WHAT DOES THIS LOOK LIKE TO YOU?
WHAT DID MITRE HAVE IN MIND WITH THIS COVER?
This is the cover of the 1995 MITRE Corporation’s annual report. This organization was spawned by the P.T.B.’s out of MIT University and formed as a corporation in 1958, not for profit mind you. It is a creation of the same people that brought you the CIA, NSA & all the other alphabet soup secret police (ASSP). MITRE is one of the main “skunk works” of the NWO. Their mission is Command, Control, Communications & Intelligence ( C3I) for the NOW world administration through the Unified Combatant Command or COCOM system devised in 1947. COCOM divide’s the planet into six regions, USNORTHCOM (North America), USSOUTHCOM (South America), USEUCOM (Europe & Russia), USAFRICOM (Africa), USCENTCOM ( MiddleEast) & USPACOM ( Far East & Pacific Nations). USNORTHCOM became operational on 9-11-2001. MITRE designs, implements and operates the C3I for ALL branches of the Military, ASSP, FAA and the IRS. They specialize in “Simulations” and CGG (Computer Generated Graphics) integrated into their systems used to run simulated drills to test the systems and personnel. The same people created, and some cases, performed the 8 drills that were running on 9-11-2001 before and during the “terror” attacks. Some of these tests included flying high jacked airliners into the trade centers and the pentagon. Recall the words of our president that day. “ No one every imagined the evil ones would fly airplanes into buildings.”
John Paul – Oct. 2010
The following articles are from the www.septemberclues.info website. Directions to the articles are listed at the bottom of this page. .
… Who did it? Why? How many are involved?
No single study of the 9/11 lie can have the pretense to pinpoint each and every accomplice of such a gigantic scam. Nevertheless, the evidence presented in this research establishes beyond any reasonable doubt the pro-active complicity of the news industry – to an extent previously considered unthinkable. The realization that the news media would play along with that queer gang of megalomaniacs improperly called “the world elite” takes many people by surprise. Some will object: “Wait a minute, wasn’t journalism’s original duty precisely that of checking each and every move of politicians and governing bodies?” In principle, yes. Yet, today, anyone still believing this old fairy tale must be – with no offense intended – daydreaming persons of the very naïve kind. Whatever idealism may have existed in journalism’s heydays has slumped into blind subservience to the rogue warmongers of this world.
This is how one could summarize the current, sorry state of affairs : Today, the self-titled “world elite”, their favored military top brass and a gang of media moguls form a rogue triad which, to use their own terminology, may truly deserve the tag of ‘axis of evil’. Of course, large corporations of all kinds cling to this obligatory power-bandwagon of business opportunities. The news media represents its trusty propaganda arm, tasked with keeping the public ‘happy’, misinformed and apathetic. Their unchallenged power of mass control is routinely used to accomodate the triad’s common, compulsive disorder : a pathological lust for greed and power. This gang of coalesced misfits live in a world of their own and have been playing havoc with the civilized society for too long. It is for the men & women of soundness, integrity and excellence to stop this madness.
The implications of all this are, of course, rather disturbing: many people will either refuse to assess them point blank, shrug them away in resignation and retreat into a “What-could-I-ever-do-about-it?”-mode. This is most unfortunate since it is akin to saying : “I am an impotent dupe and I have no solution for it”. I doubt any self-respecting individual would feel comfortable with such a stance. Possible solutions? A first, smart & simple action would be to disarm that Weapon of Mass Distraction sitting in everyone’s living room: switch it off for good – or at the very least tune it to the rare, unharmful channels only. Your life – and that of your children – will fare all the better for it.
Why 9/11? Remarkably, there are still people wondering what motivations could possibly be behind the largest embezzlement scheme in world history. So, here are a few points to get the ‘why’ question out of the way: Do we all remember that 9/11 started two still ongoing wars in Iraq and Afghanistan? Who profits from them? The invaders or the invaded? Who profits from the reconstruction contracts? Who cashed-in on the special WTC buildings’ terrorist-insurance? Who capitalized on the massive viewer-ratings of the spectacular and longlasting TV coverage of the event? Who speculated and scored on mysterious put options placed prior to 9/11? Who remembers the post 9/11 billion-dollar federal bailouts which saved many airlines from bankruptcy? And how many recall Donald Rumsfeld’s announcement – on Sept.10 2001 – that $2.3 trillion worth of Pentagon transactions were unaccounted for? The list goes on and on. By now, it should be clear to anyone that 9/11 was a big bonanza for everyone involved – just a grand, sick, money-making machine.
Fortunately, a little solace may be found in the latest findings of this research : it is gradually emerging (see the Vicsim Report) that the list of 9/11 victims (approx. 2,928) is a mostly forged database of fictitious identities and forged/morphed photographs. The 9/11 perpetrators are of course close chums with the bankers who hired space in the WTC towers – a ‘genocide’ of their own employees never was an envisaged proposition. Another comforting aspect of this research is that the relentlessly-publicized “War on Terror” is a hoax. All we have to do is clean up our own act – for our own good. No world-threatening ‘foreign terror-cells’ exist – the existing ones have no potential whatsoever to threaten our “Western way of life”. The privileged Western individuals we have allowed to govern our lives are dangerous – but they are very few and highly vulnerable. Their plan to make the “War on Terror” a constant torment of our lives has now failed.
HOW MANY WERE INVOLVED?
How many? Presumably just as many as were needed. Since the TV images would have effectively deceived most unwitting, low-ranking operatives of the scheme, the numbers of those fully ‘in the know’ would not need to be staggering. Having said this, the vast resources available to this multi-billion dollar operation would have attracted – and allowed for – a substantial number of participants (briefed on a strict need-to-know basis). Any risks of leaks and whistleblowing would be securely controlled with cold cash and personal threats. Historically, such methods have been routinely employed by far smaller crime rings: In Sicily, for instance, thousands of people in any given Mafia-infested town know exactly where and who the Mafia-bosses are – yet all mouths are kept nicely shut. This is plain, common knowledge.
It is my intimate conviction that this sorry state of affairs cannot endure indefinitely. Time will come when this perverse spiral of corruption will implode from within, fizzling away just as suddenly and unexpectedly as a pandemic virus. Of course, the steady dedication of individuals of superior integrity will help this day come true. One thing must be kept in mind for that day: the media moguls heading the news corporations share equal responsibility with the higher echelons of power who hired their propaganda machine to deceive humanity.
Relevant Articles on CIA and Media Collaboration
THE CIA and the MEDIA
News giant employed military ‘psychological operations’ personnel
CNN and the 1991 Gulf War
… Historical Development
By Hoi Polloi – January 2010
It is unlikely that we will ever uncover a full and complete list of those who – for whatever personal reasons – contributed time and effort to the sinister magic trick of 9/11. However, without the existence of discrete and persistent social networks which skirt the scrupulous nature of responsible living, its success as a lie would not have been possible. We could go into an endless argument about the personal choices of those involved, and discuss how humans justify to themselves their own behavior, but those arguments – of course – are themselves self-justified and circuitously reasoned. Instead, I would like to share some clues into the nature of these persistent groups, as far as I’ve been able to isolate them, as well as my speculation given what we know about the 9/11 lies.
The historical development of the military event known as 9/11 is a large story. It is potentially an outlandish belief system that never quite addresses the problem of criminal identity. Since I am not in the business of belief systems, I will not be summarizing the world situation to get a brief and simplistic understanding of 9/11. Instead, I have formatted this paper as a working criminal investigation into a few specific time-and-place settings and people; followed by a speculative example of how one might view the world situation, based on this brief dossier. However, I want to stress that it is the personal responsibility of each reader to be highly wary of all such dossiers offered them, even by “journalists,” “informants” and “investigators.” Skeptical, critical thinking should be exercised to its fullest effect when exploring this topic; at this time, the world has become an extremely dodgy place for blind trust to exist outside your immediate circle, let alone in those who are only represented to you by digital and virtual means by a media system long devoid of a moral compass.
Historical Development of 9/11: Situations and People
There is a term in Italian known as “Omertà.” It refers to a fearful phenomenon which few in the English-speaking world might understand, especially if they were to tap into the hackneyed stories of polite, adorable Mafia idiots which plague popular media. The true Mafia in Sicily is not a joke, but a cruel gang of thugs better represented by the villains of Akira Kurosawa’s Seven Samurai or its Hollywood interpretation Magnificent Seven. In Sicily, there are many unspoken rules which have been slowly enforced by the gang’s traveling bullies, such as “taxes” of supplies, food and money demanded each time a Mafia officer enters your establishment. L’Omertà is the household term expressed to answer questions that challenge the unpleasant situation. It is not hard to imagine the violent result of persisting with a question after l’Omertà has already been given as the answer.
Today, it may be appropriate to be aware of this kind of operation when the household term “conspiracy theory” is brandished as the answer to a question. In America or the UK, someone who pursues a better response than “conspiracy theory” is also “disappeared,” though not in the manner of hot lead as might be the case in Palermo. Instead, they are given a far more disturbing social death, an “invisible” status enforced by the same fear which paralyzes the sad people of mob-infested cities. It is even a death which can be temporary, people fading in and out of existence as their conversation goes closer or further away from the dreaded idea: we all support an intolerably ugly situation out of nothing more than a collective, slight nervousness. Let us dispense with such nervousness when honestly examining the following situations.
Sacred Cow C-54, precursor to Air Force One, the sky
It is July 26, and it has been about two years since United States President Harry S. Truman attended the funeral of his major promoter Thomas Joseph Pendergast, less than a week after Truman swore the oath. The only President to have fired large artillery weapons for America’s contribution to the first Great intra-European War was now being forced to handle a great deal of restless generals and admirals threatening mutiny against the existing military, because the Cold War was making them all terribly anxious to see real combat again. To satisfy them, and himself, his pen is running across the bottom of a document that will firmly establish the Air Force and the CIA. And to satisfy Americans, we are being told it is in the best interests of our security as a country and a people. Within the body of the former-Roosevelt transport, powered by Pratt and Whitney technology that would later take Americans into outer space for the first time, the U.S. Air Force was birthed.
A likely presence, then leading the charge of what came to be known as “The Revolt of the Admirals,” was an Arleigh Albert Burke, whose anxiety to reach physical combat with Japanese Destroyer vessels had had him driving his own boats at or beyond full speed toward the enemy (until a boiler burst, killing a crew member). In 1964, Burke would found the CSIS (Center for Strategic and International Studies) entrusted to such dark-minded “luminaries” as Henry Kissinger, Zbigniew Brzezinski and Madeleine Albright.
To understand why the post-war period was spent reforming and re-reforming military branches into a single unified authority, we must understand the nature of the frightening and ridiculous zeal with which men like Burke enter combat, foaming at the mouth. Note that the Air Force came into being asking if we must settle wars with faster, stronger nuclear bomb delivery methods or faster, stronger troop delivery methods – not asking whether it should have a need to exist at all. In short, the culture of paranoia, murder and cultural takeover didn’t reform with the acquisition of technical knowledge nor the “winning” of a war; on the contrary, it formed a sort of nervous fix for adding and coordinating new branches to create more “wins” as quickly and efficiently as possible – the results of which can be described in detail by today’s tumor-ridden children living among nuclear fallout and irradiated bullets.
Admiral Burke was the first Chief of Naval Operations under the 1947-formed organizational structure now comprised of distinct Army, Navy, Air Force and CIA players in the “theater” of war. The role of CNO is a sort of bureaucratic level of combat, managed from small windows and large computer screens. The conspicuous absence of so many branches and sub-branches from the common lists of military bodies might be explained by their individual interests in a particular ambition of Truman’s Presidency known as COCOM – or the Unified Combatant Command. Bases with this pseudo-authority are imbued by military standards with the responsibility in mass coordination of an increasing number of diverse methods of anti-human behavior cults. With each new war, the number increases, gaining new faces, names, symbols and leaders scrambling for ways to play king of the hill. Truman enacted the first of many Unified Command Plans as early as December 14th, 1946. One can use their imagination to guess what kind of seeping “forces” would now grow out of the holy military’s Sacred Cow.
MIT, Boston, Massachusetts
1944 – 1958
Rather than mourning our loss of self-control with the hysteria of dropping horrific and evil nuclear weapons on a human population, the military world apparently perceived Japan’s fire-bombed and devastated population as worthy of “punishment” for the madness of their military generals. Hiroshima and Nagasaki suffered for the madness of ours.
Afterwards, the perceived industrial “genius” of the second great intra-European war (commonly celebrated in patriotic circles as World War II) laid the groundwork for incredible new areas of research into the academic world’s growing addiction to outrageous death profiteering. Using celebration of our scientific application, and the post-war propaganda declaring our scientific strength, the Boston area drew a flood of eager scientists from across the country to contribute even further development to a science already taken too far.
Above:Future Mitre spook
Jack P. Ruina’s
Nuclear Age Reader
Below: MIT students, 1956
In 1944, then MIT professor Jay Wright Forrester, with perhaps a high of academic praise for “founding” the concepts of System Dynamics, began applying his research to a flight simulator to change the way wars could be waged. It is likely that our mad generals were nonplussed by the eerie silence of the terrorist bombers they hired to release the world’s first weapons of mass destruction detonated on a living civilian population. Should such gloomy Guses returning home with grave stories of horror be replaced by the erotic, happy hum of an indifferent machine, perhaps everyone could be as excited as they were to see the liquefied, boiling remains of a million innocent lives. Or rather, not have to see them at all.
What began as a method of controlling and flying war machines, turned into the first (publicly known) digital computer: Project Whirlwind. A number of generals swarmed out of the Pentagon (and out of retirement) to confirm various speculated theories on man-human symbiosis, war automation and the control of the system dynamics of humanity itself. Quietly, excitedly, and well-funded, Forrester spent twelve years on Project Whirlwind, developing and growing his experiment into a powerful basis for the Pentagon’s research into unknown theaters of war.
In 1958, two years after Forrester abandoned the project to its unnamed handlers at MIT, a non-government collective of retired war generals formed a corporation around it called Mitre, disguised for the time-being as a “branch” of MIT; the Whirlwind computer was rechristened as a component of their newly proposed air-based weapon SAGE (Semi-Automatic Ground Environment); and the concept was formally redefined as the premiere enterprise to further the “automation of war.” At its founding, Mitre trustees had access to every significant electronic invention in the previous (and next) fifty years, forming around and within two hugely significant macro-groups: the IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, involving predominantly white engineering fraternities such as Sigma Xi and Theta Xi) and the Pentagon-area “research triangle” stretching from Virginia to North Carolina. The computer was born. And it was a weapon.
February 23, 1947
A group that might be finalized as the International Standards Organization (or perhaps some other acronym in Esperanto or whichever global language it dreams of falling into); the ISO is ostensibly a Latin doublespeak word for equality, which has to date shown neither concern nor success in implementing standards in the interest of equality. ISO is part of a network of globally ambitious players who share the same “netted globe” including the leader in deceptive economic management The World Bank, a series of tyrannous Dutch panels with acronyms across the icon’s equator, and a host of secret societies with uni-letter acronyms and less than charitable achievements under their belts. The ISO has the curious magical power of coordinating governments into accepting arbitrary, undemocratic decisions as law, either through treaties or national standards organizations, and therefore making it ironically without peer in the world. (Who standardizes the standards organizations so that we all can have one?)
While Truman mobilizes players and signs papers in a United States-based (for now) global military standard you may remember is called COCOM, the conscientious objector country begins standardizing everything else under ISO. It is only a matter of time before the – certainly planned – temptation to merge all acronyms is too strong to resist.
ARPA development program: Mitre, Boston, MA and Pentagon, Arlington, VA
CFR member Jack P. Ruina, humble professor of electrical engineering at MIT, is beginning involvement with a series of social psychologists working for the military under the exploding non-governmental branch known as Advanced Research Projects Agency. Just five years prior, MIT’s Lincoln laboratory had been transformed into the Mitre Corporation. The whole area of neuroscience, behavioral science and the control of human thought had excited developers like Ruina, working on computers capable of talking to one another and exchanging “thoughts” and information. One of the scientists eager to offer their research skills for the opportunity to observe previously unheard of numbers of people – and further develop system dynamics into a study coldly named “human terrain” – was the Pentagon (anti-)social psychologist behind “Psychoacoustics” and MIT VIP Joseph Carl Robnett Licklider.
Top: Jack P. Ruina
Above: Joe Licklider
It’s curiously difficult to distinguish them
“Lick” had been interested in information technology, and had moved to MIT in 1950 as an associate professor, where he served on the committee that first established Mitre’s precursor MIT Lincoln Laboratory, as a “psychology program for engineers.” If psychological engineering gives you the shivers, and not the kind these folks get when there’s the smell of warm silicon in the room, you should know that the Rockefeller-funded Tavistock Institute had been working in this department since and throughout the first Intra-European War. Psychology of this nature began out of a “practical” need British war generals had to dissuade people from identifying with the physiological and mental trauma of war, and help people move on to a healthy, functional drive to kill the war generals’ enemies. Out of this rapidly developing tradition, the UK and the USA would form lasting partnerships in mind control and propaganda that apparently – if the 9/11 and 7/7 events are any indication – bouncily continue to this day. And out of that tradition, Licklider conceptualized the Internet with Bolt Beranek and Newman, Incorporated. (We must say “allegedly” due to the hoaxes that fill the road to truth about our government.)
According to a 1989 interview with Mitre trustee Doctor Ruina, he does not “recall” a great many details about how the military program actually started, how it was funded, or what purposes the military had for developing the Internet; except as, perhaps, a ballistic missile defense program. His emphasis and re-emphasis on the uselessness of behavioral science and computer combinations fail to even suggest that DARPA might become a sort of constant, general source of inspiration for all the ways in which imaginative human contributions to the Internet could be absorbed into the war hierarchy. Why would a Mitre spook be so wordily “defensive” about the subject of the very beginning of computer technology or its connections to Rockefeller-funded social study groups? Is it because the Internet was specifically created for the purpose of studying the potential for monitoring and controlling human behavior?
Club of Rome, Bern, Switzerland
Jay Forrester, system dynamics professor, Mitre co-father and world’s first computer animator (bouncing white ball on a black screen) has attracted the attention of the Club of Rome, a policy group dedicated to addressing the problem of world hunger and human self-destruction – not by responsible management of resources, the end of a colonial legacy of exploitation, or the pursuit of ancient, criminally greedy families Rothschild, Rockefeller and royal houses – but by the only apparent alternative – mass murder of millions of “useless eaters.” The Club of Rome expresses to Forrester that they’d love to avoid the latter solution (and we can guess where we might be asked by the rich and selfish members to shove any of the former) so Jay responds that he has a solution and begins work on a total, global system dynamic WORLD1 for Club of Rome to better understand their options outside of giving up a repulsively excessive lifestyle.
September 11, 1973
Social psychologist and systems expert Anthony Stafford Beer had almost finished assisting unknown intelligence groups in a force experiment called CyberSyn, wherein the socialist republic might be “peacefully managed” from the safety of a single control base. Founded on World Dynamics concepts from Forrester’s final model WORLD2, the Santiago-based control room was allegedly “interrupted” by Chile’s dramatic coup d’état and supposedly decommissioned immediately after by the Pinochet regime. CIA involvement in the entire affair remains an exclamation point rather than a question mark. After Beer’s involvement in these events, he allegedly renounced all material wealth and tinted into quasi-obscurity near Toronto, from where he continued to speak on occasional “systems” revelations until his death in 2002.
United States Southern Command is experimentally birthed from these violent and far-reaching trials of the CFR’s authority. After creating another “experimental base” In the 1980s, allegedly internal conflicts in El Salvador, Nicaragua, and elsewhere in Latin America began to draw pronounced interest of systems people in the military; models for the implementation of similar control stations in the United States obviously being on the top of their wish lists. General Electric-slave/puppet Ronald Reagan created the impetus for a permanent, post-“Cold War” U.S. Southern Command involved in “counter-drug operations” and an increased scope of potential military actions, up until September 1997 when the formal COCOM base SOUTHCOM was introduced in Miami on the tumultuous “history” of this relationship. Studies of the true “system dynamics” between South and North American continents during this time would probably reveal much about the events of September 11, 2001.
Undisclosed location of U.S. SouthCom
General Paul F. Gorman, Commander in Chief of a yet ambiguously located Southern Command mentally authors a powerfully insightful philosophy, which explains that the “secret” to peace is to prepare for war at all times and strike first. In a February 1992 document commissioned by the Institute for Defense Analyses under “DARPA Assignment A-132”, General Gorman praises the value of what might be called an early “Shock and Awe” strategy, romantically painting the gore like a pulp novel:
“In recent years, General DePuy has talked often about the ‘style’ of an army, pointing out that those armies acknowledged by historians to have been exceptionally efficient had a distinctive modus operandi–the methodical operational and tactical thrusting of Roman infantry, the mounted sweeps of the Parthians or the Mongols, the combined arms operations of the Byzantines under Belisarius, the amphibious raids of the Vikings. He believes that there is emerging such a style in armed forces of the United States, a way of waging war that combines the arms of our land, sea, and air services, draws adroitly on advanced technology, concentrates force from unprecedented distances with overwhelming suddenness and violence, and blinds and bewilders the foe.”
The future site of U.S. SouthCom, Miami, Florida
It has been seven months since the first “al-Qaeda” event in New York City, in which 5 sim-people are sim-killed during the controlled study of explosive terror events in an urban environment. The site was the North Tower of the World Trade Center. President Bill Jefferson Clinton – and America – has moved on. Canadians have lost a hard political battle against the Free-Trade expansionists that allowed the 1989 Bush-backed plan for a North American Union to come into play almost precisely coordinated with the European Union’s 1992 Maastricht Treaty. Our President gives the following messages in his signing of the NAFTA agreement:
“… I want to say to my fellow Americans, when you live in a time of change the only way to recover your security and to broaden your horizons is to adapt to the change, to embrace, to move forward. Nothing we do — nothing we do in this great capital can change the fact that factories or information can flash across the world; that people can move money around in the blink of an eye. Nothing can change the fact that technology can be adopted once created by people all across the world, and then rapidly adapted in new and different ways by people who have a little different take on the way the technology works.
“For two decades, the winds of global competition have made these things clear to any American with eyes to see. The only way we can recover the fortunes of the middle class in this country so that people who work harder and smarter can at least prosper more, the only way we can pass on the American Dream of the last 40 years to our children and their children for the next 40 is to adapt to the changes which are occurring.
“In a fundamental sense, this debate about NAFTA is a debate about whether we will embrace these changes and create the jobs of tomorrow, or try to resist these changes, hoping we can preserve the economic structures of yesterday.
“I tell you, my fellow Americans, that if we learn anything from the collapse of the Berlin Wall and the fall of the governments in Eastern Europe, even a totally controlled society cannot resist the winds of change that economics and technology and information flow have imposed in this world of ours. That is not an option. Our only realistic option is to embrace these changes and create the jobs of tomorrow.”
Applause follows. SouthCom simmers. It is the first national base with the relatively new designation of COCOM authority. And it is about to go through the interesting transformation of becoming a spearhead against the rest of the entrenched military establishment, so far uncoordinated by Mitre, unjurisdicted by the unified COCOM and unstandardized by the non-government body ISO. And, we can guess, eager to ask for all three.
New York City, NY
February 15, 1929
James Schlesinger is born to Rae and Julius Schlesinger, Jews in a predominantly democratic, liberal, Jewish immigrant community. Schlesinger would dismiss liberalism, grow interested in economics (also known as “making money”) and as a young man study how to do it at Horace Mann and Harvard, before entering the money-military-Mitre portal Rand Corporation. Rand Corporation is presently overseen by Donald Rumsfeld, Henry Kissinger and others, on whom Schlesinger must have made an impression. When Richard Helms refused to block public exposure of Watergate, Schlesinger eagerly offered to cover the globalists’ asses, and he became the director of the CIA.
The CIA and Rand Corporation are closely linked to a rather infamous group known as The Council on Foreign Relations – where a small but important number of public figures create policy for Rand to “develop” and CIA to “investigate” and other CFR members to “consider” – in other words manufacture, push and advertise. All three groups exchange members with the Mitre Corporation. Disagreeable public response to the occasional honest journalist pointing microphones at this network are met with small shifts and musical chairs before business as usual is restored by a grumble from Kissinger. One such non-incident was the dismissal of Schlesinger from his position as later Secretary of Defense for – laughably – asking for “too much money” for the defense budget. This farce of a disagreement only freed him to continue his so-called “speaking career” in which he traveled and lectured on the very poor, sorry defense budget he was apparently fired for speaking of. It also freed him to become a trustee of Mitre Corporation (of which he is, as far as today (September 6, 2009), the chairman of the board), oversee the 9/11 hoax, and then co-manage a certain post-9/11 Homeland Security Advisory Council.
Strategic Air Command, Offutt Air Force Base, NE
Secretary of Defense Robert Gates, could certainly be considered Schlesinger’s friend, if not mentee, having served under him in the CIA during Schlesinger’s influence. But the space program is heating up and our technology is getting us closer and closer to “the moon,” so Gates has skipped out of the CIA to do a stint at Strategic Air Command. He is probably wondering how many people will buy the flimsy tin-foil lander that is supposed to pass for an intrepid spaceship. While the world focuses on bouncing astronauts, Strategic Air Command is vying for its place in the killing game. SAC is the operational establishment in charge of land-based strategic bomber aircraft and land-based nuclear ICBM missiles from the year of Truman’s 1946 unified command acts. Gates serves at Strategic Air Command for a few years, possibly giving it some long-term CFR scope work for its transformation/merging into COCOM base U.S. Strategic Command, which occurs approximately 32 years later on September 11, 2001 under the watch of a certain Mitre friend Donald M. Kerr.
Electronic Systems Division, Hanscom Air Force Base, MA
May 1977 to January 1981
Vice Commander Robert “Tom” Marsh serves military functions in anticipation of a certain Command status headed his way. Such a promotion will likely include his “Pocket Rocket” badge, giving him clearance to launch intercontinental nuclear offensives. In the glazed, robotic eyes of the military, he has certainly earned it. Both during the nervous fog of Whirlwind’s developments circa 1956, as well as during the Apollo era circa 1969, Marsh steadily advanced Wright-Patterson Air Force Base’s reconnaissance, strike and electronics warfare weaponry. In June 1973 the general received his first assignment to Air Force Systems Command headquarters, as deputy chief of staff for development plans – no small title in the CIA-CFR-Rand-Mitre crowd. Indeed, after this final promotion before retirement, General Marsh may start to have an interest in the Mitre Corporation …
Texas A&M University (Formerly Agricultural and Mechanical College of Texas)
August 1, 2002
Gates was the interim Dean of the George Bush School of Government and Public Service at Texas A&M University from 1999 to 2001. Today, August 1, 2002, he becomes the 22nd President of Texas A&M University, after declining the significant position of secretary at newly created Homeland Security. Gates has seen rare career turbulence for a man with his position in the grand fraternal order of whiteness. After his mysterious 1960’s mission at Strategic Air Command, whatever it was, and a return to the Mitre-Rand-CIA-CFR haven, Gates became deputy director of the CIA. In 1986, he allegedly received an infamous “report” (on an Iranian arms diversion) from Mitre trustee and then Deputy Director for Intelligence Doctor Richard J. Kerr. This point later blew up into an infamous media scandal designated “Iran-Contra”, wherein Gates consistently denied memory of any reference to such a document, was eventually rejected as a potential CIA director and was finally accused of passing intelligence to Iraq during its skirmish with Iran, all-in-all a ridiculous and apparently uneventful news-industry performance.
Whatever the purpose of the media’s gluttony for this alleged scandal in particular, Gates simply went on, like Schlesinger’s post-‘dismissal’ career, to lecture and urge the United States to continue its path of self-destructive arms investment. He became president of Texas A&M University on August 1, less than one year after 9/11, and offered documents of public refusal when requests from the Bush Administration to be Secretary for Homeland Security or Director of National Intelligence came his way. Was a CIA director and Vietnam veteran being picked on and denied opportunity by his refusal to cooperate with Mitre’s story or is Gates merely being posed as a troubled person to disguise his knowledge of recent events?
Suffice to say, Texas A&M is an educational outreach of the “Intelligence” consumer groups and might be seen as a sort of “Mitre University” with young CFR initiates getting exposure to prominent American-Israeli dual citizen Zionists and other brands of jingoism. Texas A&M has two branch campuses: one in Galveston, Texas, and one in the Middle Eastern country of Qatar. This is a university with land-grant, sea-grant and space-grant designations. In other words, a neoconservative military playground for junior. The illusion created around Mitre is that it is a group to reckon with if you are in the business of death and you don’t want to face re-education at the hands of Texas A&M. The so-called “hidden hand”, however, is a little too obvious. And ultimately, damning to all involved in even the mildest cover ups of its criminal activity.
Doctor Richard J. Kerr is apparently being interviewed – by some means – by CFR publication editor Robert McMahon. Before “arriving” at his interview, Kerr might be reflecting on his remarkably accelerated rise to power. It had been an exciting time in the 70’s: while all those damned hippies sucked the herb, he – he – was leading research in high altitude weapons effects, nuclear test detection and analysis, weapons diagnostics, ionospheric physics weapons, and alternative energy weapon programs at Los Alamos National Laboratory. And from 1979 to 1985, Dr. Kerr was director of the whole shebang, where military toys are tested on – presumably; but we can’t always be – safe targets. Kerr waits for McMahon to paraphrase the questions he has requested to be asked. Bob had better not mess them up or he might just become a reporter at Texas A&M University. Hopefully, the façade of timid reporter versus bold, brusque interviewee isn’t seen for the CIA-Mitred sham it is.
Let’s see … things Kerr can say: the CIA does illegal activities. People always criticize them. They work hard, and are never appreciated. The CIA mustn’t be satisfied until the CIA does what’s best for America, even if Americans don’t like it. The CIA knows things. Important things. The CIA needs a hug. Those in the know are “predicting” and “forseeing” likely changes, though let’s not mention Mitre corporation’s constant role in developing them over long periods of time and implementing them through covert means. Let’s talk about something safe, something economists would like to read.
McMahon: Let’s talk about the public relations aspect you mention. Is that the very nature of the job, you’re going to have a problem with PR?
Kerr: Let’s face it, the CIA is involved in illegal activities overseas, that’s what it does. It’s its business to collect intelligence. To do that involves a lot of activities that run contrary to laws in foreign countries. The objective is to protect U.S. national security so I think he will find a lot of issues related to that particular kind of problem that a director of central intelligence faces. It’s not a position where you particularly have a lot of popularity. I mean, you have a lot of people who are going to argue that [the agency] does things that it should not do, that are contrary to the tradition and openness of the United States. So it’s an uphill battle in terms of the public relations issue, but the real question is: Can he be an effective leader of the organization?
McMahon: The period you served [in the CIA] was the heart of the Cold War right up to its end. Do you think the agency gets enough credit for some of the successes during that period?
Kerr: Absolutely not. People look at the end of the breakup of the Soviet Union and the Velvet Revolution in Eastern Europe as, well, “those were easy things to do.” They weren’t. They were very complicated […] they don’t give the policymakers nor intelligence near enough credit for that conflict situation.
McMahon: What do you see as the most important area the CIA needs to focus on coming through this process?
Kerr: I think working out some practical relationship between the director of national intelligence and the director of central intelligence, at least temporarily, because I think sooner or later that will be reorganized and there will be a change in it. I think that’s an important issue. I think the relationship with defense becomes very important. Defense is a big elephant in this process, and it is increasingly looking as an organization that does its own intelligence, that makes its own judgments about intelligence independent of an independent organization like the CIA.
The interview meanders, warbles, warns, and fades away. There is no mention of Kerr’s Deputy Directorship of the CIA from 1989 to 1992. No mention of his membership to London-based BAE Systems, the largest, most profitable weapons manufacturer in the world, unmonitored by, and top supplier to, her majesty’s defense since 9/11.
No mention of the vast business mergers and computer cooperations between Israel, America and the United Kingdom’s defense suppliers. Richard J. Kerr is asked to submit a picture. He submits the same portrait that once stood for his trustee position at Mitre, as if to signal a departure from the MIT gang. (Or is it – for some reason – difficult to photograph him?) Today, in his place on the Mitre board of trusty spooks, is the portrait of another Kerr.
GEOINT Symposium, Henry B Gonzalez Convention Center, San Antonio, TX
October 23, 2007
Donald M. Kerr, presumably but so far vaguely related to Richard J. Kerr, is giving a speech to a large body of people interested in Mitre’s next stage of development: quite literally and graphically, a global computer simulation of everything and everyone on the planet, and the predicted consequences of any given action; a program sometimes referred to in Masonic circles as Moriah, the wind of God; in intelligence circles as MARIAH; and in military circles as GEOINT, the keys to which would be – by design – prearranged to Mitre Trustee Admiral James Busey’s Armed Forces Communications and Electronics Association (AFCEA) for total global information awareness.
Kerr discusses his role in the past ten years of sim-events in vague, double-speak terms, ironic warnings about transnational threats, and throughout it all, we are given subtle insight into: the Mitre fabrication of “al-Qaeda”, the purpose of its creation (to activate the StratCom base in Omaha, Nebraska as COCOM center for global control against fictional “terrorists”) and to use Kerr himself to make a slot for their GEOINT global sim to plug into the National Reconnaissance Office’s satellite networks.
Kerr proudly declares that his “people” were involved in every al-Qaeda attack leading up to 9/11, during his position at the FBI, which ended in August 2001, when he – coincidentally – switched to a CIA position. His “handling” of those events, including the U.S.S. Cole false flag event, involved the dissemination of (surely computer-generated) “aftermath” information to the FBI
One can assume, based on the falseness of the 9/11 hoax and its invented villains, heroes and victims, that these micro-sims were created specifically to test the FBI’s and media’s handling of prototypical “sim evidence” software leading up to the gross public colossus of the 9/11 lie.
Mitre Corporation, from Boston to Bedford, MA
1958 – 1989
The keeper of the computer’s military power, throughout its history, is a single man named Robert E. Everett; fraternal member of Phi Beta Kappa, Sigma Xi and Tau Beta Pi; a fellow of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers IEEE; and a member of the National Academy of Engineering, the Association for Computing Machinery, and the American Association for the Advancement of Science, Everett single-handedly posted the most consistent tenure of oversight of Mitre, from its foundation, to its role in implementing 9/11.
In 1943, Mr. Everett became a member of the staff of MIT Servomechanisms Laboratory. In 1947, and in the wake of Truman’s Sacred Cow act, the Servomechanisms Laboratory absorbed Project Whirlwind.
In 1951, a large part of the Digital Computer Laboratory joined the newly formed MIT Lincoln Laboratory as Division VI. In 1956, Everett became head of Division VI of Lincoln Laboratory, where he was in charge of SAGE, Mitre’s premiere project, which he joined as Mitre’s founding technical director in October 1958. In March 1969, he was named executive vice president of MITRE and from 1969 to 1986, Mr. Everett served as president of The MITRE Corporation. Everett oversaw the creation of Mitre’s pioneering website http://www.mitre.org in 1985. After receiving numerous accolades and awards from his brothers, in October 1989 President George HW Bush awarded Everett a medal of technological achievement for his (thusfar inexplicable) work in real-time computer technologies and applications. Why were the Bushes so pleased with his oversight of the Mitre corporation?
Mitre went on to put their people into every study group, government body, industrial board, fraternity and intelligence organization they could fit into and around. Answering Truman’s call for a unified coordinated military monitor and command of Earth, Mitre’s main role since its creation has been not to lead, but to lead the leaders. Its primary method of doing so has been the creation and stubborn persistence of coordinated, unified standards: standards of military measurement, standards of military language, standards of military might, military funding, military construction and operation. The process is meant to be a set of System Dynamics that can monitor and coordinate any and every area of potential military occupation. Based on every historic sign that the groups involved have a mental handicap in curbing aggression, we might presume they would only be satisfied with “everywhere, in every system, in every concept and intrinsically existent in every waking moment.” This potential – as we should have learned from the general’s ceaselessly disgruntled behavior even when we concede to the carnage they demand – is what our spoiled and overfunded military perceives as their birthright. Group systems and communities that function without regard to the warrior bloodlust seem to be sent communications and/or threats, followed by officers from Mitre (or CIA or apparently which ever branch is closest) to “engage” the peaceful party into their war system. Ah, but that’s just l’Omertà, then?
Associated Press, MSNBC, Washington Post Editorial Board, PBS News Hour, Fox News
Two weeks prior and leading up to September 10, 2009
Donald Rumsfeld, the door-to-door salesman, performed a protracted series of perfunctory “interviews” at several news organizations across the country, presumably checking their readiness to expand Mitre’s synthetic theater of war into all the economic, scientific, academic and – of course – military and media institutions “engaged” in their psychological movement against common sense.
Rumsfeld flashing the “M” on Fox News
As late as the night before September 11, 2001, meetings between news agencies and Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld firmly established Rumsfeld’s declaration of war “against bureaucracy,” an avowal to be transformed – the very next day – into a war “against terrorism.”
Rockwell Collins, Cedar Rapids, Iowa
February 3, 2009
Nine days before the faked Buffalo “plane crash” which would have all the signatures, sim-victims, and media reporting qualities of another Mitre sim-disaster, Rockwell Collins apparently lays off 600 employees and sends them home. Rockwell Collins is the thirty-year leader in computing technology and military contracted simulation-interfaces, which also happens to have NORAD chief Ralph E. “Ed” Eberhart on its board of directors at the time of Operation Northwoods (also known as the terror drill 9/11). About a decade prior, when 9/11 was merely a twinkle in Cheney’s eyewear, Rockwell was investigating a start up technology known as Captimax. Apparently developed out of the need to keep advertisements stable and readable on stock car footage, the camera-stabilizing microchip could be installed in anything that needed to be front and center on live footage, including objects as otherwise difficult to film as blindingly fast missiles developed by strategic partner Raytheon. Bunker buster missiles – as hyped by hucksters Rumsfeld and Bush in the opening months of the 2001 Bush Presidency – are no stranger to Rockwell, which has been in the business of war since the industrial revolution.
What we do doesn’t come cheap. Space capabilities usually cost a great deal.”
Another publicity still with the slight “M” sign
Mitre Corporation, Bedford, MA
1996, Annual Report Board Meeting
1995/6 Mitre Corp. Annual Report Cover
The time has come to discuss Mitre’s next steps in the implementation of their masters’ ambitions for a global military tech-tatorship. The cover of their 1995 Annual Report gleefully portrays an eruption of smoke from what looks like the top of a certain familiar complex in New York City. Given the previous Mitre sim-bombing of the WTC just three years earlier, one can assume that the graphic isn’t a mere “insensitivity” but a boastful glorification of their decades-long preparation of what would soon become the advancement of the COCOM agenda.
The 1996 Board of Trustee Membership looked like this at the time of the meeting (unintroduced in bold):
• Victor A. DeMarines – newly appointed President and CEO of Mitre
• James R. “too much money” Schlesinger – former CIA director
• Doctor Jack P. “psychoacoustics” Ruina – Lick collaborator on the foundation of DARPA and Internet
• General Paul F. Gorman (retired) – U.S. SOUTHCOM commander
• General Robert T. Marsh (retired) – executive director Air Force Aid Society
• Admiral James B. Busey IV (retired) – “Permanent Director” of the AFCEA and GEOINT slot-keeper
• Doctor Richard J. Kerr – former principal deputy director to the CIA
• Doctor David V. Ragone – mission critical venture capitalist and MIT senior lecturer
• Doctor William “we need more carbon dioxide” Happer, Junior
• Doctor George H. Heilmeier – CEO of Bellcore and standardizer of nation’s communication lines
• Doctor Lewis M. Branscomb – director of General Foods, Mobil Oil, RAND, Mitre and LordCorp
and Honorary Trustees:
• Robert E. Everett – Mitre’s adoptive father
• William J. McCune, Junior – high ranking Masonic leader
Equipped with such connections, it should come as no surprise that on 9/11, Mitre pal “Ed” Eberhart engaged U.S. NorthCom into the COCOM fold under the pretense of the Northwoods “war drill”, while Bush somewhat “christened” cybernetics and media control center U.S. StratCom, all while the media fakery “unfolded” over the course of September 11, 2001, baffling and distracting even those in the military who might have had some knowledge about the mini “revolution”. By 2001, the 1996 Mitre reports had long ago established the conquering language of their viral sim-framework: known as the “Synthetic Theater of War” (or STOW), and its ambitions were always much larger than the United States; indeed their declaration of intent to format both the DOD and UK’s MOD intelligence networks C4ISR and C4ISTAR respectively into an “understandable” (read: measurable and controllable) version of their Mitre-grown “Architectural Framework” was met with unheralded and perfectly journalist-ignored success. It is 2009 as I write this, and several globalist-invented TV fakery events are occurring every year.
Houston Casualty Corporation, Unknown Branch
Marvin P. Bush, younger brother to President Bush has just left position as board member of WTC and United Airlines security company Securacom/ Stratesec for a one year, post-2001 shift at Brokerage protectorate Houston Casualty, ending this month. As he departs the Houston, London, Ireland, Bermuda and Spain-based company, he perhaps reflects on the recently successful Bush-Walker-Blair takeover of the opium industry in Afghanistan, and is licking his lips for the rebuilding contracts about to be made available in a soon-to-be devastated Iraq.
Seven years later, on September 10, 2009, after Marv has long abandoned such prominent positions, HCC Insurance Holdings will send some speaker to the Keefe, Bruyette & Woods Insurance Conference in New York City. Keefe was one of the major sim-ployee “losers” on September 11, 2001, along with brokerages Cantor Fitzgerald, AON corporation and Marsh & McLennan, who have all received hundreds of contracts and opportunities since their imaginary, collective tragedy. A careful watch of these names reveals the regular interchange of the hundreds of thousands working in the many banking, stock, brokerage, insurance, reinsurance and speculative market companies once securely closed within the World Trade Center offices. It is not difficult to imagine what may be in store for them should they cooperate with Mitre’s exciting business opportunity-creating sims. Or the kind of deals they will be cut out of should they fail to act in accordance with the simulation. But after all, they are brokers – and in their business, the sustained success of a popular lie isn’t digging a deep hole. It’s the victorious management of an “information asset.” And if you think you’re going to make them let go of a profit-making scheme this big, you’ve got another thing coming.
In fact, here comes another one. Live. On CNN.
Public Interest Declassification Board (PIDB)
Martin C. Faga (who looks remarkably like fellow trustee Everett with a prosthetic forehead, but that’s a whole other level of the Mitre onion) was seemingly the CEO of MITRE Corporation on September 11, 2001.
He is the former Assistant Secretary of the Air Force for Space, former Director of the National Reconnaissance Office, former engineer for the CIA, former R&D officer in the Air Force and – of course – the recipient of a number of military and intelligence awards. This MITRE spook is currently the head of the Public Interest Declassification Board (PIDB), which describes itself as: “an advisory committee established by Congress in order to promote the fullest possible public access to a thorough, accurate, and reliable documentary record of significant U.S. national security decisions and activities.” Laughably, under Faga’s leadership, not only were the FOX archives of the 9/11 morning broadcasts entirely “remixed” from other news stations (presumably to cover up the infamous “Nose Out” problem), but as of October, 2008 the archives of the morning 9/11 broadcasts became unavailable. Oh, and they collaborated with NASA to “discover” that the Apollo moon landing reels were written over – and only exist on backup copies in Australia. “Woopsie.”
CINDE, Costa Rican Investment Promotion Agency
Eight years have passed since CINDE slipped the books and managed to appear in only half the tenant lists of the long-destroyed (then re-contracted) World Trade Center complex. CINDE is ostensibly a group of companies “investing” in economic takeover. The Costa Rican face is a missionary sort – white ladies and salesmen, whose main purpose – whose focus – is planting the seeds of economic dependency in the heart of this battered “third world” country; a country that doesn’t need the sort of COCOM, ISO, Mitre corporation nonsense that such parties may think it needs. Perhaps the Costa Ricans are used to the economic hitmen, the sort of Blackwater broker terrorists who come with checks and promises of “renewal” and “development” and other corporate buzzwords for cultural destruction. Perhaps they see it as better than the flying bullets offered them when they remain stubborn. Then, there is the Stateside face of CINDE, which dispenses with pictures of starving children and proudly offers the names of Coca-Cola, Microsoft and Oracle as parties paying checks to get involved. It seems CINDE is acting like a Trojan horse for Oracle, a “system dynamics” maintenance company installed – among other threatening organizations – within BAE Systems, the Mitre-connected weapons corporation mentioned earlier. What is so critical about Costa Rica achieving technological bases for a company connected to arms dealing? For that matter, what is the whole historical issue we seem to have with South America?
When Oracle achieves another “market” for human systems control, do they reflect on their connection to Admiral Busey’s AFCEA network, or do they just open a bottle of wine? Do the employees of Oracle think about their bosses sitting at AFCEA board meetings, glancing at the drooling military drones around them: Lockheed Martin, Mitre, Rand, Interface Incorporated, ManTech, Raytheon, Raytheon C3I Intelligence and Information, Microsoft, Boeing, IBM, IBM Federal, Northrop Grumman, Verizon, Qwest, AT&T, Motorola, IntelliSolutions … and blink? Do they wonder how they managed to get into this mess, how everything seemed to fit so simply together as their colleagues shrugged through Mitre-suggested mergers, stiff military words about cluster computing or the science of “human terrain”? When they released that report the day after September 11, 2001 about losing sim-ployees in the sim-attack as an excuse to remain morose and silent as they “updated” the Oracle-based networks of our government, military contractors and defense departments, to create a more “secure” country … everyone just moved on. And nobody seemed to reflect when Oracle purchased Sun Microsystems, making them the most powerful computer network in the history of the world – with access to every government, intelligence, private and satellite installation with an Oracle technician on hand.
Perhaps lying is okay. Maybe everyone does it. Nobody here seems to be worried. Why not push into Costa Rica? Why not base the new Iraq government on Oracle9i management systems with some ISO-9011 or something stamp of approval? Why not say Iran doesn’t know what’s going on with its own people, that the election was unfair, that they need Oracle voting machines and Oracle security systems? Why not let the bank robbers and Admirals have their global simulation controlled from a single computer? Why the hell not? There’s money to be made! Give the conspiracy theorists Alex Jones and Coast to Coast. Give them Rockefeller-funded David Ray Griffin to write a new religion. Move a Mitre guy from CFR to CIA, or maybe from FBI to RAND. Kissinger will explain it all. Obama will charm the ladies. Just don’t let them question our mergers. What do we tell them if they do? That’s the easiest of all. Tell them it’s just the honor among thieves.
Tell them it’s l’Omertà
Conclusion: The Fear of Losing our Fix Determines the World’s Collective Level of Immoral Behavior
Our addiction, if we have one – those of us interested in the truth – is to believe that most people are also interested in the truth and that if we can just get people hooked on our high, the world will be a better place. That may even be true, but is that the best approach for our interests? First, we have to stop and think about how many addictive lifestyles, belief systems and products there are in this world and which ones people are likely to choose before they select the “truth” drug.
They will give you people who have contacted the fake victims, and had long, revealing conversations with them. They will give you people who can explain that the video-game effects seen in the fabricated videos are actually real footage; yes, evidence of UFO technology which melts buildings like a Playstation animation, they have this technology and they’re keeping it from you! Sure! Any and all excuses to forgive the criminal media network for lying on a daily basis. How many people are aware that Associated Press and Reuters both are powered by the same criminal families? It doesn’t matter how they feed conspiracy theories, because they are still providing you with some version of a media fixation to substitute for the more useful critical thinking and discussions you could be developing among those close and dear to you. And by critical thinking, naturally, I don’t mean an agreement to follow the same alternative Internet sites, programs, foreign movies or music.
What is the purpose of keeping us all glued to the newspapers, magazines and media stories, or intranets like facebook and MySpace, spinning us in circles? They don’t care if someone wears black jeans or blue, if someone loves South Park or makes fun of it, as long as you aren’t paying attention to them. The point of conformity is to get everyone interested in each other instead of letting our attention wander to the way we have all been shafted for the last hundred years in this country, and for the truly evil war crimes perpetuated in our name. There comes a time to put people away for using their power irresponsibly. And that time is now. The people are the media employees who permitted their name to be attached to the 9/11 hoax, and the figures who aid them, tolerate them or try to protect them from justice. The Mitre and Rand corporations must be indicted for treason and war profiteering. I will happily go to jail with them, if I get to grin at the Kerrs in the next cell over. But something tells me we won’t even find out if the Kerrs are real people unless we can all face the power of three major addictions that they have gotten us hooked on:
Trade: once a practical survival mechanism, the exchange of one thing for another has always run the risk of being a swindle. But the swindling has become so advanced and abstracted from real, useful value, that we don’t realize the trade of a business stock is in fact the same as buying shares of people – one hair from the slavery trade. Indeed, the Masonic east coast bankers like J.P. Morgan, who made so much money from the rum used to swindle African chiefs out of their children, are deeply involved in the 9/11 scam. And as long as people don’t recognize buying, renting or leasing human beings for the humiliating and dishonorable practice that it is, our civilization will continue to be deeply sick.
2. Mining: another evolutionary skill, of resource gathering, has created another, troubling “cart-before-the-horse” scenario in which resources are collected faster than they can be used, transformed into objects that cannot be returned to “resource” status, and dumped in an ecosystem with even less transformative skills than humanity has. What’s more, the toys and candy we receive are often merely the industrial waste products of weapon creation factories. What else can be the result of stealing ever deeper and more forbidden resources than the eventual cluttering of our environment with a great deal of things which serve no further purpose except to outlast all life on Earth (and hurry the process of killing us while they’re at it)?
3. War: the least useful of evolutionary skills, combat is merely a temporary endorsement of territorial fear, anger and hate; which gives addicted partakers the undeniable but illusory sensation of defeating self-destructive behavior by engaging in races to destroy others faster than they can destroy themselves. Furthermore, the “redeeming” help offered afterwards is to push all three addictions, Trade, Mining and War, on a weakened and abused population eager to take aid from anyone – even those who just devastated them.
/11 is not so much the event that occurred on September 11, 2001; it is, more practically speaking, an enormous collaboration between the Trade, Mining and War addicts to present a conceptual package of major world addictions in one convenient “happy meal”. Is it any surprise that the pushers of such a drug would do so with elaborate and fantastic lies about its benefits and why we all supposedly need it? Is it any wonder that the world must seem a scary place full of crawling evil beards with razor blades hidden within, so you can buy the 9/11 brand and make it all go away?
Mitre might be errantly described as a sort of drug pusher of our worst addictions. But the culture of Hollywood – with the movie and record industries working hand in hand – is truly the pusher. The dazzling and hypnotizing entertainment and media industry, whose specialty is selling difficult concepts in the guise of exciting adventures, touching personal stories and unimaginative whistfulness; all with the sort of dreadfully cold amusement of business, so they could never be accused of having a bias. “We’re just giving people what they want.” Indeed. Mitre is more like the meth lab, the literal construction workers of viral “belief system dynamics” for the entertainment industry to sell with pretty faces and pumping soundtracks. The friendly, chuckling old saints building a nation-wide sickness with pocketbooks, plane tickets, handshakes, war drills and winks. There is an ample supply of “appearance” addicts in California who will do everything to show you how much they care about eventually, one day, maybe doing something … I dunno … let’s go to this new bar …
On September 11, 2001, two Mitre-guided COCOM bases materialized out of nowhere. Florida based U.S. Southern Command (USSOUTHCOM) was joined by a mysterious place called U.S. Strategic Command (USSTRATCOM) in Omaha, Nebraska and a pre-outfitted base on the U.S.-Canadian border called U.S. Northern Command (USNORTHCOM). After the alleged ‘classroom incident,’ Bush was apparently taken to USSTRATCOM to monitor the unfolding situation. One can assume such an urgent delivery of the executive branch was to peer through the war games with Ralph Ed “pocket-rocket” Eberhart and assure a successful “sell” of the 9/11 tale as it was being piped through television, radio, press and Internet distributors – perhaps via lucrative arrangements with Eberhart and Powell’s ObjectVideo chips.
As a sort of ultimate addendum to the embarrassingly misfired “industrial revolution” that is still traumatizing our sensitive species, the final purpose of mechanization – which had been left unfulfilled by humanity’s inherent safety measures against self-abuse – is now being pushed to its deadly extremes by a group forever persisting beyond humanity’s means. Allegedly to the ends of exploration and knowledge, we have agreed with their sad dependencies in the hopes of becoming untangled by tolerating their thrashing. We are requested on a daily basis to regard their abuses, exploitations, vast material wealth and paranoid security systems as merely coincident with humanitarian goals. Based on the well-known but just-as-well-denied consideration that power corrupts, we might consider the true motivations of those we’ve granted power in exchange for the occasional second-hand power high.
This is an age-old relationship, one that might be narrated in the following way: “I don’t want personal responsibility to something I need to survive, and others are happy to feign the ability to provide it. I am happy to pretend their offer matches my needs, even as it does me and my community harm – because I just want to belong to such a cool, interesting group that gives me so much.”
Thus, our desire for predictable and safe pleasures keeps us in a few irreconcilable cycles of self-destruction:
1. Life loses its mystery. Inspiration is replaced by jaded and cynical thoughts that cripple the imagination, our prime survival tool (not to mention a great deal of fun!)
2. Because we lack inspiration, we lose the inability to process lows. Depression and sadness hit harder and its effects are felt longer. Those around us cannot help us, because they are just as confused about the constant pressure to feel happy and satisfied.
3. Survival itself loses meaning. We turn to thoughts of past, future and alternative lives not our own, and focus on finding justification and survivalist meaning in our addictions, no matter how self-destructive.
In exchange for this living hell, we give all our life force, energy and spare time (not spent indulging in our addictions) to the support of the system which provides them. In this case, that system is a series of gangs defining and maintaining distinct “nationhoods” – actually an artificial mockery of true nations – each comprised of a culturally engineered and tested set of addictive substances, services and “news events” to ensure that none of us escapes the “World Dynamics” model and the collective high we experience as “life.”
Bibliography and NOTES in no particular order
(take all with appropriate grains of salt)
Texas A&M University
James R. Schlesinger
MK-Ultra and Tavistock
IEEE is a strange group, enormous, formed from the “founding” electricians of this country, and tied intimately to Mitre and to every major advancement of technology in the last 100+ years. They claim 125 due to their pre-merged branches. Apparently assembled as a whole in 1963, Nikola Tesla seems to be one of the only members whose technology has stayed hidden behind this monumental group. Observe the list of people who are members and their apparent accomplishments, and you’ll understand quickly why Mitre is interested in having its members within the IEEE:
• Leon Chua, MIT, Perdue, “hypothesizer” and development of the microchip memristor
• Murray Turoff, developer of instant messaging technology, member of RAND corp
• Steven M. West, developer of nCUBE – a multi-processor data output system, capable of rendering a 10-dimensional hypercube in 1985. In other words, extremely powerful 3-D was nothing – they were making 10-D over twenty-five years before 9/11.
• Knight of the British Empire Tim Berners-Lee “Inventer of the world wide web”
• Amar Bose, founder of Bose Speaker corporation, MIT, Tau Beta Pi
• Percy Spencer, inventor of the microwave oven
• Ivan Sutherland, father of modern computer graphics in 1963, Sun Microsystems and RAND Corp (Sun was recently purchased by Oracle corporation Search: CINDE in this paper)
• Robert Adler, invented wireless remote control, Jewish-Austrian
• Teruaki Aoki, Sr. EVP at Sony during 9/11 (It is a long-standing theory that the 2000 Sony Pictures movie Spider-Man was the “safe dump” point for the 3-D model of New York City used in the 9/11 sim. Sony Pictures Imageworks claims to have been commissioned seven years on the model, which seems inordinately long for something even as profitable as a blockbuster Hollywood movie. Sony’s Playstation 3 inexplicably branded their home video game system with the hideous and unmistakable font used for the title sequence of Spider-Man. The real Peter Parker must be spinning in his web.)
• Edwin E. Catmull, co-founded Pixar, computer programmer for Boeing, President of Disney Animation (2006)
• Allen B. DuMont, apparent developer of the modern TV network
• Roger Easton, inventor of GPS
• Thomas E. Everhart, US Energy Department in the 90’s, Sigma Xi, Phi Beta Kappa, Eta Kappa Nu, boards of Raytheon, HP, Agilent
http://www.nndb.com/org/603/000052447/ (Careful of this site, produced by “Soylent” media)
Twitter as a Weapon
Original Source of the 1995 Mitre Report and trustees
Director of National Intelligence Dennis C. Blair (hey, how did another Bush/Blair dummy get into our “Intelligence” departments?)
ObjectVide’s Mario connection to Mitre
September 15, 1999 report by Schlesinger: “New World Coming”
Donald Rumsfeld’s Buddies
Medialink Worldwide: Buying the News for Commercial and Intelligence Purposes
Video news releases or VNRs (also referred to as fake TV news) are segments designed to be indistinguishable from independently-produced news reports that are distributed and promoted to television newsrooms. TV stations incorporate VNRs into their newscasts, rarely alerting viewers to the source of the footage. While government-funded VNRs have been most controversial, most VNRs are paid for by corporations; non-governmental organizations also put out VNRs.
“LORD is a diversified technology company with a long history of developing breakthrough adhesive, coating and motion management technologies that significantly improve the performance of our customers’ products. We have provided innovative solutions to demanding aerospace, defense, automotive and industrial customer problems for more than 80 years.”
David E. Jeremiah
• was selected February 7, 2006, by President George W. Bush to be a member of the President’s Intelligence Oversight Board
• Jeremiah has served continuously as a member of the Board of Trustees at the MITRE Corporation since 1999.
• He is also a member of the Board of Directors at the Jewish Institute of National Security Affairs.
Protected Instant Photography
CFR and Trilateral Commission Member Lists (view skeptically as “complete”)
Jack P. Ruina (about that lovely time he doesn’t recall exactly while developing the Internet)
Every Director of the CIA since 1966 has been on board of CFR
Eberhart on the New World Order they envision:
“Finally, in NORAD, we struggle with relevance. We struggle with the unfair accusation that we are a Cold War relic and that we have no relevance in this New World Order–Old War Disorder in many of our views. I argue that is exactly the wrong site picture. Air sovereignty is important and will remain important in a nation whose Armed Forces have to be able to guarantee that regardless of threat.
“Back to the cruise missile threat that we foresee in the future, I think it will become even more relevant in the years ahead. And we have adapted to this New World Order. There are 20 airplanes on alert out there today in both of these nations – a total of 20. Compare that to the 50s and 60s when there were more orange flight suits than green flight suits out there. More airplanes at Air Defense Command than at Tactical Air Command.”
The Secret to War is … Striking First! by Gorman
Gorman’s mysterious “Cardinal Point” … so much for pointing to anything cardinal
Is it … http://www.aedesigners.net/about.html ?
Network-centric Warfare: Dominating entire societies Worldwide through ubiquitous surveillance
by Tom Burghardt
Joint Force (subject to COCOM authority)
Clinton’s NAFTA speech
Project Whirlwind sent back home
Fuzzy Victim Numbers
Robin Hood Foundation (LOL sure)
• Jeffrey R. Immelt – chairman of General Electric until September 7, 2001
• Glenn Dubin, Chairman – Co-Founder and Managing Member, Highbridge Capital Management
• Robert Pittman, Vice Chairman – Partner, Pilot Group, LLC
• Dirk Ziff, Vice Chairman – Chairman, Ziff Brothers Investments
• Lee S. Ainslie III – Managing Partner, Maverick Capital Management, LLC
• Victoria B. Bjorklund – Partner, Simpson Thacher and Bartlett
• Lloyd C. Blankfein – President and C.O.O., The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
• Peter F. Borish – C.E.O., Twinfields Capital
• Tom Brokaw – NBC Newsm
• Geoffrey Canada – President and C.E.O., Harlem Children’s Zone
• Maurice Chessa – Director, Bedford Stuyvesant–I Have a Dream Program
• Richard L. Chilton, Jr. – President and C.E.O., Chilton Investment Company, Inc.
• Steven A. Cohen – Chairman and C.E.O., S.A.C. Capital Advisors, LLC
• Marian Wright Edelman – President, Children`s Defense Fund
• Jeffrey R. Immelt – Chairman and C.E.O., General Electric Co.
• Paul Tudor Jones II, Founder, Chairman and C.E.O., Tudor Investment Corporation
• Peter D. Kiernan III – President and Partner, Cyrus Capital Partners
• Marie-Josee Kravis – Senior Fellow, Hudson Institute, Inc.
• Kenneth G. Langone – Chairman and C.E.O., Invemed Associates, Inc.
• Mary McCormick – President, Fund for the City of New York
• Doug Morris – Chairman and C.E.O., Universal Music Group
• Daniel S. Och – Senior Managing Member, Och-Ziff Capital Management Group
• Gwyneth Paltrow – Actress
• David Puth – Managing Director, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
• Diane Sawyer – Co-Host, Good Morning America and Primetime Thursday
• Alan D. Schwartz – President and Co-C.O.O., The Bear Stearns Companies
• John Sykes – President, Network Development, MTV Networks
• Harvey Weinstein – Co-Chairman, The Weinstein Company
System Dynamics (ENORMOUS SUBJECT! LOOK OUT!)
http://www.systemdynamics.org/DL-IntroSysDyn/origin.htm http://sysdyn.clexchange.org/sdep/papers/D-4165-1.pdf http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthony_Stafford_Beer
David V. RrrrrrruGOneee
Theta Xi fraternity
Robert W. “slavery was economically sound” Fogel – Ohio speaker
Richard J. Kerr and Donald M. Kerr (Dicker and Donker? How deep does the simulation go???)
George H. Heilmeier
Oracle (merging with everything that touches it)
William J. Happer – the “anti-Al Gore”
Truman National Security Project Educational Institute (fascinating read on how “intelligence” is treated like a commercial commodity)
Lincoln and the war against the Bankers
photos © their respective parties
This report is the compilation of personal research and the research of others at forum.911movement.org, conducted from November 2007 to September 2009.
It is safe to assume some of this information will receive the application of digital white out or get sent through a digital paper shredder. Serves us right for trusting the Internet was made in our interests. If you care about it, join the movement to create an Internet free of pipeline dependencies: maybe send e-mails and sites by radio? Is it too late to learn psychic powers? 😛
Thank you to all the uncompromised sources for staying strong.
Thank you to all the compromised sources for your generous information systems. It is clearly a cry for mental help. We hear you and we’re working on it.
Thank you Simon Shack for the opportunity to share my perspective.
Thank you to all the anonymous supporters around the world.
THANK YOU HOI POLLOI.
After you enter the site, the articles and other very ineresting information is to the right.
To read the article at the www.septemberclues website . Follow the direction below. Part of the document is below that
Make a Free Website with Yola.