron, which over the years was responsible for dozens of quandaries and incredible wave theories. Such were entertained mainly due to the powers of quantum mechanics to bestow plausibility. If internal rotation is to become doctrine, the rotating particle has got to have at least two poles. (Or “nodes of energy” – always with that hedge.)
  • No. 4:
    If one pole of a particle were not “invisible”, Physics would never have been saddled with the single-point model. Whatever their term for it, Science seems to be stuck with an invisible, hard to reckon with, basic element in many of their particle models. (But it could eventually open many cosmic doors!)
  • No. 5:
    The 3-D alternate form. If in 2001 the Brookhaven Laboratory hadn’t announced their discovery of precession in muon behavior, Physics might have gone ahead with their new Standard Model without it. If they delay their announcement much longer, the spherical form might be one of the reasons. The Science of Particle Physics can’t get by with a bunch of diagrams the way we try to, you know. Just think of all the functional details that have to be nailed down in connection with this concept alone. Just think of the math! (But don’t expect me to.)
What is important and what just “has significance”?

When Physics adopts new particle models you can depend on it that those models will do the work Particle Physics demands. Importance is awarded either by great numbers of people or by smaller numbers of very influential people. In this case both can be counted on.

From such a viewpoint the Metaparticle Theory will probably be seen as important only to the extent it is congruous with the prevailing new models. But if Metaparticles can continue on the sidelines as an alternate approach to understanding certain aspects of universal existence, then its basic principles will retain significance. In this case that means promise for the future of science; promise for the expansion of understanding.

Metaparticle solutions to mysteries is a small thing compared to the significance of its originative principles. In the field of scientific inquiry and in the future tense, these could hardly be more significant. One naturally wishes to know exactly why. My answer has to be this: Because the metaparticle origin of nature’s fundamental building blocks offers, for the first time since Particle Physics became a science, a provable linkage between empirical physics and substantive metaphysics.

Which sounds very impressive. But it will mean little until science begins to use that linkage. And in my opinion science will not pick up something unless it is wearing its own gloves.

A dozen years ago, scientific interest in the mystery of quintessence or dark matter had scarcely begun. Today considerable progress has been made relating to the problem of “the expanding universe”. But we out here in our relative ignorance have been getting overstuffed with the negatives and underfed with positives. There has been a spate of featured articles in news and science magazines on this subject. Ever enamored of the sensational, writers have chosen the most negative possibilities, treating them as though they were certainties. They have displayed a sort of depressing enthusiasm in depicting a distant future in which no whisper of life remains, no stars, no light, only the scattered dust of galaxies in unending darkness.

But there are now specialists in cosmology, astrophysics, and astronomy who are interested deeply in a brighter picture. They are looking for and turning up promising leads toward finding more matter, new sources of energy and gravitation to offset galaxies speeding away from each other as though seeking solitude.

This is where Substantive Metaphysics comes in – if science ever opens a door. I’ve mentioned it before but just let me now state its distinction from Conscient Metaphysics as a bi-partition:

SUBSTANTIVE ASPECT:
Concerned only with the permanent substratum of dynamic “substance” underlying objective existence and sustaining all ranges of its matter and energy.

CONSCIENT ASPECT:
A correlated and equally basic realm within (and in a sense beyond) the universal substratum, comprising consciousness and the conscious entities of religions and various worldviews.

In a minimum of words, it is the substantive aspect of metaphysics which holds future promise as an expanded and entirely proper domain for scientific progress.

Hypotheses and theories concerning “quantum vacuum energy” in space, new implications of the zero concept, and the granting of a sort of “lesser reality” to virtual particles — these and other important lines of inquiry are now underway. They tend to imply a future in which perhaps the greatest cosmic mysteries will be put in retreat. Such a future will, I dare to predict, have need of an expanded conceptual framework by which science can more effectively deal with higher ranges of matter/energy.

The metaparticle view of matter and its origin is founded in the progressive cycles made possible by a permanent, undiminishing source, the Dynamic Field. It is, in its full extrapolations, a very optimistic view. The galaxies will return! Life will continue! (If you don’t agree, would you please not say so until I have left the room?)

– – – – –

Every man who continues to call himself a philosopher, regardless of what others may choose to call him, should allow himself at least one high-sounding aphorism.

To conclude these Conclusions, here is mine:

Particles are the interface between
absolute and relative reality.

In what we term matter,
particles join together essence and existence.

– – – – – – –

Pending additions here, information on the divergent balance principle may be found in Discussions I, www.metaparticles.com . Our e-mail address ismail@metaparticles.com .


DATA NOTES: Philosophical & Metaphysical

The Premise of a theory employing deductive reasoning is taken as being axiomatic as the source of postulates derived from it. In this case the Premise can be stated only as a composite of related metaphysical concepts, which depend on their physical applications for worldly credibility.

Sources of Data

In Western metaphysics can be found a wealth of studies devoted to the nature of being, and seeking definition of an underlying, basic substance. Ontological inquiry began with ancient Greeks such as Heraclitus and Pythagoras and was continued in later centuries by philosophers including Spinoza, Hegel, Descartes, and Leibnitz.
On the question of what is real, a divergence has always remained between materialism and idealism: Does reality abide in matter or spirit?

In the absence of modern scientific concepts I was unable to come upon anything in classical inquiries I could relate directly to the creation of particles*. But as you will see, the Metaparticle Theory does provide new evidence that reality includes both matter and spirit. To be more precise, it deals with matter as a fundamental reality, created from the substratum’s substantive aspect by natural laws, and differing from its conscient aspect, for ages called spirit, only in quality of energy and consciousness.

In a short but incisive book comparing Western with Eastern religions, the Christian humanitarian Albert Schweitzer concluded that while West surpassed East in the teaching and practice of ethics, East surpassed West in the extent and depth of its metaphysics. This influenced me to enter the multi-currented seas of Eastern mysticism, yoga, Zen, and doctrinal writings. The voyage was far from wasted, but as for gaining a useful insight into cosmogenesis I learned most about “nothingness”.

Both Vedantic and Zen literature led me at length to understand why nothingness or “voidness”, as in satori and samadhi, a seemingly infinite field of emptiness is beheld, but comes to be known as complete fullness. Later I discovered the explanation for this lies in the concept of field homogeneity.

Another of the major clues sustaining my efforts stemmed from the Brahmanic termmulaprakriti, meaning root-matter. This source proclaimed, without elaboration, that materiality is composed of two ingredients held firmly in an enduring relationship, without which neither could remain in existence; and that these two, termed “spirit and matter”, are actually two poles of the same eternal substance.

In the historical literature of Western mysticism I found a very interesting and reassuring account. The medieval German ecclesiastic Meister Eckhart recorded in detail from his inner experiences the same phenomenon I had noticed in Eastern sources: “voidness”. A relatively few explorers of consciousness in the West have referred to this experience as “the zero state”, “Space consciousness”, etc., but Eckhart termed it “the Godhead”. He emphatically distinguished this sense of a shining emptiness from the “awareness of God”, though his consciousness spontaneously alternated between the two states. According to him, “God has all the glory”, while “the Godhead seems as empty as though it were not.”

Such East-West coincidences, as the dubious would surely call them, were further reinforced in the writings of my own mentor, Franklin Merrell-Wolff**, now departed. His term for that state of consciousness (which unlike Eckhart he preferred over the highest ecstasy and bliss) was “the High Indifference.” It took me, incidentally, quite a long time to recognize an important hidden meaning in the latter word.

It was also in a book published in the West that I came upon another brief but cogent clue which I could not have done without. It appears in the first volume of The Secret Doctrine by H. P. Blavatsky. It says in essence that the three main characteristics of “the Absolute” are abstract space, duration, and motion.

________________________________________________________

*See important addendum dated Feb.’03 at end of Data Notes.

** Author of Pathways Through to Space and The Philosophy of Consciousness Without an Object

Being and Existence

No doubt semanticists can distinguish between being and existence, though Webster’s Unabridged Dictionary does not. Yet the difference becomes indirectly apparent when the Latin origin existere is given as meaning “stand forth.” The distinction is indispensable to this exposition, because its entire process depends upon the fact thatexistence is not the same as Being. (I capitalize the word to get away from worldly usages.) Being, in its cosmic sense, remains hidden. Existence “stands out” to be objectively knowable.

Point and Field Aspects of Being

A dimensionless point, a “field” of such points, and space itself could be shown to be the same, I believe-if there were motive enough for the argument. What is essential tothis theory, however, is the concept of a Dynamic Field, “composed of identical points,” “filled with the same intensity of energy,” and “occupying abstract space.”

I should call your attention to the fact that all the words within quotation marks above are inappropriate to the very idea I am trying to get across; namely, a field of pure Being which underlies our universe of existing things. Our words are perforce “existence words”; we don’t have many “Being words” (though the Sanskrit language did).

There can hardly be a more abstract subject than the Dynamic Field, also known by other names such as Parabrahm, the Godhead, the High Indifference, the Absolute. We shrink from the abstract, the non-material, because we are immersed in materiality and a large part of the human race believe that is where all of reality resides. But there have still been many who have penetrated in consciousness to a sort of cosmic reflection of the Dynamic Field, and those who could say anything at all about it have said it was maximally real. So let’s adopt both viewpoints for a moment and see if the word homogeneous can do double duty here. We know what it means: all of it the same; uniform throughout. That’s the existence meaning. But it’s also the Being meaning.

The Dynamic Field should not be thought of as encompassing all the aspects of metaphysical reality. It is beyond the objective universe, but as will be indicated by the physical results of this theory, the Dynamic Field provides the basic materials and energies of the universe. Consequently, in metaphysical thought of both East and West, it holds a cardinal position which corresponds to omnipresence in trinitary systems. Where it is said to be characterized by duration, motion, and “abstract space”, I found the latter term to be completely beyond my understanding until I realized it was another way of saying space minus the concept of dimensions.

The Primacy of Motion

Having said all I think might be faintly helpful towards understanding the Dynamic Field concept, in general, I will go on now to what “occupies” the Field, or perhaps better “constitutes” the Field: the essence of motion. But let me say at this point that I do not know that everything I am writing about the “substratum” of the universe (or maybe “overstratum”) is perfectly true and accurate. I seriously doubt that it could be, since I don’t think anybody who is constrained within the limits of what we call normal human consciousness could actually know whether or not the Premise of this Metaparticle Theory accurately represents primordial facts. So I present all this asprobably true-as far as I know-but with the expectation that what emerges (after the seven steps of particle creation) will underscore that probability.

About three hundred years ago the French philosopher and mathematician Rene’ Descartes declared that motion is the essence and cause of existence. Though several others have espoused the same general idea, it has not to my knowledge significantly influenced modern science. Among physicists an unreadiness to embrace motion as prime cause would seem to follow naturally from the fact that nobody (and I really mean nobody) can define just what is moving!

Nonetheless, motion, and the laws and forces causing changes in motion, are the key factors in producing matter from the non-material Dynamic Field. Let me present a brief synthesis of thoughts from a Western scientist and an Eastern philosopher, expressed in the nineteenth century, on the primacy of motion:

(W) All we can cause or can observe is variety
of motion…Motion is not generated from
nothing; it can be transferred and transformed,
but cannot be destroyed.

– Sir Oliver Lodge

(E) Motion is all-pervading and absolute rest is
inconceivable…Motion is eternal because
spirit is eternal…Spirit, life, and matter
are not natural principles existing
independently of each other, but the effects
of combinations produced by eternal
motion in space.

– Koot Hoomi Lal Singh

My friend the British philosopher Ernest Wood wrote, in one of his many theosophical books, his definition of a perfect motion. He said a perfect motion would move in every direction, simultaneously and at infinite velocity, returning to its point of origin in no time. The result would seem to be identical to the “dynamic stillness” spoken of by the German-Tibetan lama Anagarika Govinda. Perhaps the two taken together can give us some impression of the absolute motion of the Dynamic Field.

It may be pertinent, in view of recent (2001) news coverage of experiments at temperatures nearing absolute zero, to recall that although molecules can be stilled, atomic and particle motions continue.

Given the non-dimensional nature of the Field, we can see that the modes of motion we are familiar with would be impossible there. No velocity, no expansion or contraction, no changing of position, no vibration. Yet energy has to be intimately associated with the homogeneous motion of the Field. And also imperative is the ability of innate laws and their forces to cause changes in the Field-without which nothing would ever happen!

Now I would say it’s close to impossible (for me, at any rate) to imagine a motion that doesn’t move in any way or direction. Furthermore, increase or decrease in motion is wedded in our minds to velocity – which is likewise ruled out. What is left? Well, the energy “intimately associated with motion.”

We can imagine a change in energy that does not involve spatial dimensions. The single example that qualifies, I believe, is intensity. As we shall see, that concept will work. If there can be a change in the Field’s eternal background motion at a point or at countless points, such change can only be one of intensity. Although quantity of energy may seem to be only an “existence concept,” it is certainly legitimate to associate energy quantity with its intensity without bringing in ideas of volume in spatial terms. Consequently we can deal with “more energy” and “less energy”-always in relation to the Field’s background (which remains forever indeterminable). We can confidently refer to the metaphysical energy-of-motion as dynamic intensity. And we know balance is essential.

Laws and Forces in the Field

The Laws of Conservation and Equilibrium are both metaphysical and natural laws. They clearly apply in this theory. There is an even more basic metaphysical law for which I have never encountered a recognizable name. This hypothetically supreme law stems from the fact of ultimate non-dual Unity. It operates as a cohesive “unifying force” that underlies but is not the same as electromagnetism. As it applies to the seven-step, being-to-existence transition, this is the force which would cause paired points of different intensities to reunite if a separating force were withdrawn. In light of recent views expressed in particle physics literature, one could speculate that the physical force of gravity may be an extenuated, weakened effect of this unifying force, and also that the strong nuclear force may closely correspond to it.

Proceeding by Necessity

Before the listing that follows, may I ask you to bear one thing in mind. Through the years of this theory’s development, my goal was to put together logical reasons showing that a viable physical particle could be produced out of a non-material, non-relative, permanent Field in only one way. I expected that way would be simpler, more reasonable, and would explain more than any other.

No matter how hard they might be to grasp with our earth-trained faculties, I felt the essential Dynamic Field concepts had to be presented – intelligibly if possible – before asking readers to apply judgement to the Seven Steps. I hope that has been done. But I still want to convince those willing to think about it further that each factor in the process is there by necessity – meaning it couldn’t work any other way. I will attempt that here:

  1. Once it has been caused to arise, no slightest difference can remain in the homogeneous Field. (Otherwise no “sameness throughout”.)
  2. Such a difference has to occur in the slightest item, which is a “point of presence”. (What could be more basic than such a point?)
  3. In a Field without dimensionality, a point cannot become different by changing its position or size, but only by a change in the intensity of its energy – which means more intensity or less intensity than the value of the Field background. (What other change is possible?)
  4. A point having an intensity different from that of the Field must leave the Field together with another point in balance with it* — if an electron or similar elementary particle is to be created.**
  5. Therefore the future electron’s two points of difference, even though metaphysically balanced, must enter existence in company with a force keeping them together and another force to keep them apart – as outlined in the seven Steps.

I hope I have been able to show in the above that the major developmental factors followed in the creation of particles, from a reality thought a few years ago to be “nothing”,*** have been dictated by logical necessity.

_____________________________________________________________

* Divergent balance is a principle lying at the very root of the Metaparticle Theory. In my justification of it in Discussions, it will become evident why, for the sake of quicker grasp of the basic creative divergence, I have begun with two points in the Field rather than with the concept of one point which becomes polarized to become two.

** The accepted rule that electrons and other particles always have twins of opposite electric charge, such as electrons and positrons, is not to be confused with the pairs of balanced, dynamic points composing each particle itself.

*** I can still hear Carl Sagan talking on his TV series about the Big Bang. He favored the idea that hydrogen atoms were compressed together to make the cosmos-creating explosion. “And where did the hydrogen atoms come from?” he would ask. And then, spreading his hands, “They must have come out of nothing!” (Incidentally, the present theory holds that primordial space, plus the particles created to become compressed into a singularity, preceded the initial Big Bang.)

______________ Addendum, February ’03 _______________

With Metaparticles as of now well introduced, I find I must add a paragraph here.
It deserved a prominent place on the first page of Data Notes, but in my earlier researches I simply never encountered any reference to it.
Attributed to Anaximander, a Greek philosopher of the 6th century B.C., the concept is very pertinent to metaparticle principles. Anaximander, a student of Thales, described a basic, primordial “element” that differed from “all the heavens and worlds” created from “its infinite nature”. He said this apeiron was an “eternal and ageless substance” encompassing all worlds, to which its “infinite motion” gave birth.

This compares so closely to the Dynamic Field premise of the Metaparticle Theory that I feel somehow guilty for not knowing about it years ago. But I guess one can’t read everything, especially without an Internet.


Discussion:
DIVERGENT BALANCE
A Creative Principle for Particles and Worlds

When the binary structure of particles is shown to correct the insufficiencies of wave/particle concepts from the recent past, long-lived mysteries begin to disappear. Super-efficient math based on quantum and probability theory answered problems and allowed correct predictions before a more accurate understanding of particle structure had arrived. Quantum mechanics provided results, but in many cases no understanding of cause.

Particle Physics and Cosmology are near the point of revealing new theories and perhaps new principles. These steps will allow conceptual understanding to overtake pragmatic efficiency and promote progress. Metaparticles has sought to make its contributions from beyond the city walls of science. There may be facets of each which reflect each other.

Read More…

Copyright © 2003 Anthony Paul Perella


This is the first electron diffraction
pattern obtained in the atomic cluster
research laboratory. The sample is
a thin film of polycrystalline gold
and each diffraction ring is due
to scattering from a specific plane
of atoms.

Image Credits


Pure thallous chloride on a Vinylec (Polyvinyl Formal) substrate mounted on a 200 mesh copper grid. Produces sharp lines for accurate determination of lattice spacings (“d” values) for use as an electron diffraction calibration standard.
Image Credits

Electron diffraction pattern
A typical electron diffraction pattern for a crystalline specimen is shown here.
Image Credits


Transmission electron diffraction is highly sensitive to surface structures which consist of only a few layers of atoms. Shown here are the intensities from the Ge(111)4×4-Ag surface reconstruction recorded on a film negative with an exposure time of just 16 seconds.
Image Credits

Nikola Tesla

 

"There manifests itself in the fully developed being, Man, a desire mysterious, inscrutable and irresistible: to imitate nature, to create, to work himself the wonders he perceives. Long ago he recognized that all perceptible matter comes from a primary substance, or tenuity beyond conception, filling all space, the Akasa or luminiferous ether, which is acted upon by the life giving Prana or creative force, calling into existence, in never ending cycles all things and phenomena. The primary substance, thrown into infintesimal whirls of prodigious velocity, becomes gross matter; the force subsiding, the motion ceases and matter disappears, reverting to the primary substance."   – Man’s Greatest Achievement, 1907

"So astounding are the facts in this connection, that it would seem as though the Creator, himself had electrically designed this planet." – Tesla describing what is now known as Schumann Resonance (7.8Hz) in The Transmission of Electrical Energy Without Wires As A Means Of Furthering World Peace 1905.

"Of all the frictional resistances, the one that most retards human movement is ignorance, what Buddha called ‘the greatest evil in the world.’ The friction which results from ignorance can be reduced only by the spread of knowledge and the unification of the heterogeneous elements of humanity. No effort could be better spent."

"Science is but a perversion of itself unless it has as its ultimate goal the betterment of humanity.

— Nikola Tesla


Tesla was awarded 221 worldwide patents, and 113 US patents. These covered polyphase AC power alternators, transformers, and motors, radio communication, fluorescent lighting, automotive ignition systems, VTOL aircraft, efficient bladeless turbines, etc. Tesla was relatively unconcerned about getting rich, seeking funds only to continue his research for the betterment of humanity. After 1915, Tesla slowly faded into obscurity, finally dying penniless in 1943. Later that year, the US Supreme Court declared Tesla the TRUE inventor of radio.

The famous physicist, Niels Bohr summed it up nicely:

"Tesla’s ingenious invention of the polyphase system as well as his explorations of the amazing phenomenon of high frequency oscillations were the basis for developing completely new conditions for industry and radio communications, and had a profound influence upon the whole civilization."

Philadelphia Experiment  |  Wireless ElectricitySchumann Resonance |
Tesla’s Death Ray

Nikola Tesla

Nikola Tesla (July 9/July 10, 1856 – January 7, 1943) was a physicist, inventor, and electrical engineer of unusual intellectual brilliance and practical achievement. He was of Serb descent and worked mostly in the United States.

Tesla is most famous for conceiving the rotating magnetic field principle (1882) and then using it to invent the induction motor together with the accompanying alternating current long-distance electrical transmission system (1888). His patents and theoretical work still form the basis for modern alternating current electric power systems.

He also developed numerous other electrical and mechanical devices including the fundamental principles and machinery of wireless technology, including the high frequency alternator, the "AND" logic gate and the Tesla coil, as well as other devices such as the bladeless turbine, the spark plug and numerous other inventions.

Early years

Tesla was born around midnight between July 9th and July 10th, 1856 in the village of Smiljan near Gospic, in the Lika region of the Military Frontier (Krajina) of the Habsburg Monarchy, now in Croatia. His father, the Rev. Milutin Tesla, was a priest in the Serb Orthodox Metropolitanate of Karlovci. His mother, uka Mandi, made home craft tools. Tesla was one of five children, having one brother and three sisters.Tesla went to school in Karlovac (then Austria-Hungary, now Croatia), then studied electrical engineering at the Austria Politechnic in Graz, Austria (1875). While there, he studied the uses of alternating current.

In 1881 he moved to Budapest to work for the telegraph company, American Telephone Company. On the opening of the telephone exchange in Budapest, 1881, Tesla became the chief electrician to the company, later engineer to the Yugoslav government and the country’s first telephone system. He also developed a telephone repeater (or amplifier).

For a while he stayed in Maribor. He was employed at his first job as an assistant engineer. Tesla suffered a nervous breakdown during this time. In 1882 he moved to Paris to work as an engineer for the Continental Edison Company on designing improvements to electric equipment. In the same year, Tesla conceived the induction motor and began developing various devices that use rotating magnetic fields (for which he received patents in 1888). Tesla hastened from Paris to his mother’s side as she lay dying, arriving hours before her death in 1882. After her death, Tesla fell ill. He spent two to three weeks recuperating at home near Gospic.

Middle years

In 1884, leaving the warfare of his birthplace behind, Tesla moved to the United States of America to accept a job with the Edison Company in New York City. He arrived in the US with 4 cents to his name, a book of poetry, and a letter of recommendation from Charles Batchelor, his manager in his previous job.

Early employment

When Tesla first arrived in the United States, he was offered a job by Thomas Edison when the latter saw his letter of recommendation from Charles Batchelor which read simply "I know two great men and you are one of them. This young man is the other".

Tesla’s work for Edison began with simple electrical engineering. Eventually Tesla earned the respect of Edison and offered to undertake a complete re-design of the Edison company’s DC dynamos. After Tesla described the nature of the benefits from his proposed modifications, Edison offered him $50,000 if they were successfully completed. Tesla worked nearly a year to redesign them and gave the Edison company several enormously profitable new patents in the process. When Tesla inquired about the $50,000, Edison replied to him, "Tesla, you don’t understand our American humor" and reneged on his agreement, offering a raise in Tesla’s salary of $10 per week as a compromise – at which rate it would have taken almost 100 years to earn the money Edison had originally promised. Tesla resigned on the spot. In some accounts of the final confrontation, he didn’t say a single word to Edison but simply turned his back on the inventor and walked off the premises.

In 1886, Tesla formed his own company, Tesla Electric Light & Manufacturing. The initial financial investors disagreed with Tesla on his plan for an alternating current motor and eventually relieved him of his duties at the company.

Tesla worked in New York as a common laborer from 1886 to 1887 to feed himself and raise capital for his next project. In 1887, he constructed the initial brushless alternate-current induction motor, which he demonstrated to the American Institute of Electrical Engineers (now IEEE) in 1888. In the same year, he developed the principles of his Tesla coil and began working with George Westinghouse at Westinghouse’s Pittsburgh labs. Westinghouse listened to his ideas for polyphase systems which would allow transmission of AC electricity over large distances.

Tesla’s generation of electricity resulted in what is known as alternating current, or AC. In alternating current the polarity and strength of the energy is continuously changing or alternating. Prior to Tesla’s innovation, the Edison company was promoting direct current, or DC, as a safer way to power both homes and factories. In fact, Edison, despite knowing that Tesla’s AC was superior, mounted an ugly publicity stunts designed to discredit Tesla and to save Edison’s own financial investment in DC.

Animals were brutally electrocuted with AC, including an elephant, which were recorded by Edison and shown at public gatherings.

Edison embarked on a number of propaganda campaigns which attempted to persuade the general public that AC was dangerous. Nicknamed the "death current" by Edison, public demonstrations were staged in which animals were brutally electrocuted with AC, including an elephant, which were recorded by Edison and shown at public gatherings.

Despite the public’s fear of AC, Tesla had the upper hand. Direct current was good only for short distances. The accumulated resistance in metallic wires and cables greatly reduced the electrical power as it traveled through the transmission lines. AC, on the other hand, did not suffer the same loss and was able to travel great distances with little loss of potential.

Also, because alternating current could react with coils of wire (transformers) to increase or decrease the voltage, electricity could be produced at high power levels at the generation stations and then reduced just prior to being distributed locally. Eventually, Edison lost his battle and alternating current became the electric industry standard. To this day, the three-phase form of Tesla’s polyphase system is still used for the generation and transmission of most electricity. Moreover, the conversion of electricity into mechanical power is made possible by updated versions of Tesla’s three-phase and split phase motors.

X-rays and friendships

In April 1887, Tesla began investigating what would later be called X-rays using his own single node vacua tubes (similar to his US514170 patent). This device differed from other early X-ray tubes in that they had no target electrode. The modern term for the phenomena produced from this device is termed the bremsstrahlung process. He also used Crookes tubes. A modern day x ray tech would not use this type of technology.

On July 30, 1891, he became a naturalized citizen of the United States and established his Houston Street laboratory in New York. He lit vacuum tubes wirelessly in it, providing evidence for the potential of wireless power transmission. Around this time, Tesla developed a close and lasting friendship with Mark Twain. They spent a lot of time together in Tesla’s lab and elsewhere. Tesla’s closest friends were artists. He also befriended Century Magazine editor Robert Underwood Johnson, who adapted several Serbian poems of Jovan Jovanovi Zmaj (which Tesla translated).

When he was 36 years old, the first patents concerning the polyphase power system were granted. He continued research of the system and rotating magnetic field principles. By 1892, Tesla became aware of what Wilhelm Rontgen later identified as effects of X-rays. He performed several experiments (including photographing the bones of his hand; later, he sent these images to Rontgen) but didn’t make his findings widely known; much of his research was lost in the 1895 Houston Street lab fire.

Tesla commented on the hazards of working with single node x-ray producing devices, attributing the skin-damage to ozone rather than the radiation: "As to the hurtful actions on the skin… I note that they have been misinterpreted… They are not due to the Roentgen rays, but merely to the ozone generated in contact with the skin. Nitrous acid may also be responsible, but to a small extent." (Tesla, in Electrical Review, 30 November 1895). This is incorrect concerning cathodic x-ray tubes. Tesla later observed an assistant severely "burnt" by x-rays in his lab.

Wireless and the AIEE

Tesla served as the Vice-President of the American Institute of Electrical Engineers (now part of the IEEE) from 1892 to 1894. From 1893 to 1895, he investigated high frequency alternating currents. He generated AC of one million volts using a conical Tesla coil and investigated the skin effect in conductors, designed tuned circuits, invented a machine for inducing sleep, cordless gas discharge lamps, and transmitted electromagnetic energy without wires, effectively building the first radio transmitter.


Tesla sitting under the fury of his Tesla Coil

In St. Louis, Missouri, Tesla made a demonstration related to radio communication (he demonstrated radio energy crossing space (one side of a stage to the other)) in 1893. Addressing the Franklin Institute in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania and the National Electric Light Association, he described and demonstrated in detail its principles. Heinrich Hertz had made such demonstrations, repeatedly, five years previously. Hertz’ demonstrations were not public (they were conducted during his physics lectures) but strictly speaking neither were Tesla’s (the Franklin Institute didn’t open to the general public until 1934).

Tesla held over forty U.S. patents (circa 1888) covering our entire system of Polyphase Alternating Current (AC). These patents are so novel that nobody could ever challenge them in the courts.

Tesla’s four-tuned circuits (two on the receiving side and two on the transmitting side, secured by U.S. patents #645,576 and #649,621) were the basis of the U.S. Supreme Court decision (Case #369 decided June 21, 1943) to overturn Marconi’s basic patent on the invention of radio.

  • Alternating-current power transmission
  • The Death Ray Machine
  • Fluorescent lights
  • Induction motor
  • Polyphase alternating-current system
  • Radio
  • Rotating magnetic field principle
  • Telephone repeater
  • Tesla coil transformer
  • Wireless communication
  • World’s Fair Exposition

At the 1893 World’s Fair, the World Columbian Exposition in Chicago, Illinois, an international exposition was held which for the first time devoted a building to electrical exhibits. It was a historic event as Tesla and George Westinghouse introduced visitors to AC power by using it to illuminate the Exposition. In protest, Edison would not allow use of any of his lightbulbs for this event.

As if lighting the Exposition was not enough, Tesla explained the principles of the rotating magnetic field and induction motor by demonstrating how to make an egg (made of copper) stand on end in his version of the Egg of Columbus.

War of currents

In the "War of Currents" era in the late 1880s, Nikola Tesla and Thomas Edison became adversaries due to Edison’s promotion of direct current (DC) for electric power distribution over the more efficient alternating current (AC) advocated by Tesla.

1896-1899

When Tesla was 41 years old, he filed the first basic radio patent (No. US645576). A year later, he demonstrated a remote controlled boat to the US military, believing that the military would want things such as radio-guided torpedoes. In 1898 a radio controlled boat was also demonstrated to the public during an electrical exhibition at Madison Square Garden. These devices had an innovative coherer and a series of logic gates. Radio remote control remained a novelty until the Space Age. In the same year, Tesla devised an electric igniter for gasoline engines which was nearly identical to ideas about the same process used by modern internal combustion engines.

In 1896, according to an interview he gave in 1916, Tesla invented a type of loudspeaker. The sounds were of the quality of the telephones of that time. The invention was never patented nor released publicly (till years later by Tesla himself).

As a result of the "War of Currents" Edison and Westinghouse were almost bankrupt, so in 1897 Tesla released Westinghouse from contract providing Westinghouse a break from Tesla’s AC motor royalties.

Colorado Springs

Moving in

In 1899, Tesla decided to move and began research in Colorado Springs, Colorado, where he could have room for his high-voltage high-frequency experiments. He chose this location primarily because of the frequent thunderstorms, the high altitude (where the air, being at a lower pressure, had a lower dielectric breakdown strength, making it easier to ionize), and the dryness of the air (minimizing leakage of electric charge through insulators). Also, the property was free and electric power available from the El Paso Power Company. Today, magnetic intensity charts also show that the ground around his lab possesses a denser magnetic field than the surrounding area. Tesla reached Colorado Springs on May 17, 1899. Upon his arrival he told reporters that he was conducting experiments transmitting signals from Pikes Peak to Paris.

Tesla kept a diary of his experiments in the Colorado Springs lab where he spent nearly nine months. It consists of 500 pages of handwritten notes and nearly 200 drawings, recorded chronologically between June 1, 1899 and January 7, 1900, as the work occurred, containing explanations of his experiments. He was developing a system for wireless telegraphy, telephony and the transmission of power, experimented with high-voltage electricity and the possibility of wireless transmitting and distributing large amounts of electrical energy over long distances. He also conceived a system for geophysical exploration–seismology–which he called telegeodynamics, based on his reciprocating mechanical oscillator patented in 1894, and explained that a long sequence of small explosions could be used to find ore and create earthquakes large enough to destroy the Earth. He did not experiment with this as he felt there would not be "a desirable outcome".

Much of what Tesla discovered while in this lab has been lost to history and Tesla’s own secrecy. To this very day there is talk of Tesla’s Death Ray being invented there as well as communication with other planets. How much of this is true is now unknown, but has made Tesla’s time at this remote lab a wellspring for Urban legends about him.

Laboratory construction

Tesla, a local contractor, and several assistants commenced the construction of the laboratory shortly after arriving in Colorado Springs. The lab was established on Knob Hill, east of the Colorado School for the Deaf and Blind and one mile (1.6 km) east of downtown. Its primary purposes were experiments with high frequency electricity and other phenomena, and secondary–research into wireless transmission of electrical power.

Tesla’s design of the lab was a building fifty feet by sixty feet (15 by 18 m) with eighty-foot (24 m) ceilings. A one-hundred-forty-two foot (43 m) conducting aerial with a thirty-inch (760 mm) copper-foil-covered wooden ball was erected on the roof. The roof was rolled back to prevent fire from sparks and other dangerous effects of the experiments. The laboratory had sensitive instruments and equipment.

Magnifying transmitter

Missing imageTesla_colorado_444px.jpgDouble exposure publicity photo of Tesla sitting in his laboratory in Colorado Springs with his "magnifying transmitter" generating millions of volts of electricity. The arcs are about 22 feet (7 m) long.

The lab possessed the largest Tesla Coil ever built, fifty-two feet (16 m) in diameter, known as the Magnifying Transmitter (further MT). Not identical to a classic Tesla Coil, it was a three-coil magnifying system requiring different forms of analysis than lumped-constant coupled resonant coils presently described to most. It resonated at a natural quarter wavelength frequency and could work in a continuous-wave mode and in a partially damped-wave resonant mode.

According to accounts, Tesla used it to transmit tens of thousands of watts of power wirelessly; it could generate millions of volts of electricity and produce lightning bolts more than one-hundred feet (30 m) long. Tesla posted a large fence around it with a sign "Keep Out – Great Danger".

Tesla became the first man to create electrical effects on the scale of lightning. The MT produced thunder which was heard as far away as Cripple Creek. People near the lab would observe sparks emitting from the ground to their feet and through their shoes. Some have observed electrical sparks from the fire hydrants (Tesla for a time grounded out to the plumbing of the city). The area around the laboratory would glow with a blue corona (similar to St. Elmo’s Fire).

One of Tesla’s experiments with the MT destroyed Colorado Springs Electric Company’s generator by backfeeding the city’s power generators, and blacked out the city. The company denied Tesla further access to the backup generator’s feed if he did not repair the primary generator at his own expense; it was working again in a few days.
Tuned circuits

Tesla also constructed many smaller resonance transformers and discovered the concept of tuned electrical circuits. He also developed a number of coherers for separating and perceiving electromagnetic waves and designed rotating coherers which he used to detect the unique types of electromagnetic phenomenon he observed. They had a mechanism of geared wheels driven by a coiled spring-drive mechanism which rotated small glass cylinders. These experiments were the final stage of years of work on synchronized tuned electrical circuits.

These transceivers were constructed to demonstrate how signals could be "tuned in". Tesla logged in his diary on July 3, 1899 that a separate resonance transformer tuned to the same high frequency as a larger high-voltage resonance transformer would transceive energy from the larger coil, acting as a transmitter of wireless energy, which was used to confirm Tesla’s patent for radio during later disputes in the courts. These air core high-frequency resonate coils were the predecessors of systems from radio to radar and medical magnetic resonance imaging devices.

Propagation and resonance

On July 3, 1899, Tesla discovered terrestrial stationary waves within the earth. He demonstrated that the Earth behaves as a smooth polished conductor and possesses electrical vibrations. He experimented with waves characterized by a lack of vibration at points, between which areas of maximum vibration occur periodically. These standing waves were produced by confining waves within constructed conductive boundaries. Tesla demonstrated that the Earth could respond at predescribed frequencies of electrical vibrations. At this time, Tesla realized that it was possible to transceive power around the globe. A few years later, George Westinghouse stopped funding Tesla’s research when Tesla showed him that he could offer free electricity to the whole world by simply "ramming a stick in the earth in your backyard". Westinghouse said he would go bankrupt if that happened.

Tesla conducted experiments contributing to the understanding of electromagnetic propagation and the Earth’s resonance. It is well documented (from various photos from the time) that he lit hundreds of lamps wirelessly at a distance of up to twenty-five miles (40 km). He transmitted signals several kilometres and lit neon tubes conducting through the ground. He researched ways to transmit energy wirelessly over long distances. He transmitted extremely low frequencies through the ground in his experiments and made mathematical calculations and computations based on his experiments and discovered that the resonant frequency of the Earth was approximately 8 Hz (Hertz). In the 1950s, researchers confirmed resonant frequency was in this range (interesting to note, Theta brain waves also cycle in this range).

Cosmic waves

In the Colorado Springs lab, Tesla recorded what he concluded were extraterrestrial radio signals and announced his findings in some of the scientific journals of the time. [5] His announcements and data were rejected by the scientific community who did not believe him. He notes measurements of repetitive signals from his receiver which are substantially different from the signals he had noted from storms and earth noise. Specifically, he later recalled that the signals appeared in groups of clicks 1, 2, 3, and 4 clicks together. He stated in the article "A Giant Eye to See Round the World", of February 25, 1923, that:

"Twenty-two years ago, while experimenting in Colorado with a wireless power plant, I obtained extraordinary experimental evidence of the existence of life on Mars. I had perfected a wireless receiver of extraordinary sensitiveness, far beyond anything known, and I caught signals which I interpreted as meaning 1–2–3–4. I believe the Martians used numbers for communication because numbers are universal."

Clearly, Tesla felt the signal groups originated on the planet Mars. In 1996 Corum and Corum published an analysis of Jovian plasma torus signals which indicate that there was a correspondence between the setting of Mars at Colorado Springs, and the cessation of signals from Jupiter in the summer of 1899 when Tesla was there. Further, analysis by the Corums indicate that Tesla’s transceiver was sensitive in the 18 kHz gap in the Kennelly-Heaviside layer which would have allowed that reception from Jupiter. Therefore, there is evidence the signals Tesla noticed came from Jupiter, among other possible sources. Tesla spent the latter part of his life trying to signal Mars.

It is important to recognize that when he says he "recorded" these signals, it is meant that he wrote down the data and his impressions of what he had heard. He did release reports at the time. Tesla¹s initial announcement of the existence of extraterrestrial radio signals was in 1899. In March of 1907, Tesla wrote about signaling to Mars in Harvard Magazine and how it was a problem of electrical engineering. Additional descriptions come from remembrances twenty years later. All this was met with resistance and disbelief by his contemporaries.

Colorado departure

Tesla left Colorado Springs on January 7, 1900. The lab was torn down, broken up, and its contents sold to pay debts. The Colorado experiments prepared Tesla for his next project, the establishment of a wireless power transmission facility that would be known as Wardenclyffe. On March 21, 1900, Tesla was granted US685012 patent for the means for increasing the intensity of electrical oscillations.

Wardenclyffe

Main article: Wardenclyffe TowerIn 1900, with $150,000 (51%) from J. Pierpont Morgan, Tesla began planning the Wardenclyffe Tower facility. In June 1902, Tesla’s lab operations were moved to Wardenclyffe from Houston Street.

Among the various application of the 700-plus patents accumulated by Tesla, the most controversial today is his Wardenclyffe Tower. The tower was billed as the start of a global system for wireless telecommunications but was also intended by Tesla as a demonstration of wireless electrical power distribution. In 1903, upon hearing of Tesla’s plans for wireless power transmission, Morgan refused any more funding to support the Wardenclyffe Tower project. The tower was finally dismantled for scrap during wartime. Newspapers of the time labeled Wardenclyffe "Tesla’s million-dollar folly."

Source: http://www.crystalinks.com/tesla.html


Wireless Electricity Of Nikola Tesla

by Melvin D. Saunders

If a single one-megaton nuclear warhead were exploded 300 miles over the center of the country, a high-voltage electromagnetic pulse would in theory disrupt communication and electrical systems all over the continental U.S. Gamma rays emitted by such an explosion would instantly strip away the electrons from air molecules in the upper atmosphere in roughly a circular, pancake-shaped zone. The free electrons would then accelerate radially with the earth’s magnetic field, separating from the heavier, positively charged ions and creating a downward directed high-voltage electromagnetic pulse. This in turn results in electrical surges in all exposed conductors on the ground.

When Nikola Tesla discovered alternating current (AC) electricity, he had great difficulty convincing men of his time to believe in it. Thomas Edison was in favor of direct current (DC) electricity and opposed AC electricity strenuously. Tesla eventually sold his rights to his alternating current patents to George Westinghouse for $1,000,000. After paying off his investors, Tesla spent his remaining funds on his other inventions and culminated his efforts in a major breakthrough in 1899 at Colorado Springs by transmitting 100 million volts of high-frequency electric power wirelessly over a distance of 26 miles at which he lit up a bank of 200 light bulbs and ran one electric motor! With this souped up version of his Tesla coil, Tesla claimed that only 5% of the transmitted energy was lost in the process. But broke of funds again, he looked for investors to back his project of broadcasting electric power in almost unlimited amounts to any point on the globe. The method he would use to produce this wireless power was to employ the earth’s own resonance with its specific vibrational frequency to conduct AC electricity via a large electric oscillator. When J.P. Morgan agreed to underwrite Tesla’s project, a strange structure was begun and almost completed near Wardenclyffe in Long Island, N.Y. Looking like a huge lattice-like, wooden oil derrick with a mushroom cap, it had a total height of 200 feet. Then suddenly, Morgan withdrew his support to the project in 1906, and eventually the structure was dynamited and brought down in 1917.

……..A Tesla coil is a special transformer that can take the 110 volt electricity from your house and convert it rapidly to a great deal of high-voltage, high-frequency, low-amperage power. The high-frequency output of even a small Tesla coil can light up fluorescent tubes held several feet away without any wire connections. Even a large number of spent or discarded fluorescent tubes (their burned out cathodes are irrelevant) will light up if hung near a long wire running from a Tesla coil while using less than 100 watts drawn by the coil itself when plugged into an electrical outlet! Since the Tesla coil steps up the voltage to such a high degree, the alternating oscillations achieve sufficient excitations within the tubes of gases to produce lighting at a minimal expense of original power! Fluorescent tubes can be held under high-tension wires to produce the same lighting up effect. Remember the farmer a few years ago who was caught with an adaptive transformer under a set of high tension lines that ran over his property? Through the air, he pulled down all the power he needed to run his farm without using any connecting apparatus to the lines overhead! Any electrical engineer with the proper materials can do the same thing.

……..Incandescent bulbs burn high resistance filaments that gobble up energy. Fluorescent tubes burn filaments (cathodes) to create an electrical flow that sets their internal phosphorus coatings aglow. Using a Tesla coil, high voltage AC can light up glass-enclosed vacuum bulbs coolly without any gases inside them at all! Any number of cold light bulbs can be lit using only one Tesla coil, and since there is nothing inside them to burn out, they can last indefinitely. It seems like a low cost form of street lighting, doesn’t it?

……..When Tesla was determining the resonant frequencies of the earth to potentially transmit unlimited electric power, he also recognized frequencies that acted as a damping field to nullify electric power. With the advent of the wireless and Tesla’s unique investigations into broadcasting electricity, a dozen or more inventors thereafter announced their own means for transmitting electrical energy without wires. One British inventor, H. Grindell-Matthews, actually demonstrated his "mystery ray" apparatus in 1924 to a Popular Science Monthly writer in London (See: Pop. Sci. Monthly, Aug. 1924, P. 33). When his beam was directed toward the magneto system of a gasoline engine, it stopped the system. Afterwards, it ignited gun powder, lit an electric lamp bulb from a distance and killed a mouse in seconds! Grindell-Matthews said the secret was involved with the "carrier beam" he used to conduct a high-voltage, low-frequency electrical current. During 1936, Guglielmo Marconi experimented with extremely low frequency (ELF) waves and displayed their exceptional ability to penetrate metallic shielding. These waves could affect electrical devices, overload circuits and cause machines like generators, electric motors and automobiles to stall. Diesel engines, which do not rely on electrical ignition, were not affected. Mysteriously, Marconi’s research on the subject was never found after the war.

……..The above subject is just one of the many creative alternatives mentioned in the new manual, Creative Alternatives For A Changing Worldoffered by:
Creative Alternatives, P.O. Box 250, Palmdale, FL 33944 – USA

Order Creative Alternatives


Schumann Resonance

Between the nearly perfectly conducting terrestrial surface and ionosphere, a resonating cavity is formed. Broadband electromagnetic impulses, like those from lightning flashes, fill this cavity, and create globally the so-called Schumann resonances at frequencies 5 – 50 Hz (Schumann, 1952; Bliokh et al., 1980; Sentman, 1987). The nominal average frequencies observed are 7.8, 14, 20, 26, 33, 39, and 45 Hz with slight diurnal variation (the three first lines can be seen in the figure displaying data from northern Finland, the Kilpisjärvi station). It has been suggested that the intensity of these lines could be used to monitor the global lightning activity, especially after the local time modulation by changes in D region height has been removed (e.g., Sentman and Fraser, 1991).

Note that the ionospheric Alfvén resonator -related spectral resonance structures (SRS) are formed due to the lightnings, and cover partly the same frequency range. In the figure here only the two first SRS lines are clearly visible. Finally, the strong spike in the figure just below 17 Hz is due to the Swedish railroads!

Standard magnetometers are not able to measure the Schumann resonances, and even the search coil (i.e., pulsation) magnetometers are most often sampled at about 0.1 Hz that does not allow such studies. Special equipment are thus needed. That also holds true if one wants to study lightning activity with Schumann resonances in other planetary systems: this might work at least for Venus and Jupiter!

The Schumann Resonance: a set of peaks in the ELF portion of the Earth’s electromagnetic field spectrum. ELF – Extremely Low Frequencies (or ELF) refers to a band of radio frequencies from 3 Hz to 300 Hz. ELF is used by the US Navy to communicate with submerged submarines. The extremely high electrical conductivity of seawater shields submarines from most electromagnetic communications. Signals in the ELF frequency range, however, can penetrate much more deeply. The low transmission rate of most ELF communications limits their use as communications channels; generally an ELF signal serves to request that a submarine surface and initiate some other form of contact. One of the difficulties posed when broadcasting in the ELF frequency range is antenna size. In order to transmit internationally using ELF frequencies, an extremely large antenna is required. The US maintains two sites, in Wisconsin and Michigan. Both sites use long power lines as antennae, in multiple strands ranging from 14 to 28 miles long. Considerable amounts of power are generated and emitted by ELF, and there have been some concerns over the possible ecological impact of such signals

The electromagnetic field (EMF) is composed of two related vectorial fields, the electric field and the magnetic field. This means that the vectors (E and B) that characterize the field each have a value defined at each point of space and time. If only E, the electric field, is nonzero and is constant in time, the field is said to be an electrostatic field.

The electromagnetic field generates a force F on a charged particle, given by the Lorentz equation where q is the charge of the particle, and v is its current velocity (expressed as a vector.) The behavior of electromagnetic fields can be described with Maxwell’s equations, and their quantum basis by quantum electrodynamics.

Scientists believe that the Schumann resonance is due to the space between the surface of the Earth and the ionosphere acting as a resonant cavity that is then excited by energy from lightning strikes. A resonant cavity is a cavity in which standing waves can be built up. It is used in lasers. The lowest-frequency (and highest-intensity) mode of the Schumann resonance is at a frequency of approximately 7.8 Hz. The phenomenon is named after W. O. Schumann, who predicted this phenomenon in the 1950s, and helped detect its existence.

The ionosphere is the part of the atmosphere that is ionized by solar radiation, and too tenuous to be cooled by contact with other air. It forms the inner edge of the magnetosphere and has practical importance because it reflects radio waves to distant places on Earth. The ionosphere is generally recognized to have three, sometimes four layers. The D layer is the innermost layer, and mostly absorbs radio waves. The E layer is the middle layer. The F layer combines into one layer at night, but in sunlight divides into two layers, the F1 and F2. The F layers are responsible for most skywave propagation of radio, and are thickest and most reflective of radio on the side of the Earth facing the sun. Scientists explore the structure of the ionosphere by bouncing radio waves of different frequencies from it, and using special receivers to detect how the reflected waves have changed from the transmitted waves.

Schumann Resonance & Zero Point

December 1999 -By Gregg Bradon

Changes are occurring on the physical, emotions, mental, and spiritual levels.

Ancient prophecies predicted it. Indigenous traditions honor it. Changes within the Earth are affecting your sleep patterns, relationships, the ability to regulate your immune system and your perception of time.

You are living a process of initiation that was demonstrated over 2,000 years ago, preparing you to accept tremendous change within your body. That change is happening now.

Migraine headaches, tiredness electrical sensations in the limbs and spinal column Cramps in the muscular networks Flu like symptoms Intense dreams.

These could all be caused by the changes taking place on Earth now!

The human body will become more sensitive as a result of the new vibrations. The resonance of Earth (Schumann Resonance) has been 7.8Hz for thousands of years.

Since 1980 it has risen to over 12Hz.

This means that 16 hours now equate to a 24 hour day.

Time appears to be speeding up!

The physical body has already begun to change. A new light body is being created. Our DNA is being re-programmed from the Universe(as predicted in the Mayan Prophecy).

We are going from 2 strand back to 12 strand DNA. Greater intuitive and healing abilities will emerge.

As the Earth’s magnetic field drops, the bio-energetic systems of the living organisms of Earth are likewise responding, thus, altering any previous entrainments that they may have had due to their resonance with the Earth’s field.

Our "auras" are cleaning out! This means that, correspondingly, there is a proportional increase in the "strength of the electrical component." Our thoughts have more punch! Quite simply, as our field clears, our power goes up!

This is saying that quite naturally, in response to the Earth Changes, our emotional shields are loosening up– we are actually meshing with each other’s more and more; and our intentions are getting stronger– our thoughts are reaching out even farther than ever before; and so, there is much less of a buffer zone, or less delay time, between our "Intentionality" and its "Actuality by a Universal-Source" in our usual interactions with this world and those in it.

This is being noticed all around us, for example, in the increased reports of such things as effectual prayer, spontaneous remissions and spiritual-energy healings, and in the increased general use of "intentional manifestation" or "co-creation" skills as advocated by proponents of "abundance affirmation," "guided visualization," etc… and also in the synchronistic happenings that are occurring more and more frequently to many people.

Gregg Braden tells of the scientific proof of the Earth passing through the Photon Beltand the slowing of the Earth’s rotation.

At the same time there is an increase in the resonant frequency of the Earth (Schumann Resonance). When the Earth stops its rotation and the resonance frequency reaches 13 cycles we will be at a zero point magnetic field. The Earth will be stopped, and in 2 or 3 days it will start turning again in the opposite direction. This will produce a reversal in the magnetic fields around the earth and so forth.

Geophysical Condition #1: Earth’s Rising Base Frequency: Earth’s background base frequency, or "heartbeat," – called Schumann Resonance, or SR – is rising dramatically.

Though it varies among geographical regions, for decades the overall measurement was 7.8 cycles per second.

This was once thought to be a constant; global military communications developed on this frequency.

Recent reports set the rate at over 11 cycles,and climbing. Science doesn’t know why, or what to make of it.

Gregg Braden found data collected by Norwegian and Russian researchers on this; it’s not widely reported in the U.S. (The only reference to SR to be found in the Seattle Library reference section, is tied to the weather.

Science acknowledges SR as a sensitive indicator of temperature variations and worldwide weather conditions. Braden believes the fluctuating SR may be a factor in the severe storms, floods, and weather of recent years.)

Geophysical Condition #2: Earth’s Diminishing Magnetic Field

While earth’s "pulse" rate is rising, her magnetic field strength, on the other hand, is declining.

According to Professor Bannerjee of the University of New Mexico, the field has lost up to half its intensity in the last 4,000 years.

Because a forerunner of magnetic polar reversals is this field strength, Prof. Bannerjee believes that another reversal is due. Braden believes that because these cyclical Shifts are associated with reversals, Earth’s geological record indicating magnetic reversals also marks previous Shifts in history.

Within the enormous time scale represented, there were quite a few of them.

What is a Schumann Resonance?

The Earth behaves like an enormous electric circuit. The atmosphere is actually a weak conductor and if there were no sources of charge, its existing electric charge would diffuse away in about 10 minutes.

There is a ‘cavity ‘defined by the surface of the Earth and the inner edge of the ionosphere 55 kilometers up.

At any moment, the total charge residing in this cavity is 500,000 Coulombs. There is a vertical current flow between the ground and the ionosphere of 1 – 3 x 10^-12 Amperes per square meter.

The resistance of the atmosphere is 200 Ohms. The voltage potential is 200,000 Volts. There are about 1000 lightning storms at any given moment worldwide.

Each produces .5 to 1 Ampere and these collectively account for the measured current flow in the Earth’s ‘electromagnetic’ cavity.

The Schumann Resonances are quasi standing wave electromagnetic waves that exist in this cavity. Like waves on a spring, they are not present all the time, but have to be ‘excited’ to be observed. They are not caused by anything internal to the Earth, its crust or its core.

They seem to be related to electrical activity in the atmosphere, particularly during times of intense lightning activity. They occur at several frequencies between 6 and 50 cycles per second; specifically 7.8, 14, 20, 26, 33, 39 and 45 Hertz, with a daily variation of about +/- 0 .5 Hertz. So long as the properties of Earth’s electromagnetic cavity remains about the same, these frequencies remain the same.

Presumably there is somechange due to the solar sunspot cycle as the Earth’s ionosphere changes in response to the 11-year cycle of solar activity.Schumann resonances are most easily seen between 2000 and 2200 UT.

Given that the earth’s atmosphere carries a charge, a current and a voltage, it is not surprising to find such electromagnetic waves.

The resonant properties of this terrestrial cavity were first predicted by the German physicist W. O. Schumann between 1952 and 1957, and first detected by Schumann and Konig in 1954.

The first spectral representation of this phenomenon was prepared by Balser and Wagner in 1960. Much of the research in the last 20 years has been conducted by the Department of the Navy who investigate Extremely Low Frequency communication with submarines.

1. Time will appear to speed up as we approach Zero Point. A 24 hour day will seem to about 16 hours or less. Remember the Schumann Resonance (or "heart beat" of Mother Earth) has been 7.8 cycles for thousands of years, but has been rising since 1980. It is at about 12 cycles at present. It stops at 13 cycles.

2. Zero Point or the Shift of the Ages has been predicted by ancient peoples for thousands of years. There have been many shifts including the one that always occurs every 13,000 years at each half ofthe 26,000 year, Procession of the Equinox.

3. Zero Point or a flip of the magnetic poles will probably happen soon, within the next few years. It could possibly synchronise with the Earth’s four cycle biorhythm that occurs every 20 years on the 12th of August. The next occurance is 12th August 2003. The Philadelphia Experiment and Montauk Project (secret military time travelling) both locked up to the 12th August/20 year biorhythm.

4. It is said that after Zero Point the Sun will rise in the west and set in the east, approx. Past occurances of this change have been found in ancient records.

5. Interestingly, the New World Order plan to be in power by 2003. This may or may not happen, depending on many factors and agendas. Stay centred and follow your intuition.

6. The Zero Point flip will probably introduce us to the 4th dimension. Here, everything we think or desire will instantly manifest. This includes love and fear. Our INTENTION will be of utmost importance.

7. Most technology that we know will cease to operate. Possible exceptions could be technology based on so called "Zero Point" or free energy.

8. Our physical body is changing as we approach Zero Point. Our DNA is being "upgraded" to 12 strand. A new light body is being created. We are becoming more intuitive.

9. The Mayan Calendar predicted all the changes that are occuring now. They say we are going beyond technology and back to the natural cycles of nature and the Universe. By 2012 we will have entered the 5th Dimension (after the flip to the 4th Dimension at Zero Point).

10. All this information is not fearful. Be prepared for changes that will bring in the new age of light. We are going beyond money and time where fear based concepts are totally dissolved.

Crystal Skulls

Skulls are humanity’s foremost symbol of death, and a powerful icon in the visual vocabularies of cultures all over the globe. Thirteen crystal skulls of apparently ancient origin have been found in parts of Mexico, Central America and South America, comprising one of the most fascinating subjects of 20th Century archaeology.

These skulls, found near the ancient ruins of Mayan and Aztec civilizations (with some evidence linking the skulls with past civilization in Peru) are a mystery as profound as the Pyramids of Egypt, the Nazca Lines of Peru, or Stonehenge. Some of the skulls are believed to be between 5,000 and 36,000 years old.

Many indigenous people speak of their remarkable magical and healing properties, but nobody really knows where they came from or what they were used for.

Were they left behind after the destruction of a previous world, such as Atlantis? Are they simply ingenious modern fakes or can they really enable us to see deeply into the past and predict the future?

Much research is currently being done on the skulls. However, their origin is still a baffling mystery. They seem to defy logic. Everything that is known about lapidary work indicates that the skulls should have been shattered fractured, or fallen apart when carved.


Famous Crystal Skulls

This report examines the known history of crystal skulls, various viewpoints on where they might have came from, and the secrets they may reveal.

Copyright 1996 ParaScope, Inc.

The Mitchell-Hedges Crystal Skull

The most widely celebrated and mysterious crystal skull is the Mitchell-Hedges Skull, for at least two good reasons. First, it is very similar in form to an actual human skull, even featuring a fitted removable jawbone. Most known crystal skulls are of a more stylized structure, often with unrealistic features and teeth that are simply etched onto a single skull piece.
Second, it is impossible to say how the Mitchell-Hedges skull was constructed. From a technical standpoint, it appears to be an impossible object which today’s most talented sculptors and engineers would be unable to duplicate.


The Anna Mitchell-Hedges Skull
was discovered in British Honduras in 1927

The discovery of this baffling artifact is a controversial matter. It was brought into prominence by British explorer F. A. Mitchell-Hedges, who claimed that his daughter unearthed it in 1924. Mitchell-Hedges led an expedition in the ancient Mayan ruins of Lubaantun, in Belize (then British Honduras), searching for evidence of Atlantis.

The story goes that his daughter, Anna, was rummaging inside a structure believed to have once been a temple, when she found the beautifully carved cranium of the crystal skull. It was lacking its jawbone, but the matching mandible was found three months later, some 25 feet away from the first discovery. Mitchell-Hedges claimed that he refused to take the skull away, and offered it to the local priests, but the Mayans gave the skull back to him as a gift upon his departure.

It now appears that this tale of the skull’s discovery was entirely fabricated. Mitchell-Hedges apparently purchased the skull at an auction at Sothebys in London, in 1943. This has been verified by documents at the British Museum, which had bid against Mitchell-Hedges for the crystal artifact.

This revelation is consistent with the known history of Mitchell-Hedges’s involvement with the skull. There are no photographs of the skull among those that were taken during his Lubaatun expedition, and there is no documentation of Mitchell-Hedges displaying or even acknowledging the skull prior to 1943.

The skull remains in the possession of the octogenarian Anna Mitchell-Hedges. She resides in Canada and displays the skull on frequent tours. Anna has maintained for all these years that she discovered the skull, even though there is reason to doubt that she was present at the Lubaatun expedition at all.

The Mitchell-Hedges skull is made of clear quartz crystal, and both cranium and mandible are believed to have come from the same solid block. It weighs 11.7 pounds and is about five inches high, five inches wide, and seven inches long. Except for slight anomalies in the temples and cheekbones, it is a virtually anatomically correct replica of a human skull. Because of its small size and other characteristics, it is thought more closely to resemble a female skull — and this has led some to refer to the Mitchell-Hedges skull as a “she.”

The Mitchell-Hedges family loaned the skull to Hewlett-Packard Laboratories for extensive study in 1970. Art restorer Frank Dorland oversaw the testing at the Santa Clara, California, computer equipment manufacturer, a leading facility for crystal research. The HP examinations yielded some startling results.

Researchers found that the skull had been carved against the natural axis of the crystal. Modern crystal sculptors always take into account the axis, or orientation of the crystal’s molecular symmetry, because if they carve “against the grain,” the piece is bound to shatter — even with the use of lasers and other high-tech cutting methods.
To compound the strangeness, HP could find no microscopic scratches on the crystal which would indicate it had been carved with metal instruments. Dorland’s best hypothesis for the skull’s construction is that it was roughly hewn out with diamonds, and then the detail work was meticulously done with a gentle solution of silicon sand and water. The exhausting job — assuming it could possibly be done in this way — would have required man-hours adding up to 300 years to complete.

Under these circumstances, experts believe that successfully crafting a shape as complex as the Mitchell-Hedges skull is impossible; as one HP researcher is said to have remarked, “The damned thing simply shouldn’t be.”


The British Crystal Skull and the Paris Crystal Skull

There is a pair of similar skulls known as the British Crystal Skull and the Paris Crystal Skull. Both are said to have been bought by mercenaries in Mexico in the 1890s, possibly at the same time.

They are so similar in size and shape that some have guessed that one was copied to produce the other. In comparison to the Mitchell-Hedges skull, they are made of cloudier clear crystal and are not nearly as finely sculpted. The features are superficially etched and appear incomplete, without discretely formed jawbones. The British Crystal Skull is on display at London’s Museum of Mankind, and the Trocadero Museum of Paris houses the Paris Crystal Skull.


The British Crystal Skull.
It is currently residing in the British Museum of Man in London, England,
and has been there since 1898. It is a one piece clear quartz full size quartz crystal skull.


The British Crystal Skull. It is currently residing in the British Museum of Man in London, England,
and has been there since 1898. It is a one piece clear quartz full size quartz crystal skull.
Image Source


The Paris Crystal Skull
It  is currently residing in the Trocadero Museum in Paris, France.
You may notice a slight indentation on the top, which is a hole that was cut into the skull purported to hold a cross.


Mayan Crystal Skull and the Amethyst Skull

Further examples of primitively sculpted skulls are a couple called the Mayan Crystal Skull and the Amethyst Skull. They were discovered in the early 1900s in Guatemala and Mexico, respectively, and were brought to the U.S. by a Mayan priest. The Amethyst Skull is made of purple quartz and the Mayan skull is clear, but the two are otherwise very alike. Like the Mitchell-Hedges skull, both of them were studied at Hewlett-Packard, and they too were found to be inexplicably cut against the axis of the crystal.


Amethyst skull [ Image Source ]

Texas Crystal Skull (Max)

A skull known as “Max,” or the Texas Crystal Skull, is a single-piece, clear skull weighing 18 pounds. It reportedly originated in Guatemala, then passed from a Tibetan spiritualist to JoAnn Parks of Houston, Texas. The Parks family allows visitors to observe Max and they display the skull at various exhibitions across the U.S.

ET Skull

“ET” is a smoky quartz skull found in the early 20th Century in Central America. It was given its nickname because its pointed cranium and exaggerated overbite make it look like the skull of an alien being. ET is part of the private collection of Joke Van Dietan, who tours with her skulls to share the healing powers she believes they possess.

Rose Quartz Crystal Skull

The only known crystal skull that comes close to resembling the Mitchell-Hedges skull is one called the Rose Quartz Crystal Skull, which was reported near the border of Honduras and Guatemala. It is not clear in color and is slightly larger than the Mitchell-Hedges, but boasts a comparable level of craftsmanship, including a removable mandible.

Brazilian Crystal Skull

This 13.8 pound life-size skull was donated to the museum’s Section of Minerals by a Brazilian gem dealer in 2004.

Brazilian Quartz Crystal Skull. Image Source >>


“Compassion” – Atlantean Crystal Skull

A newly discovered Crystal skull that rivals the Mitchell Hedges Skull. Atlantean is what Maya Shaman and elder Hunbatz Men said when he first examined it at the crystal skull conference on 9/9/9.

This skull was in a warehouse in Africa for 22 years and then 7 years in storage in an import store. I found it 11 months ago today. It is human size and it has the removable jaw. It is the same dimensions as the Mitchell Hedges Skull with some added features.

Below: This view is of an Iron Oxide Occlusion between two of the 3 total layers on skull

When examined by a Dr. Minch, 20 year head of Geology dept. at the Natural History Museum in Santa Barbara showed how the front teeth or Maxilla angles to it’s right! He felt this was one example of a hand carved Skull. “A machine made skull would have been straight.”

This skull is now available for inspection in California.

More information can be found at: www.atlanteanskull.com


Origin Theories: Celestial Gifts or Skullduggery?

Regardless of any unearthly properties the crystal skulls may or may not possess, the question remains: where did they come from? There are countless hypotheses that they are the legacy of some higher intelligence. Many believe they were created by extraterrestrials or beings in Atlantis or Lemuria. One elaborate theory maintains that the skulls were left behind by a sophisticated Inner Earth society which lives at the hollow center of our planet, and there are thirteen “master skulls” which contain the history of these people.
The most obvious answer to the mystery is that native artisans in Latin America or elsewhere crafted the skulls themselves. The Mayans are most often associated with them, although some doubt that they could have made the skulls, and not simply because of the technical conundrum the job poses. One theory holds the Aztecs as a more likely candidate to have created them. Skull imagery figures prominently in Aztec art and religious symbols, and not in that of the Mayans. The Aztecs were also more highly skilled in sculpting with crystal. It could be that the skulls found in Mayan ruins are actually displaced Aztec relics… or, as some suspect, this incongruity may indicate that some accounts of the skulls’ origins are phony.
Many skeptics feel that the crystal skulls are probably of a much more recent vintage than their accompanying stories suggest. This, they believe, is the best way to explain their existence, since no one could have created them without technologies available only within the past century. Since carbon-dating only works on organic substances, it is impossible to determine just how old a crystal skull is. But one recent study found reasonable signs of some skulls’ relative youth.
A May broadcast of the BBC documentary series “Everyman” reported on studies of a number of crystal skulls and other artifacts of supposedly ancient origin conducted at the British Museum. Using electron microscopes, the researchers found that two of the skulls possessed straight, perfectly-spaced surface markings, indicating the use of a modern polishing wheel. Genuine ancient objects would show haphazard tiny scratches from the hand-polishing process. The report speculated that these skulls were actually made in Germany within the past 150 years.
Even the regal Mitchell-Hedges skull is not without scandalous accusations of fraud. Some believe that F.A. Mitchell-Hedges had the piece commissioned by a sculptor, and planted it in the Lubaantun ruins for his daughter to find as a spectacular birthday present.
The validity of this charge is uncertain, but even if the Mitchell-Hedges skull is of modern origin, its structure is no less extraordinary. In all likelihood, every crystal skull in the world was fashioned by plain old human beings of some sort, and regardless of whether the work was carried out five years ago or five hundred years ago, we still don’t have any idea how they did it.

Source: Parascope


The Crystal Skull Enigma

by N Charles C. Pelton

In the realm of ancient artifacts there are few antiquities that are as thought provoking as the carved quartz crystal skulls. Very little is known about these ancient wonders of the world, largely due to the fact that so few of them exist which are accessible to the researcher. In the last few years, interest has risen intensely in these works of antiquity. For many years, when the subject of the crystal skulls was discussed, few people were aware of the fact that the Mitchell- Hedges skull was not the only crystal skull known to man. It may have been the most perfectly carved, even viewed by more people throughout the world than any other skull, but, certainly not the only skull. In fact, there are many skulls in various locations around the world which range in size from a few pounds, or softball sized, to over forty pounds.

Only a few crystal skulls have been expertly authenticated as ancient. Many have been carved within the last five years. Presently, the accepted authentication by which a carved skull can be termed ancient is through a complicated process of casting a mold of the skull and placing it under an electron microscope to examine the minute markings left by the carver. These markings are the clues by which the age of the carving is determined. The telltale pattern of the marking will verify what method was used to carve and polish the skull; thereby, the antiquity expert is able to confirm the age based on methods used on other known works which range from the ancient to the very contemporary. By comparing these various methods with those of the crystal skull, a time-line is developed which will place the skull along that line.

The widely known Mitchell-Hedges skull, located in Canada, one of the most beautiful skulls I have had the pleasure of seeing, is now shrouded in controversy. It is presently suggested that the skull is not ancient, but a work of more recent times, perhaps orchestrated by F.A. Mitchell-Hedges, himself, to promote interest and financing for his adventures. Coined The Skull of Doom’, by some associates of the adventurer, actually a misnomer for a term used in the 1930s, The Skull of Dunn. Dunn was an associate of F.A., on the expedition to Luubantun, in 1927, which is when young Anna Mitchell-Hedges, then age 17, reports she found the skull in the ruins of a temple.

The Museum of Man, in London, contains a crystal skull which is called the Aztec Skull. It is no longer on display in that museum. Museum personnel as well as visitors claim the skull moves on its own within the glass case in which it is enclosed. It was acquired by the museum at the turn of the century from an antiquity dealer in New York.

The Paris museum of Man also contains a crystal skull called The Aztec Skull, which is no longer on display. Both the Paris Skull, and the British Skull are much smaller than the Mitchell-Hedges skull, and not nearly as perfectly carved or as clear.

In more recent times, several quartz crystal skulls have appeared. Some are suggested ancient by their owners. Extensive examinations of these skulls have, however, determined many are not ancient at all. It is not certain as to the origin of these imposters. In the early 1980s, a human-sized quartz crystal skull surfaced in Texas. It was in the possession of Norbu Chen, a Tibetan healer. The skull was given to Carl and Jo Ann Parks to satisfy a debt. The skull was placed in a cosmetic case and stored on the floor of a closet in their Houston home for several years. It was while Jo Ann Parks was watching television that she realized that her skull may be an important artifact.

The program was about the Mitchell-Hedges skull, and F.R. Nick Nocerino, a world-renowned expert in crystal skull research, was a guest on the show. After viewing the program, Jo Ann, contacted Nocerino, upon which he traveled to Houston from his home near San Francisco to examine the skull. He determined that the skull was authentic and that it was ancient. He had indeed been aware of the existence of the skull, but had not been able to determine its location. Soon after Nocerino’s visit, Jo Ann, after several discussions with the rock, as she fondly referred to it, was told its name was Max.

Also in the mid 80s, Joke van Dieten Maasland, who presently resides in Miami Beach, Florida, acquired a smokey quartz crystal skull from a dealer in Los Angeles. It was reported that this skull had been in the possession of a family in Guatemala, whose parents found the skull in1906, while excavating a Mayan Temple. Joke credits the skull, which she calls E.T., as instrumental in a personal healing of a brain tumor. She shares the story in her book, Messengers of Ancient Wisdom.

In early 1990, a skull weighing more than 40 pounds, which was carved from rock quartz crystal but hollowed out, was donated to the Smithsonian Institution, in Washington. There was little or no documentation as to its authenticity. Since there was no documentable evidence of the age or origin of the skull, the curator determined not to place the skull in the museum for viewing until its authenticity was established.

During a lecture tour in Mexico many years ago, Nocerino was invited to a location in Guerro Provence, to assist in locating the buried ruins of an ancient city. It was during this visit that Nocerino provided the information as to the location of what he thought was an ancient temple. (Due to the current political situation in Mexico, the safety of those currently involved with this excavation would be compromised should I reveal the exact location of the excavation, or the name of the city.) Excavation of that location later revealed several carved crystal artifacts. Among these artifacts were two crystal skulls, one of which is currently owned by Nocerino, which is 13 pounds 3 ounces and is carved of clear quartz crystal. Nocerino calls the skull Sha-Na-Ra, in memory of a Shaman Healer he once knew. The second is currently owned by DaEl Walker, a well- known crystal researcher and author of several crystal healing books. It is smaller than Sha-Na-Ra, about 9 pounds, also quartz crystal. DaEl calls it The Rainbow Skull, due to the rainbow of colors that dance through the skull when in the natural light.

There were many other artifacts found at this location. Several small carved crystal skulls, half skulls which were hollow and a very rare and powerful item we call The Jaguar Man. It is five inches high, two inches in diameter and is carved of quartz crystal. It depicts the head of a Jaguar, with the head of a man in its mouth. The facial features of the man do not appear Mayan. This piece is currently owned by me, and is being exposed to extensive research. Excavation continues in this area and additional finds are expected.

The Pelton Foundation of Applied Paranormal Research, The Institute of Psychic and Hypnotic sciences and The Society of Crystal Skulls, International, launched a research project and video documentary which included the Rainbow, Sha-Na-Ra, E.T., Jesuit, Max, and the Agate Chip skulls. Members of the various organizations who were expert in the field of psychometry, scrying and gazing were brought in to work with the skulls in an attempt to learn more about the skulls using these methods. It would be the first time in recorded history that more than two authentic carved quartz crystal skulls would be together in one room at the same time.

Our project included X-rays, to determine if any were broken or had been more than one piece and glued together, laser light penetration, and startling close-up video of the skulls. The results of phase one of the project can be viewed in our production Skull Trek: The journey of the Crystal Skulls. This production also includes information and photographs of 16 additional crystal skulls, such as the Mitchell-Hedges, Paris, British, Marin, San Jose and Amethyst skulls to mention just a few. Portions of the scrying sessions are also provided.

Psychometry and scrying provided glimpses of the past and wonderful scenarios of ancient ceremonies. A connection with the fabled Atlantis was also brought out during one of the sessions. What were these magnificent objects used for? Who carved them? Is it possible that contemporary society can make use of their wisdom for physical and mental healing? Further research may provide the answers. Perhaps it will provide only more questions!

During my personal research with the skulls, I stumbled upon a phenomenon that I am continuing to pursue. While working with the skulls, performing scrying, I was using various colors and sounds. I placed the skull on a small light box and alternated several colors over the light source opening. After recording my sessions over a period of several weeks, I began a review of the results. I was shocked to learn that when I used a certain color over the light source it seemed to activate a time period. Researching my results further, I determined that each time I used the same color blue, for example, that I would revert to the same time frame. I could almost pick up where I left off at the end of the previous session that I used the particular color. The energy that these skulls produce is staggering. Are they indeed holding the knowledge of mankind? Were they left by an extraterrestrial intelligence? The ages of some of these skulls are estimated to be 100,000 years old. Without ancient documentation, psychometry may be the only tool that can be utilized to obtain the information. Our research continues daily.

In April of 1996, The BBC, in association with the British Museum and Everyman Productions, of London, performed tests on several crystal skulls to determine the age of the caning through electron microscope. Nick Nocerino was invited to bring Sha-Na-Ra. Carl and Jo Ann Parks were invited to bring Max. The British museum offered their Aztec skull and the Smithsonian Institution was invited to bring their 40-pound skull. Also included was a skull from Guatemala, an ancient gold and silver plated reliquary cross which rested in a carved crystal skull and a small skull. Anna Mitchell-Hedges was also invited. However, she declined.

A documentary was produced of the tests by the BBC. The results were shocking to the museum staff. It was determined that the British skull and the Smithsonian skull were not ancient, but in fact carved using very contemporary methods from the 1800s. Sha-Na-Ra and Max were also examined. While the officials of the museum would not publicly comment as to the results, it was confidentially revealed, by the antiquity expert brought to the museum by its officials, that the method used to carve Max and Sha-Na-Ra, was used more than 5000 years ago! The skull in the British museum was a fake. The Smithsonian skull was a fake. The Mitchell-Hedges skull? Well, we wonder why Anna declined. Her only comment was that it had been tested enough in the past. The BBC aired their documentary in July, 1996 and will be aired by U.S. television, however, no date has yet been set. In a letter to me from Everyman Productions, in London, it was reported by the BBC that they had never aired a program in this series with a larger audience.


The documentary produced as a result of the research project is titled Skull Trek: The Journey of the Crystal Skulls, and can be purchased from Pelton Publications as advertised in this issue of Atlantis Rising. Additional information about the crystal skulls can be obtained by writing F.R. Nick Nocerino, P. O. Box 302, Pinole, CA. 94564, Pelton Publications P. O. Box 377, Pinole, CA. 94564 or you can contact Carl and Jo Ann Parks, directly in Houston, Texas. Jo Ann travels extensively with Max. Her appearance schedule may be obtained from her or Pelton Publications. Joke van Dieten may be contacted directly in Miami Beach, Florida. She also is now traveling with E.T., Sha-Na-Ra, The Rainbow Skull and The Jaguar Man are not available for viewing, however, additional information regarding these artifacts can be obtained by contacting Mr. Nocerino or myself at Pelton Publications.

Source: Atlantis Rising, An Article In Issue Number 10 (Winter 97)



The Mysterious Crystal Skulls

© by Joshua Shapiro, The Crystal Skull Explorer
Reprinted with permission.

The purpose of this article is to provide a short concise description about the crystal skulls, one of the greatest mysteries in our world.
An Australian magazine originally had requested an article from me and I had to write in but a few days. So it was not an easy task by any means as the study about the crystal skulls is very involved and complex (to a degree). But, being an Aries born individual, I definitely accepted this challenge and I think the end results weren’t bad. So, now is our time to share this information with you!


© Joshua & Desy Shapiro

Joshua and Desy Shapiro (U.S. & Holland) holding their three personal crystal skulls, (from your left to right) “Portal de Luz”, “Unity”and “Moses of Peace”.

Who am I?

My name is Joshua Shapiro (American born in Chicago) and in April of 1983,
I was minding my own business when I walked into a metaphysical bookstore in San Jose, California and saw a picture of an almost human-sized Amethyst Crystal Skull. What was amazing is that when I gazed at this picture, I felt a strong and powerful vibration throughout my entire body and heard in my head the words, “What is this (the skull) doing out now?” Within an hour, while I was still in the same bookstore speaking to the owner, a powerful earthquake hit a city in California not far from us and the table with the pictures of this crystal skull was shaking as well. With an inner and outer confirmation, my journey with the crystal skulls had begun. Now almost 20 years later, having given over 200 presentations in the U.S., Canada, South America, Australia and all over Europe (10 different countries), boy do I have some important things to tell you about the crystal skulls!!

Next Question you may ask, “What is a Crystal Skull?”

Well as the name does imply, we are speaking about skull shaped objects made from various types of quartz crystals (clear, amethyst, smoky, rose, etc …).


© Joshua Shapiro photo by Vera Manaleo

“Portal de Luz” – a smoky quartz crystal skull created by a Master Brazilian Carver. Caretaker – Joshua Shapiro

There are three types discussed in the world today within the crystal skull community: “NEW or CONTEMPORARY” – crystal skulls being manufactured by modern carvers of which thousands upon thousands now exist (and this has only really started to explode since the middle part of the 1990’s). These skulls come in all shape and sizes (one new skull made was well over 100 pounds or 50 kilo) and are being primarily done by carvers in Brazil and China. Even being sold on E-Bay.

“OLD” – a crystal skull that was fashioned from over 100 years ago to about 1000 years ago. Most of these types of skulls have been discovered within or near ancient ruins in Mexico or Central America and many of them are guarded by descendants of various indigenous people throughout the world. Usually with the “Old” crystal skulls we can have find some type of tool mark left by the carver, as is the case with the “New” crystal skulls.

“ANCIENT” — a crystal skull that was created from 1500-2000 years ago to whenever (they could be hundreds of thousands of years old). There are a few crystal skulls that exist today which are considered “ANCIENT” crystal skulls.

However, there is absolutely no known technique we have that can date when a quartz crystal was fashioned. In general if we don’t find any tool marks this infers the skull was either done by hand or using some advance technology we don’t know about (Lasers [of which primitive tribes did not have], Thought Projection into the Ethers, a Gift from the Gods [ETs], made by an advance culture that existed on the earth long ago [Atlantis, Lemuria] or they may have come from some advance civilizations that live in the Inner Earth [the Hollow Earth theory,
a whole new article by itself].

It is my personal belief that the true understanding of the ancient crystal skulls can be found within various traditions of the indigenous cultures that exist in our world. In particular, there is a definite connection with the crystal skulls with the Mayans and the Aztecs, and there is even information coming from various Native American sources that they know about the skulls as well. In most cases, the crystal skulls are linked to sacred world prophecies held by these people.
Also if such cultures have their own crystal skulls (which seems very likely) they are protecting and guard these skulls in secret as they consider these artifacts very sacred and take the responsibility to hold them very seriously. To determine what type of crystal skull one might have, either we can go by the Legends of the Indigenous People who have them, or by working with trained sensitives who can psychically link into the energy and history of the skull.

History of the Crystal Skulls

The public first became aware of the crystal skulls during the later part of the 19th century. At this time, many museums of the world became interested in displaying antiquities from past civilizations (Egypt, Greece, Mesoamerica, etc …).
Thus, in the 1878, in the Musèe de l’homme (Museum of Man in Paris — for our French readers) and in 1898, in the Museum of Man of London (for our British readers), each had a clear quartz skull on display (both came out during the 1860’s during the French occupation of Mexico, purportedly found or acquired by Soldiers of Fortune, linked to Mayan sites in this country).
However, in the research conducted for our new book, “Journeys of a Crystal Skull Explorer” (to be released as an e-book and published book this year) there were a number of other old and ancient crystal skulls that were uncovered in various ways during this same century which eventually found their way (after passing through the hands of various people) to specific individuals who are publicly known today!

Again in the early part of the 20th century, usually connected with ancient Mesoamerican ruins or areas, more crystal skulls were uncovered:

  • “The Mitchell-Hedges Crystal Skull”: named after famed explorer and adventurer, F. A. Mitchell-Hedges, discovered in Lubaantum, an ancient Mayan city in Belize in 1924, human size, clear quartz, removable jaw, an almost exact duplicate of our own modern skull, now in the hands of Anna Mitchell-Hedges in Canada;
  • “ET”: discovered by a Mayan family near Guatemala while digging on their property in 1906; purchased by Joke Van Dieten in 1991 through a crystal store near Los Angeles, is the only human size ancient crystal skull made from smoky quartz which has a resemblance to an “ET” shape, this skull now travels the world and was shown at a major exhibition of Mysterious Objects in Vienna in 2001;
  • “Max”: 18 lb (9 kilo) clear quartz crystal skull purportedly discovered in a Mayan tomb in Guatemala between 1924-1926. The skull was gifted by a Mayan Shaman to a Tibet trained lama in 1970, used in a healing center in Houston, Texas and then upon the lama’s death, was given to Carl and JoAnn Parks, who tour with this crystal skull with many people in the U.S. primarily. The name comes from a telepathic communication between the skull and Mrs. Parks, where the skull informs this is the name.
  • “Ami”, the Amethyst Crystal Skull:
    Its history is unsure, purportedly it was part of a collection of crystal skulls held by the Mexican President Diaz from 1876-1910, but also we have reports the skull was discovered in the Oaxaca area (Mexico) and was hand down generation to generation through an order of Mayan Priests. Now it resides in San Jose, California with a group of businessmen who are offering this skull for sale.There are of course many other crystal skulls which are believed to be “ANCIENT” or very old, but this group of four is a good representation.

“Ami” – an ancient amethyst crystal skull. Notice the circular indentation in the temple and the white squiggly line that cuts the skull in half as it travels the full circumference of the quartz piece.


© Stan Chan & Al Ramirez

So, why are the Crystal Skulls so Important?

It would take a good book (like the one we are doing) to be able to answer this question, so I will just give a few ideas or thoughts for the readers:

  • “The ancient Crystal Skulls are the computers of the ancients, they contain important information that help humanity to pass through it current series of challenges to take us into a Golden Age.”
  • “They were a powerful tool for healing [Body Mind Spirit] by ancient civilizations such as the Mayans or the Atlanteans”
  • “Today, we have witnessed so many people’s lives profoundly affected when they have had an opportunity to be in the presence of an ‘ANCIENT’ crystal skull (healing of all types of illness, expansion of ones spiritual awareness, bringing to a head emotional or mental blocks, being a catalyst for a positive change in a person’s life and the list goes on) or even now, this phenomena is beginning to happen around the ‘NEW’ crystal skulls.”
Has Any Research Been Done to Understand the Skulls?

Yes indeed, there has been some interesting conducted by the Crystal Skull Society International in California, headed by crystal skull expert, F. R. “Nick” Nocerino for almost 60 years. Additionally, in 2001, a group of us formed the World Mystery Research Center (based in the U.S. and Holland) where we began to focus on two aspect related to the crystal skulls:

1. To use various electronic devices to see if we could provide some proof and understanding why the energy or presence of a crystal skull is affecting people in such a powerful manner (and our blind test showed us this was indeed occurring using such devices as meridian based machines, EEG, lecher antenna and Krilian machines sensitive to recording and displaying the Aura.

2. We also discovered secret codes contained within the crystal skulls in the form of images that came out using a special process of analysis using scanned images of the crystal skulls (reversal images that was developed by the Mayans) and very importantly, the Bible Code (secret information encoded within the Torah, the first five books of the Old Testament by a numerical skipping of letters) conclusively discusses the crystal skulls, their link to the Mayans, Prophecy, speaks about the Mitchell-Hedges Crystal Skull, their ability to work as a computer and for healing.

© Marc van de Velde

Here a group of researchers based in Belgium, using what is called a Lecher Antenna (like a dowsing rod but able to measure specific frequencies of energy) test “Portal de Luz”.
They were amazed to find that our crystal skull was broadcasting all the same frequencies as a human being: “The senses of ‘Sight’, ‘Smell’, ‘Taste’ and even ‘Hearing’ “

Final Comments from the Writer

I believe the crystal skulls are one of the most important ancient artifacts that have surfaced into the public’s attention which exist today.  I believe the crystal skulls hold key information that will to bring to our world a time of perfect peace and harmony by the year 2013 (or in the ‘Year Zero’, December 21st, 2012 as stated by the Mayans).  This special date is so significant that my new wife Desy and I married on December 21st, of last year, in the presence of our own crystal skulls and images of several ancient crystal skulls, 10 years before.

Regardless of the sources from which these skulls originated from (other worlds brought here by the ETs, Atlantis, Lemuria, the Inner Earth, etc …) they are now helping many people to awaken to their true potential and to see that we are all members of the same spiritual family who must unite together and work in a cooperative manner to create a world of peace and harmony for ourselves and the generations to come.  The Crystal Skulls are a sign from the Universe and unseen spiritual helpers; that this time of Peace that has been prophesized is now here and at hand, if we each could but do what only makes our hearts sing.

Thank you for reading and listening. Hopefully in the near future, Desy and I will be able to personally meet with you to share the energies of the crystal skulls as we continue our personal journey and odyssey all over the world, guided by the presence linked to these special crystalline friends.
In Peace and Light always,

Joshua & Desy Shapiro,
The Crystal Skull Explorers

NOTE: Read the updated version of this article:
http://www.v-j-enterprises.com/CrystalSkullsbyJoshua204.html

Electric Lights in Egypt?

by Frank Dörnenburg

It is a widespread belief in alternative science that our forefathers possessed a much greater technological knowledge than our schoolbook science is willing to accept. Many of those theories are lacking serious foundation and are often based on overdrawn speculations [ like the Manna machine ].

The Lamp

In the temple of Hathor at Dendera, several dozens of kilometers
north of Luxor, there are reliefs interpreted by some “experts” as lamps.

But the theory that electricity was known and used in antiquity seems to rest on a much more stable foundation. The key to the whole theory lies a few hundred kilometers east of Egypt, in today’s Iraq. There some strange pots were found. Some contained watertight copper cylinders, glued into the opening with asphalt. In the middle of the cylinder was an iron rod, held in place also with asphalt. The excavator who found the first of these pots in 1936 was sure: this is a galvanic element, a primitive battery. Reconstructions did indeed show that it was possible to create electricity with it.

Another key element for the electro-thesis is actually something that is missing.
It’s a riddle where schoolbook science is capitulating. Soot. In none of the many thousands of subterranean tombs and pyramid shafts was found a single trace of soot, as we are told by the authors of the electro-thesis, although many of these tombs are full of often colourful paintings. But the primitive light sources the Egyptians knew (candles, oil lamps etc.) are always leaving soot and are using oxygen. So how DID the Egyptians get their light? Some rationalists are arguing with mirrors, but the quality of the copper plates the Egyptians used as mirrors were not good enough for that.

Tempel
Temple of Hathor in Dendera

In this temple in Dendera, several dozens of kilometers north of Luxor, some experts found the light. A Norwegian electrical engineer noticed that the object shown on the relief on top of this page could work as a lamp. An Austrian colleague was able to construct a working model, and two well known authors in the AAS, Peter Krassa and Rainer Habeck, could even work out a real theory based on it. What we see is without question a form of bulb, with two arms reaching into it near its thick end, and a sort of cable at the other end, from where a snake is leaping out to touch the arms on the other side. The whole ensemble really looks like a lamp.

Lamp 1

Another picture from the crypts of Dendera:
Eastern relief on south wall

Is this the proof? Did the Egyptians know and use electric lights? If so, where did they get the principle from? Was it from their own invention, or did they have help?


Soot and Lamps

Before I go into the details of Dendera, I will examine some of the circumstantial evidence. That’s because some points several authors use to prepare the “light mystery” are in contrast to what I have seen personally. Here are two of many quotes:

“Krassa and Habeck are telling us, that torches, oil lamps or candles are emitting soot on a large scale, which must be detecteable on walls and ceilings. But that is not the case.”[ 1 ]

or

“In the Roman and Greek world torches and oil lamps were used to light the buildings. Wherever places are left where such devices were positioned, we can find traces of soot on the walls and ceilings. But in ancient Egypt … we can find these combustion traces nowhere.”[ 2 ]

Well, I have been in Egypt several times now, and I never had a problem to detect soot in pyramids and tombs. As an example here the soot covered burial chamber walls of the Red Pyramid of Dahschur:

Soot in Red Pyramid
Soot in burial chamber

This chamber is completely above ground, built by Snofru, father of the builder of the Great Pyramid, Khufu. The soot seems to be millimeters thick, and if one goes through the pyramid passages in Egypt a look at the ceiling is enough to find soot in abundance.

The oldest comment known to me about soot in the Great Pyramid is from John Greaves, in a book from 1638!![ 3 ]

The passages and chambers in Egyptian pyramids were built with a few exceptions in open ditches like the example of Abu Roasch below. A large dugout was furnished with several layers of floor- and wall blocks, the sarcophagus was lowered into the open chamber, ornamented wall parts, finished outside, were lifted down and put in place, the roof was positioned, and then the ditch was refilled. The whole construction process took place in broad daylight.

Ausschachtung Abu Roasch Ausschachtung Abu Roasch

Abu Roasch – Trench for burial chamber

The great chambers of the red pyramid, and the passages in the great Pyramid, also were built in full daylight. The whole time, until the last ceiling block was positioned years after the chamber was begun, all tasks like polishing and furnishing the walls and roof beams could be done in daylight. Why should there be soot in such constructions? In the pyramid age only very few construction projects needed artificial light, like the Djoser-labyrinth and the underground passage and chamber in Khufu’s pyramid.

It’s the same with the decorated chambers of the pyramids of the 5th and 6th dynasty. All decorations could be put to the wall blocks in broad daylight which were then covered afterwards. Even most of the private mastaba tombs could be finished with no artificial light. So missing soot in all these constructions would be no mystery at all.

Well, but what IS funny: In all these buildings which did not need any artificial lighting, soot can be found. Even the walls of the crypts where those supposed light bulb reliefs were found are covered with soot, as this picture shows::

Soot on Dendera-Relief

Dendera – Soot on lamp relief

The original white color of the lime stone can be seen on the edges of the re-set block…

The book quotes from above have now been falsified twice. For one, many of the passages needed no artificial lighting, and second they also contain lots of soot.

The source of the soot is pretty clear: almost all buildings have been opened in antiquity and were tourist attractions through the centuries, even millenia. For example: Greek writings were found in the subterran chamber of the Great Pyramid.

There were thousands of visitors in them, and every single one of them, until the beginning of the 20th century, had to use oil lamps, candles or open flame torches to get light. And all those people spent a much larger amount of time in those buildings than the original builders.

Preliminary evaluation

One of the major foundational arguments for the lamp idea has disappeared. We now see that that the “no soot” argument is definitively untrue, as even buildings which did not need light during construction time have soot in them. A bad situation which can even get worse… Let’s take a look at

Smoking lamps

This was my first lesson in how slow riddles are dying in alternative science. Because the first time I discussed this topic was even before I had connection to Usenet: in 1989!

I hadn’t written anything critical about Dendera or even Daeniken yet – that was still five years in the future. But Daenikens new book “In den Augen der Sphinx” had just been published, and the passage I quoted on top of the page was discussed in one group of the so called “Maus-Netz”.

Well, if Daeniken was right, then all churches, houses and palaces before the invention of electric light must have been soot holes, because they all had candles or oil lamps as primary light sources. I hadn’t noticed that, so there was a chance, that Daeniken was wrong. So I concluded that an experiment was necessary here.

I took an ash tray, filled it with olive oil, formed a wick out of cotton wool, and soaked it with oil. Then I put the wick onto the side of the bowl so that it stuck out about 5 mm over the rim. I lit it – and it produced a steady, smokeless flame. Only an extremely long wick lead to an emission of soot.

I put a white dish over the flame, about 50 cm high, but I was unable to detect any trace of soot even after a long time. And it was nice to find out after some years that even experts like the famous material experts Clarke/Engelbach shared my opinion:

“Many visitors to the monuments express surprise that the painting could have been carried out in the darkness of the tombs and in the dim light of the temples. The Egyptian lamp was of the simplest type, merely a wick floating in oil. It is not infrequently represented in the scenes in the tombs, where it usually takes the form of an open receptacle mounted on a tall foot which, in the smaller examples, can be grasped in the hand. In the pictures, there arise from the receptacle what we may assume to be wicks or flames, always curved over the top as if blown by a current of air. Stand lamps in limestone have been found in the pyramid of El-Lahun, and representations of them in stone in the ‘Labrinth’ at Hawara. In Egyptian houses, small dishes were also used as lamps. They usually have their rims pinched into a spout …

The absence of smoke-blackening in the tombs of the kings is also no difficult explanation. If olive-oil is used, there is very little smoke, and a suitable covering over the lamp, for which various methods readily suggest themselves, would very easily prevent carbon being deposited on the ceiling.”[ 4 ]

And even from the region where artificial light was most necessary we have notes from the Egyptians themselves: The many 100 m long tombs in the Valley of the Kings were definitively lighted with oil lamps and wicks, since we have protocols about wicks and lamps handed out to the workers each day from the Valley of the Kings – where it was carefully documented how many wicks of what length, and how much oil was given to each worker – there is no mystery at all how these tombs were illuminated. There is no place for pharaonic flash lights.[ 5 ]

After I posted my results to the “Maus” I made first contact with the wide spread unwillingness in alternative science to accept unpleasant results. “Bullsh*t”, “nonsense”, “I don’t believe you”, were the comments to my sootless lamps. I wrote back “People, you mustn’t believe me, just try it out for yourselves.”. Again I drew a blank: “I don’t need to try it out, I know what happens and it’s not what you are posting here” was the only reaction.

Yes, and THAT is precisely the reason why the “mystery of the soot” is still part of every new publication and of at least one “mystery park”….

Conclusion:

Well, as Mr. Spock would say. “Fascinating”. None of the premises of the soot fans are correct. There is soot, although the Egyptian lamps were almost sootless and even buildings in no need of artificial illumination contain soot. This whole argument is as wrong as an argument can be. But just because we are sure that the soot comes from non-Egyptian sources it is still no evidence that can be used to propose alternative lighting methods.

BTW: It is possible to reduce soot from oil lamps by putting salt into the oil. I didn’t try it out because I couldn’t get soot even without salt in the oil…

Remarks:

[1]
Däniken, Erich von; Die Augen der Sphinx, Ullstein 1989, P. 215

[2]
Ercivan, Erdogan; Das Sternentor der Pyramiden, Bettendorf 1997, P. 83

[3]
explained in in: Lauer, Jean-Phillipe; Das Geheimnis der Pyramiden, Herbig 1980, P. 37 f

[4]
Clarke, Somers & Engelbach, Reginald; Ancient Egyptian Masonry, London 1930, P. 201

[5]
Brunner-Traut, Emma; Alltag unter Pharaonen, Herder 1998, P. 245


Energy Sources

There are more critical points about the lamp theory aside from the false argument of the missing soot. Another one: Where could have the Egyptians taken electricity from? For more than 200 years now systematic diggings took place in Egypt, and no electrical generators could be found. The only objects at all found from antique times which could produce some electricity are the famous

Baghdad-Batteries

These small pots which were found in the proximity of today’s Baghdad are the best candidates for electro-chemical devices found so far [ Baghdad  Battery ].
The oldest were found in a Parthi settlement, which was inhabited around the time of Christ’s birth. The discovery site – a presumed hill which coincidentally was found to be an ancient village in 1936 – suggests even a later settling. The other pots even might have to be settled into the period to 1200 CE. From this, any usage of such devices in ancient Egypt seems to be very improbable.

Right from the beginning the chief excavator Wilhelm Koenig had the opinion that these pots had been batteries used for galvanizing items. Some finds and writings led to the belief that the Parthians knew a method of coating copper or silver with gold by using gold cyanide – without the use of electricity. With a reconstruction of the supposed battery the galvanizing rate could be quadrupled.

Such devices were unly useable once. If they were used in large numbers in daily life, remnants of them must have been found somewhere. This is known to the propagists of this idea, too, so they strip down the usage of electric light to “sacral purposes only”. The situation gets scizophrenic here: On one hand the author show a problem (soot) which only could be solvend (in their opinion) by massive use of electric lighting, on the other hand they reduce their theory to a small scale sacral use themselves. Their own theory therefore can not solve the problem created to initiate the idea!

Battery = Energy?

There are surely differences between an accelerated galvanizing technique and lighting a light bulb. In the first case small amperages and voltages are enough to do the job, but not in the second case. Even a small torch bulb needs about one Watt to shed a dim light.

The performance of a battery is the product of voltage and amperage (volt times ampere). The voltage is a material constant between different metals. If we place two different metals in acid we can measure an electric difference measured i Volts.. This difference is independent from the size of the plates, it only depends on the materials used. The difference between two plates of the same material is null. Therefore you can sort the various metals into an electro-chemical row with the most negative elements (giving up electrons) to the left and the most positive ones (collecting electrons) to the right. This principle is known to us for approximately 200 years, and the best combinations for metals are known almost as long.

The “batteries” found in Baghdad however are quite poor in comparison. Some contained only same metals (copper rods in copper cylinders) and can produce therefore no voltage at all. And those few who could contains the metal pairing copper/iron which are only 0.5 volts apart on the electro-chemical scale. This excludes any systematic research of the phenomenon which would be the basis for the development of a lamp.

The second factor for a battery was solved nearly as inefficient than the first.
The amperage depends on the surface of the used electrodes. An ideal battery possesses two electrodes with surfaces as large as possible, with materials lying apart as far as possible on the electro-chemical scale. For example disk batteries like the famous Volta pile, which consisted of copper and zinc plates. Or our zinc coal batteries, whose central electrode is an activated charcoal staff with an active surface as large as several football fields. The relics of Baghdad are there poor, too, they came with single rods of iron with a minimal surface as counter electrode. This is another sign against a systematic research of electricity.

Battery = Light?

In 1995 I made a reconstruction of a Baghdad-type battery myself. My first try was a disaster: The reaction stopped after a few minutes. After some research I found the reason: Such natural acids which could have been used (I used vinegar) need air to react. Therefore the closed original constructions never could have worked as batteries!

After I drilled several holes into the cylinder it produced about 0.4-0.5 volts with open contacts, and had a short circuit amperage of 50 mA. The electrical “performance” adds up to 25 milli Watts without connected devices (which breaks down to 1/10th with a single bulb attached).

That means however, that for the operation of only one 1 watt-bulb the ridiculous quantity of forty batteries is needed! Since each battery weighs approximately 2 kilograms, the Egyptian flashlight without rack and wiring would weigh around 80 kilograms!

Oh, after approximately 8 hours power output the inside of the battery decomposes into a green, poisonous mud which must be disposed of.

And the soldering on the bottom gave way, too, so that the whole mess fell into the cylinder I had placed below the metal cylinder.

For the lighting of the building sites with batteries this means:

  • One 1 Watt bulb needs 40 batteries per working day.
  • A worker needs a lamp
  • 10 workers were digging out each site
  • Each excavation took two years (veeeery carefully estimated)
  • => each system needed 292000 (!) batteries!
  • Total weight: 584 tons!
  • there are 400 large underground sites in Egypt
  • => 116 million batteries were necessary
  • ==> With a total weight of 233600 tons!
  • All these batteries would have to lie around somewhere as scrap iron or waste. The find situation for batteries in Egypt is however ZERO!

There is just another minor item always “forgotten” by the proponents of ancient batteries: The iron. Iron was a rare and precious metal in Egypt, because no ore is found there. The next iron ore deposits are in today’s Turkey, and were in firm possession of the Hethites, which had a monopoly in manufacturing iron goods from around 1600 B.C. But each “battery” needed a central iron rod as main electrode. So it’s simply impossible that a metal first used in 1600 b.C. played a major role in lighting pyramids built more than 1000 years before! Each battery contained about 150 grams of iron, so for the whole 400 big graves about
17,400 tons
of this metal more precious than gold was needed.

From these numbers it can easily be derived that the operation of electrical lamps with the so-called Baghdad batteries was simply impossible. But no other antique energy sources are known, so that any lamp faces the problem of a missing power source.

In the television broadcast “Aliens – do they return?” by Erich von Daeniken, already addressed by me in the pyramid section, he tried to make a connection between Baghdad batteries and light in his typical way. He tried to suggest that a gas-discharge lamp could be powered with such a battery. So he connects a digital multi meter to the battery – a loud buzzing noise suggests a high voltage. Then we can read a not defined voltage of “0293” on the meter; afterwards he presents a “reconstruction” of a Dendera-type gas discharge lamp also connected with a meter, and gives the impression that both voltages are of the same amount!

Other energy sources?

“If the Egyptians already knew batteries, then different generators will probably have been known” is a merry, but absurd or missing way of proving a theory.

When Volta experimented with its (by the way 10000 times more efficient) batteries, he lived in the age of the research and progress. Each detail, each improvement was published and hundreds of scientists around the whole globe were busy with the study of nature and exchanged their results in innumerable publications. Nevertheless it lasted nearly 200 years until the induction was discovered, and out of this in the end the generator was developed. This needed an unbelievable number of small steps, and each of these can be reconstructed from uncounted publications.

From the Parthic, Babylonic or Egyptian region however no evidence for a systematic study of physics or chemistry, which is a mandatory prerequisite for the development of such technique is known. But without this knowledge no genius amateur handicraftsman can “by coincidence” invent something like a generator. This conclusion is therefore just as soundly as the reason chain “They had wheels, therefore they knew a combustion engine”.

As long as no find for the development of such a technology is made, we must exclude it. Even when Krassa/Habeck declare the Djed pillar surprisingly, after defining it in the first half of their book as “electrical insulator”, as a generator, which produces electricity with “hot air and dust”…

Related link: Baghdad  Battery


TECHNICAL ISSUES
The “Lamp”

After two pieces of circumstantial evidence have been eliminated we should now take a closer look at the objects themselves. I will start “technical”, since the authors of the thesis asked for it. On the following pages I will show what Egyptology says about the pictures.
I must start with some words of warning. The book “Lights of the Pharaohs” by the Austrian authors Krassa & Habeck (they wrote the most popular summary of the thesis, and I base my discussion on it) is nicely written and sounds logically sound. After reading of the book a laymen might ask himself, why Egyptology publishes such a rubbish about Egyptian history, since it seems to be completely different. But anyone with just a slight knowledge about Egyptian history sees at once, what a load of rubbish is poured onto the trusting reader. Most parts of the “history” the authors unfold are free inventions, therefore I cannot discuss those parts of the book – I simply have neither web space nor the time to correct everything they have twisted. I will stick therefore strictly to the objects and the technical and Egyptological discussions about them. Only some examples of Krassa/Habecks weird history will be discussed on an additional page at the end of this article.
So let us see how the representatives of the electro thesis interpret the famous Dendera picture.[1] Krassa/Habeck are giving the following explanations (which I will correct on the following pages 🙂 ):[2]

Lamp elements

  1. Priest
  2. ionised fumes
  3. electric discharge (snake)
  4. Lamp socket (Lotos)
  5. Cable (Lotos stem)
  6. Air god
  7. Isolator (Djed-Pillar)
  8. Light bringer Thot with knifes
  9. Symbol for “current”
  10. Inverse polarity (Haarpolarität +)
  11. Energy storage (electrostatic Generator?)

On the basis of this picture engineer W. Garn constructed a working device which indeed gave some light. In the book of Krassa/Habeck we find he following sketch and description:

Zeichnung Garn-Birne

“If we evacuate a glass bulb with two metal parts reaching into it (B), (C), we can see a discharge at much lower levels, depending on the size of the glass balloon (D). At a pressure of about 40 t (tonnes) (40 mm of mercury) a snakelike light filament meanders from one metal part to the other (E). If we evacuate further, the light filament grows wider until it fills the whole glass balloon. This is exactly what we see in on the pictures in the subterranean chambers of the Hathor sanctuary.”[3]

This is the basis of the technical interpretation. Sounds logical, sounds comprehensible – and doesn’t work!

How so often in “fringe science” this lamp idea only “works” by omission of important details. You might have noticed that I emphasized the word “two” in Garns comment. Why? Because “two” is the key word. Every “normal” lamp needstwo electrodes to produce light, a simple light bulb or the Garn-construction.

“Well, and where is the problem?” you might ask. Simple. The problem is, that the “working” lamp picture in Dendera is only one of six. And from all six pictures this is the ONLY one where something reaches “into” the “bulb”!

The pictures of the objects can be seen three times in the subterranean crypts and three times in an associated “cult room” I will discuss later. The “working” lamp is once shown in the crypt. Three times pictures like this, with the air god Heh carrying the “lamp” are shown (one in the crypt, two in the cult room):

Heh

and two times this way with a djed pillar outside of the “lamp” (once in the crypt and once in the cult room):

Djed außen

These objects could never had been lamps. Neither a Garn-type nor a “normal” light bulb. But it gets even worse, because there are pictures of similar objects in the chapels around the temple. Without Djed, lotus or generator:

Snake stone

Dendera – Snake Stella

This is a picture with so-called snake stones. Krassa and Habeck are making fun about them, as “silly explanations of Egyptologists” – therefore I will discuss their meaning on the Egyptological pages.
Fact is, that the “lamp explanation” works only for one of six large pictures, and for none of the uncountable snake stones in this temple and in all of Egypt.

The only possible (and really used) explanation was: “The Egyptians saw the whole thing just a short moment, so they couldn’t remember how the thing really looked like”. But you must admit that this is silly. As you remember: the core of the lamp-story is, that the Egyptians used those things centuries, even millennia, to routinely light out their pyramids and tombs. And yet they could not remember how their daily tool looked like?
Even the “reduced model” (which also contradicts the initial no-soot-“evidence”), that only priests hat this magical instrument and showed it a few times a year to the astonished masses, fails, because they had to have the objects at hand and could have copied them. If we take in account that the “working” model is dramatically outnumbered by the non-working types we can only conclude that the idea is, from the scientific viewpoint, flawed. In science an idea is only interesting if it can at least everything other ideas can explain, and it is really interesting if it can explain some things even better.
The lamp model can not even explain five of the six large pictures, not to mention the hundreds of small snake stones. Funny: “school science” has no problems to explain them…

But there are more problems demolishing even the basic idea that those things could be light bulbs of any kind. Krassa/Habeck seem to believe that the objects on the pictures are shown in their natural proportions with regard to the “priest” behind the lamp (although they are wondering, that some other people are shown smaller than the priest).[4] If we use the priest as scale, the objects on the relief must be around 2.5 m long with a largest diameter of one meter, and a smallest diameter of 50 centimeter!
Regardless of the construction used, the bulb had to have a near vacuum inside – can you imagine the air pressure resting on such a device?
Well, we don’t need to guess, we can calculate it. With a length of 2,5 meters, a largest thickness of one meter and a smallest thickness of 50 centimeters we can calculate the volume roughly as a truncated cone of approximately 2 m length ( Volume = Pi * h /3 * (r12 + r1 * r2 + r22) and a hemisphere of one meter diameter (Volume 2/3 Pi r3). The combined volume is around 1,12 cubic meters, the surface of the object amounts to approximately 6,3 square meters.
If the object is evacuated, a pressure of about 63 t (tonnes) would rest on a Dendera object. To withstand such an immense pressure, the object would have to be quite thick-walled, at least two to three centimeters thick. The weight of this bulb would be then approximately 750 kilograms. And this monster would be nevertheless a ticking time bomb: a small crack in the glass by uneven cooling with the manufacturing, and the Dendera lamp implodes with the force of a bomb. The fragmentation effect might be deadly in the periphery of several meters!
I for my case also know of no vacuum glass bulb of similar format from modern manufacturing, and this might have its reasons. We cannot do it – but the Egyptians could? Although they had no technical industry at all? Err – no.
“Rubbish” one lamp-fan told me, who dropped the Garn idea in a millisecond to defend the general idea (the people in fringe science are very flexible in switching even basic assumptions to keep a “mystery” alive). I was told, that the bulb could have been filled with a noble gas.
Sure, noble gas grows on date palms 🙂 Without a real industrial technology it is impossible to get those gasses. There is no trace of a technology needed to extract them before the 20th century. Also: the Dendera lamp would have to contain enough gas to fill at least 713000 (!!!) halogen lamps with a lighting performance of together 14 million Watts (at one bar filling pressure)!!! And twice may be guessed what lights up more brightly.
In both cases the Dendera construction is characterized primarily by its uselessness. A simple bulb or a 500 W halogen lamp needs fewer resources, is simpler and safer against production defects as such a monster. It has its reasons why we use today small bulbs and no Dendera giant, even 100something years after Edison.

Oh, I forgot the glass bulbs. Glass is for us a daily-life article, but the situation in ancient times was different. That’s why we come at last to a major problem of alternative history: the event horizon. Material expert Paul Nicholson writes in the current standard book about Egyptian materials and manufacturing techniques:

Antikes ägyptisches Glas gehört zum besten der antiken Welt. Trotz seiner technischen Ausgereiftheit ist sein Ursprung und seine Fertigungstechnik noch unvollkommen verstanden. Lucas (1962:179) bemerkt, daß, obwohl Glas sporadisch vor der 18. Dynastie (ca. 1550 BC) auftauchte, dies wohl eher ein glückliches Nebenprodukt von Unfällen bei der Fayence-Fertigung war, während spätere Herstellungen eindeutig geplant gewesen sind. … Von 1500 BC an taucht Glas als reguläres Produkt mit hohem Prestige in Ägypten auf.”[5]

So glass became a prestigious high price product around 1500 BCE – more than 1000 years after the great pyramids were built.
If we add al these facts the air becomes very thin for the lamp thesis – evacuated, to say. 🙂

Let’s have a look at some negligibilities I noticed along the way. Krassa/Habeck are enraged (like many of their colleagues) by the interpretation of things as “symbolic” in scientific publications. Disgusting. Paleo-SETI is much more straight forward, they need no symbolic hogwash to explain things. Well, aside, of course, of the symbols Krassa/Habeck also need to explain their construction!
Yes, they need symbols too. The snake for example. The Garn-lamp has either a light aura around the arms or the light fills out the whole bulb. A snake as continuous effect does not exist. So the snake suddenly becomes a symbol for the electric current! But it even gets better: not only the snake, but all of the objects on the relief suddenly become symbols – the only way the authors can interpret away unsuitable “details”.
The two facing persons below the bulb are transforming to a “symbol for alternating current”, the woman before them becomes a “symbol for electric current”, the ape with the two knifes (identified only a few pages earlier correctly as protection god Upu[6], but with a crazy interpretation) mutates within a few pages later[7] from a &”symbol for high voltage” to “Thot, bringer of light” – a “symbol for light”. That’s really funny, because Egyptology needs fewer symbols to explain the whole scenery, as I will show on the following pages.
The lamp idea fails again since it needs not less but more symbols. So what about the disgust for symbols? Are some more equal than others?

The next argument was, as expected, the famous “looks-like”-argument of fringe science. As long as there is no other plausible explanation, so the consensus on the former A.A.S. discussion board, there is no reason to see something else in those objects. Because the Dendera objects look so much like our modern lamps that other interpretations simply make no sense.

Birne 1 Leuchtstoff Spot Halogen

Strangely. In the pictures above you see a set of current and older lamp constructions. Halogen bulbs, Spot lights, fluorescent tubes – and none of them has even the smallest resemblance to the Dendera construction. Even the sodium high-pressure lamp on the right, although a little similar on first look, is completely different in size, structure and mode of operation to its Dendera counter piece. Particularly I miss the so eminent important arms reaching into the lamps. So dear reader, if you know of any lamp in technical use now or in the past – please, send me a picture. Unless then I see no reason to interpret the Dendera reliefs as lamps.

By the way: we often hear about “reconstructions” of ancient “artefacts”, but those normally don’t deserve that word. Like here those are in reality constructions designed in a way, that they look like parts on ancient reliefs or fit more or less badly written descriptions. Other objects are for example the Maya motor or the Hesekiel shuttle from Blumrich [ Ezechiel , Ancient Astronauts Theory ]. A lamp construction that looks like Dendera is possible but makes no sense. It has its reasons why we use small bulbs and not 2.5 m Dendera monsters.

The time scale

Let us now take a look at Dendera and it’s connection to Pharaonic Egypt. To support an influence of the Dendera-“technology” on ancient Egypt the temple must be old. And, so the authors Krassa/Habeck in their book, the temple IS old. Not only old, but prehistoric, too. Well, that’s it, then?

No, not really, the authors are telling only half the truth. It is true that the location of the temple was used since old times, at least back to Khufu’s reign.
But this temple was torn down completely after Alexander the Great conquered Egypt in 332 BCE:

“Remnants of the former temples are … not known, because all earlier structures were torn down in the later Ptolemaic epoch to make room for the new, today visible temple.” [ 8 ]

OK, but the reliefs could be older. They are located in underground chambers, maybe the weren’t removed? No. The reliefs are worked in high relief which cannot be altered afterwards. And on the reliefs we can find the name of the builder of the temple. Krassa/Habeck were, as we can read in their book, about 4 hours inside the rooms and photographed any square centimeter of the reliefs and inscriptions[9]. So they must have stumbled over the “visiting card” of the owner, its name cartouche. It can even be seen in their book on table 24: Ptolemeius XII. And he lived – around 50 BCE! That was it with prehistoric. If one looks up what Thomas Schneider has written in his Lexikon der Pharaonen (Dictionary of the Pharaohs) about Ptolemeius XII, we find:

“The outstanding event of the building and religion policy P.s ‘ XII. is the inauguration of the Edfu temple on 7 February 70. In Dendera he begun in the year 54 B.C. with the construction work of the Hathor temple……”[10]

Still any questions? The temple was built in an era long after the end of dynastic Egypt, about 300 years after the reign of the last Egyptian pharaoh. And: no temple before Dendera shows symbols like these. There is no connection between these symbols and Pharaonic Egypt. Whatever they are: the whole idea of electricity in ancient Egypt has died with this building date.

Remarks:

[1]
The numbers are equal to the ones in the sketch in Krassa/Habeck;
Das Licht der Pharaonen, Herbig 1992, p. 231

[2]
ibd.

[3]
ibd. p. 239, emphasize by me

[4]
ibd. p. 97

[5]
Nicholson/Shaw (Hrsg.), Ancient Egyptian Materials and Technology, Cambridge University Press 2000, p. 195

[6]
Krassa/Habeck p. 213

[7]
ibd. p. 231

[8]
Arnold, Dieter; Die Tempel Ägyptens, Artemis 1992, p. 165 ff

[9]
Krassa, Habeck p. 100 & 106

[10]
Schneider, Thomas; Lexikon der Pharaonen, Artemis 1994, p. 224 f


Egyptologic issues

The technical interpretation of the Dendera objects on the last page left open some unanswered questions. So let’s look now what Egyptology has to say about these reliefs. Would you be astonished if I say that these are pictures of “cult objects”?

“Cult” is a definitive bad word in alternative archaeology, because in the opinion of many alternative authors “cult” is always used by school science when they cannot explain the real meaning of an object. But ancient man, so they argue, was much more intelligent than school science accepts, and had no need for useless cults (althogh this opens a new dilemma: on one hand our ancestors were too intelligent for cults, on the other hand they were too stupid to stack more than two stones without the help of “gods”).

The main point of cult-oppositionists is: If there IS no cult, we can interpret these objects technically with the “looks like…” method. And the answer to why there were no cults is the rethoric counter-question: “Were the people in ancient times not as least as intelligent as modern day people? Why should they have more cults than we? And we intelligent people from today HAVE no cults.”
Well, they can’t be serious with the “cultless modern time”. There are some buildings called “churches” around, which can be seen as “cult centres”. Yes, there are cults celebrated there (communions, christenings, church service…) connected with cult objects (crosses, tabernacles, altars).

And then there are temples, mosques and synagogues from many different religions around the world, and many 100 mio. people celebrating the dedicated cults in these cult centres – inside and outside at home.

“Yeah, but that’s all”, said a cultless-fan in a discussion.

Yes, all. Aside from all those sects and other cults around, which are more and more favoured in our cultless western society. Crystal healing, UFO cults like Raelians, earth powers, Feng Schui, horoscopes, ghosts and the full spectre of esoteric believs…

Yes, we are really enlightened and cultless

Oh, and from the reaction of some “cultless” fans an adventure park in the Swiss alps is already regarded as centre of a new cult…

So when we today have several 100 million (or even some billion) of cultists around we can assume, that cults in ancient times played at least the same role as they do today. And I ask myself, how cultless-fans would interpret remains of our cult buildings. Church towers and minarets as “lost memory of space ships”? Oops, I forgot that this is even today paqrt of some alternative theses…

Plan
Here we meet him again, our old friend, the context. The way some authors work – pulling some details out of the context and molding them together to create a new reality – will produce spectacular results, but no reliable ones. The same here. Egyptian reliefs have the characteristic not to be located simply connectionless in the area. We find them usually in temples or graves. Unlike our “general-purpose churches” Egyptian temples normally served special purposes. If the Dendera temple served a light God, or perhaps even a “unknown instructor from the stars” for example – well, this would be a good sign.

Unfortunately, the temple serves no star god. The Dendera temple and its crypt, in which the mysterious figures are, serves exclusive one purpose: The yearly cycle of the sun, the New Year and its celebrations. The complete temple is dedicated to this topic. The crypt had also a practical function: It served to keep of the statues shown on the reliefs for the celebrations, which were gotten out to the ceremonies. The texts in the crypts, which are translated although some authors state otherwise, leave to it no doubt (e.g. ” hidden place of the smn pictures “). In the texts can be found which purpose what statue had, how big they were, what materials they consisted of and what was done with them during New Year’s Eve. So what have lamps have to do with New Year’s Eve?

The meaning of the reliefs

The text, which belongs to the relief, explains all its parts showing only the new year topics shown above. The main theme is the sun having its last day in the old year and its first morning in the new year. We can read this clearly enough: “Resomtus alive with gloss in the sky (and) lives at the day of the New Year celebration”. That is in a way the heading of the whole scene.

The oval which contains the snake is according to some authors a light bulb and the snake a light filament. Apart from the fact that snakes in Egypt never represented “light” (and that I know of no lighting snakes) the oval had in Egypt a define meaning: It was a symbol of the morning sky, in ancient Egypt “Duat”!
The snake represents, as in many other pictures, the god of the morning sun, Harsomtus. But why, say the skeptics, should a snake be a symbol of the morning sun? Quite simple. The Egyptians noticed that snakes shed their hide and were believed to renew with each shedding. Almost as the morning sun, which comes up every morning renewed. And the sun moves like the snake without visible outer organs.
Especially in Greek-Roman times from 300 B.C. on Harsomtus is always depicted as snake. Therefore Harsomtus appears in Dendera in all cases as newborn sun, and not as a filament – it would be widely out of the context.

The Djed pillar

A substantial point in the light bulb argumentation is the Djed column. Since it is not exactly known what it represents, it is assumed to be an electrical insulator by some authors of the paleo SETI faction and integrated into the light bulb thesis. However, as we already saw in the technical section, the “lamp” is depicted in three different forms. One in its “functioning” form with the arms from the Djed pillar inside the “bulb”. Twice however in completely ‘un-isolatoric’ 🙂 manner: Once completely without the Djed pillar – embarrassingly, if it should be a so important item for the lamp case, and once with the “glass bulb” itself resting on the Djed pillar with the arms outside the bulb. In this case the Djed pillar cannot have been an insulator – because glass itself is one of the best insulators known.

What is correct is that we do not know the origin of the Djed form. It could have been many different things. But the hieroglyphic, the sign which used the Djed pillar as a word, was used exclusively for the word “lasting” or “stability” – at all times of the 3500 year long history. The occasional use of the symbol as “support of the sky” supports this meaning additionally. In the bulb representation the Djed supports the morning sky, which corresponds accurately with the conventions. So we can translate “Djed” in many cases just directly with “column”.

This quite crucial point is not at all registered by the proponents of the lamp thesis. Why – whether from unawareness or because it can destroy some beloved theory – is unknown to me. But in the texts to the lamp reliefs and in the pictures there is no other meaning for Djed than “lasting”, as the writings unmistakably prove. Until today no attempt was made to state why in this representation does not to apply in these pictures.

Further relief elements

The “light bulb” of Dendera has on the foot something like a socket, into which a “cable” runs, which is connected on the other side with a “generator”. This is the description we can read in the more fantastic literature. But the cable is no cable. It is, as we can read directly in the texts describing the scene, a symbolic sun barge, a boat in which the sun floated across the sky. All this is written in the texts beside the objects.
Neither is the form of the barge shown in Dendera unusual. In many symbolic barge representations the boat only consists of a string like object which forms a bow and a stern. And on the horizontal platform between we find normally gods and objects connected with the sun or the sunrise. One of these objects connected with the sun barge, and normally located at its stern, is the lotus flower. This can be seen in Dendera, too. It’s the so called “lamp socket”!!
The ancient Egyptians believed that the sun originally came out of the first hill coming out of the flood of creation (the crypts in Dendera were accurately under this place, so was believed). One version of this was that the sun child (usually Nefertem) climbed out from a lotus flower – the same thing Harsomtus does in form of a snake in the Dendera pictures. A lotus flower is no lamp socket – it doesn’t look like one, and the inscriptions explaining the pictures simply state its a lotus flower. The lotus flower was used e.g. for the production of ointments. The God Nefertem, the Memphitic version of the sun god, was even called “The Large Lotus Flower”, who emerges as the first thing from the receding waters and started creation – that is much too far to expect from a lamp socket 🙂 . Lotus flowers looking similar to the ones depicted in Dendera were often shown in desk scenes, and they were the coat of arms plant of upper Egypt – the Knights of the Lamp Socket?? If the objects in Dendera would indeed show lamp sockets, some texts and interpretations would really be more than a little funny.

The figure in the center is called Ka, and the connection of the texts on the north wall suggests that it is the Ka of Harsomtus. Ka is a type of physical soul and no “priest handling a device” as some authors propose.

The God on the “box” is Heh, the carrier of the sky, which supports the rising sun, a scene thousand-fold to be found in Egypt. Heh is like Djed a symbol for eternity – it defines however the cyclic eternity, contrary to Djed, which is for the “continuing” eternity. That is not by any means ridiculous, but has something to do with the way the old Egyptians saw “time”. There were objects which lasted forever – the sky, the sun, the earth. But an eternal sun wasn’t the guarantee, that the sun returned from the kingdom of the dead every morning! This was guaranteed by the cyclic eternity, represented by Heh. The pictures in the east represent the sunrise, whereas the pictures in the western spaces D and E show the sunset. And again without lamp.

With this knowledge, the three forms of the “lamp” objects suddenly make sense: In the first picture Djed carries the Harsomtus to make it eternal, and Heh the morning sky to let it come again in all eternity. In the second picture supports Djed the sky to make it eternal, and in the third one Heh to let it come again for all eternity. Both Reiliefs face each other directly. The technically absolutely unreasonable arm position of these pictures gives now a unique sense.

The Djed, the Duat, the Barge, Harsomtus, the Ka, the snake, Heh, etc. are foundations for whole theologies during all of ancient Egypt. All of these are well understood and give no room for misunderstood technique. For example, the Djed became since oldest time in combination with anch (life) and Uas (welfare) a luck symbol. No place for insulators. Almost as old is conception of the Djed as carrier of the sky, a canopy could rest therefore on four Djed pillars – why should a ceiling rest on insulators??? The Djed occurs very often in pairs. The Djeds is called then Schu (sky carrier) and Tefnut (in this case likewise sky carrier). The list could be continued easily much further, but these examples should be enough to see that there is no place in the Djed to be an insulator.


THE TRANSLATION OF THE TEXTS
Undeniably to interpret as lamps…

Further down you can read the translations of the texts of the crypts made by Egyptologist Wolfgang Waitkus. Based on these texts authors Krassa/Habeck come to the conclusion:

“Surprisingly the texts of Dendera contain actually essentially technical data and paragraphs, which can be linked problem-free with our “electrical hypothesis”. Not only this: They represent an ideal, meaningful supplement and support our interpretation in an amazing way.”

Author Habeck goes even further in claiming that Egyptologists are completely useless for deciphering the reliefs, since because of a lack of technical training they could not recognise a light bulb when standing right before one!! Literally:

“An egyptologist may be a specialist in his area, but is he able do detect electrotechnical knowledge in old texts and pictures? Hardly. He would probably never comt to the thought, because school book science anyhow categorically excludes this possibility.”

But judge for yourself:

Complete text of the south wall:

Bandeau de la frise:

Resomtus is alive with gloss in the sky (and) lives at the day of the New Year celebration. He lights up in its house in the night of the child in his nest, by donating the light to the country from the birth bricks. The sky is jubilant, the earth is pleased and the God chapels is glad, when he appears in his chamber in his procession barge at his beautiful celebration of the New Year.
The God with his disk has come to see him. Nehebkau gives him reputation, and the goddess with her disk, with godly body, rejuvenates him in his sanctuary.
Tchnt tpjt jnr (probably the goddess Thoeeris, a birth goddess) is content because of her majesty. She praises Re because of him with praise for his Ka, with wine from schfjt (wine area) and meat bits on the altar before him.
The “land-of-Atum” (= Dendera) is prepared with his most distinguished plan, as Hu and Sia are subordinated to him. He may protect the son of Re (empty king cartouche), forever.

Title of the south wall:

Bringing of the amuletts (Pektoral) made of gold.
Speak: To speak words: This is the protection of your majesty for the celebration, in ktmt gold.

Ihi: Words to speak of Ihi, the great, the son of the Hathor, the noble child with shining plait: I please your heart with glories for your person, and I drive rage out with spells.

King: The king of upper and lower Egypt (cartouche with the name of Ptolemaeus XII.), the son of Re (cartouche with another name of the same king).

Royal edge line

I came to you, to your place (destroyed section). Beautiful one, whose looks are perfect. I have the Amulet of gold (destroyed section) attached with live on the day of the celebration (destroyed section) of your body.

Isis: Words to speak of Isis, the great, the gods mother, lady of jat dj, who stays in Dendera, the beginning with whose arrival the earth began, turquoise skin and lapislazuli like head.

Harsomtus: Words to speak of Harsomtus, the great god who stays in Dendera. Gold, height: 4 hands. Made of metal the Day barge, the lotos flower from gold (this section is about the statues kept here, which were brought upward (room G)).

Harsomtus: Words to speak of Harsomtus, the great God, who stays in Dendera, the multicolored-feathered who is on the Serech. Gold. Height: 1 cubit. (the falcon on the relief is meant)

Ihi: Words to speak of Ihi, the great, the son of the Hathor, Re in its shape of the great God, who appears with the diadem as a king of jztj (Egypt)and as a master of the Sed festival,: You reign Dendera millionfold from the nhh eternity to the completion of the Djed eternity. Gold. Height: 1 cubit.

Harsomtus: Words to speak of Harsomtus, the great, who stays in Dendera, the living Ba in the Lotus flower of the day barge, whose perfection the two arms of the Djed pillar carry as its seschemw picture, while the Ka’s on its knees are with bent arms. Gold. All precious stones, height: 3 hands.

Harsomtus: Words to speak of Harsomtus, the great, who stays in Dendera, who is in the arms of the princes in the night barge, the noble snake, whose chntj statue carries Heh, whose crew carries his perfection in holyness, because of whose Ba the appearing (Hathor) in the sky appeared, whose shape is admired by admirers, who comes as unique, enveloped by his head serpents, with numerous names at the point of chw.n=sn (Gods with relationship with the Hathor), the sechm-picture of Re in the “Land-Of-Atum” (= Dendera), the father of the Gods, who created everything. Gold, metal, height: 4 hands.

Isis: Words to speak of Isis, the great, mother of the Gods, lady of jat dj, who stays in Dendera, the queen of the rchjt people, with pointed horns.

Edge line of the Gods

Come in peace, servant of his Lord, as the chw djeser priests are subordinated to you, and you protect my throat with your trusty behavior. I have myself pleased about the freshness of your character. Gold. Height: 1 cubit.

Final remarks:

As the text proves, there is no question about the contents of the reliefs. The texts describe the pictures as representations of statues, which were kept in these rooms. They give detailed descriptions of their extents and even the used material. A bulb made from gold – well, much light would not shine through it 🙂

Even if one does not understand the contents of the texts, which admittedly sound rather confusing without previous knowledge, one should perhaps believe this time the Egyptologists or at least accept the mention of the New Year celebrations as main theme.

Clearly visible is the fact that there is not the smallest suggestion which could justify an interpretation as light bulb in the texts. The function of these rooms was to keep the cult statues which were necessary for the celebrations mentioned. Further references to these absolutely clear circumstances supply the other walls of the rooms, whose texts are not shown here. As found so often, the whole theory is based on the complete neglect of all results of scientific archaeological work. The light bulb thesis is pure fantasy without empirical core, based solely on the “looks like – was then”-method and takes no consideration of any facts – even not to those written in large “letters” right beside it.


Light of the pharaohs…

In German speaking countries the idea of “electric lighting” was brought to a greater public by two Austrian authors, Reinhard Habeck and Peter Krasa. I could not find any reference to them on any English website, so i believe that they play no role outside Austria/Gemany/Swiss. They even seem to have occupied the idea from a Scandinavian author whose book I unfortunately could not get yet.
Because of the irrelevance of Krassa/Habeck in the rest of the world I will not bring my critique of their book here. But in the book they use some tricks do make the Hathor temple mysterious, that I have found on several English wep pages about Dendera, too. Therefore you can find these few examples here.

Age and inscription

To make the Hathor temple mysterious enough it must be old. Very old, prehistoric if possible. Because we could hardly speak of an influence for pharaonic Egypt, if the first and only temple containing such pictures was from, lets say, about 50 B.C. Therefore the “lamp authors” declare the temple to be old. Their first piece of evidence: The “Zodiac of Dendera”, located on top of the temple, is prehistoric! The zodiac is a kind of a small orrery, hewn into a rock, with a diameter of about 3 meters. When the orrery is prehistoric, the temple beneath must be much more prehistoric 🙂 simple. The ozodiac shows the constellations of the stars and the planets and is prehistoric, because “the represented constellations do not correspond with those of our time”. But: Analyses of the zodiac made for example by the mathematical-astronomical section at the Goetheanum showed, that the zodiac does not represent an astronomically possible constellation, since for example Venus and Mercury are to each other in an astronomically impossible angle. It is therefore no real representation, but a symbolic overview of all planets and constellations which could be seen during the years!

By the way: The zodiac cannot be prehistoric – it can be at its oldest from 332 B.C. Why? Because it shows the constellations in their Greek forms!Therefore it cannot be older than the year the Hellens conquered Egypt – 332 B.C.!

But the zodiac is not the only thing to be re-dated for the “higher purpose”. To be old, the writings must be old, too, therefore we can read in Krassa/Habecks book:

“It remained reserved for the French archaeologist Augusts Mariette to find in the middle of the 19th century in the crypts of Dendera […] in yet completely unknown relief figures. Additionally they contained a hieroglyphic writing, which had only little in common with the well-known hieroglyphs on the Rosetta stone. Hieroglyphics from an older epoch of old Egypt, which could not be dated exactly yet, whose decoding has now begun.”

Anybody with even rudimentary knowledge of Hieroglyphics will now protest. Fact is: The old Egyptian writing consisted mostly of syllables. A hieroglyphic usually represents one consonant, which forms a syllable with a not represented vowel. The old writing got along therefore with relatively few characters. Beyond that there was a number of symbols, which contained several syllables (consonants), as well as a collection of “real” picture symbols and determinatives which should suggest, how a word is to be interpreted. All in all approximately 750 characters. At the beginning of Egypt history. All these characters are well-known and their interpretation undisputed.

Much later, more than thousand years after the end of the pyramid era, Egypt became the playball of its neighbors, who attacked, annexed and ruled the country now and then. And all were fascinated by hieroglyphics and began to add own characters. At the time when Egypt was a Roman province, about the 8000 hieroglyphic symbols were used, some of them were found only in one or two reliefs or writings – to guess their meaning is very hard and often cause of great debate. The fact that the Dendera inscriptions are to be translated with difficulty, is therefore a sign for a relatively young age of the Dendera crypts!

Oh, by the way, I forgot. The age of the crypts can be determined even accurately. Krassa/Habeck were, as we can read in their book, about 4 hours inside the rooms and photographed any square cenimeter of the reliefs and inscriptions. So they must have stumbled over the “visiting card” of the owner, its name cartouche. In their book one can be seen on table 24: Ptolemeius XII. And he lived – around 50 B.C.! That was it with prehistoric. If one looks up what Thomas Schneider has written in his “Lexikon der Pharaonen” (Dictionary of the Pharaos) about Ptolemeius XII, we find:

“The outstanding event of the building and religion policy P.s ‘ XII. is the inauguration of the Edfu temple on 7 February 70.
In Dendera he begun in the year 54 B.C. with the construction work of the Hathor temple……

Still any questions?

* * *

All pictures and texts ©1998-2006 Frank Dörnenburg
Reprinted with permission of the author

Source of the original content: Electric lights


LINKS

  • Une promenade en Egypte – website of Alain Guilleux
    Three photos below show reliefs from the inside of the temple of Hathor
    at Dendera


Relief from the inside of the temple of Hathor at Dendera
Photo ©
Alain Guilleux, courtesy of Une promenade en Egypte


Relief from the inside of the temple of Hathor at Dendera
Photo © Alain Guilleux, courtesy of Une promenade en Egypte


Relief from the inside of the temple of Hathor at Dendera
Photo © Alain Guilleux, courtesy of Une promenade en Egypte